Cargando…

Left Atrial Function Following Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Evaluation Using Dual-Source Cardiac Computed Tomography

PURPOSE: The Maze procedure has shown excellent efficacy in the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, little is known about the quality of functional recovery in the left atrium (LA) following successful sinus rhythm conversion by the Maze procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Joon Bum, Yang, Dong Hyun, Kang, Joon-Won, Jung, Sung-Ho, Choo, Suk Jung, Chung, Cheol Hyun, Song, Jae-Kwan, Lee, Jae Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.608
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The Maze procedure has shown excellent efficacy in the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, little is known about the quality of functional recovery in the left atrium (LA) following successful sinus rhythm conversion by the Maze procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 12 patients (aged 52.5±10.1 years, 1 female) with valvular AF undergoing mitral valve surgery combined with the Maze procedure. Parameters of LA function in three anatomic compartments [anterior, posterior, and LA appendage (LAA)] were evaluated using electrocardiography-gated dual-source cardiac CT at one month and at six months after surgery. Twelve subjects matched by age, gender, and body surface area served as controls. RESULTS: At one month after surgery, ejection fraction (EF) and emptying volume (EV) of the LA were 14.9±7.4% and 21.3±9.7 mL, respectively, and they were significantly lower than those of the control group (EF, 47.9±11.2%; EV, 46.0±10.7%; p<0001). These values did not significantly change throughout late periods (p=0.22 and 0.21, respectively). Functional contributions of the anterior, posterior, and appendage compartments (EV of each compartment/overall EV) were 80.4%, -0.9%, and 20.5%, respectively, for those with LAA preservation (n=6); 100.1%, -0.1%, and 0% for those with LAA resection (n=6; p<0.05); and 62.2%, 28.2%, and 9.7% in the control subjects (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Contractile functions of the LA significantly decreased after the Maze procedure. Functional contributions of three compartments of the LA were also altered. The influence of LAA preservation on postoperative LA functions needs to be evaluated through studies of larger populations.