Cargando…
Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Although nerve-sparing radical surgery (NSRS) is an emerging technique for reducing surgery-related dysfunctions, its efficacy is controversial in patients with cervical cancer. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes, and urinary, anorectal, and sexual dysfunction...
Autores principales: | Kim, Hee Seung, Kim, Keewon, Ryoo, Seung-Bum, Seo, Joung Hwa, Kim, Sang Youn, Park, Ji Won, Kim, Min A, Hong, Kyoung Sup, Jeong, Chang Wook, Song, Yong Sang |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Lee, Seung Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial
por: Roh, Ju-Won, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
por: Ditto, Antonino, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the precision surgery for cervical cancer
por: Sakuragi, Noriaki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)