Cargando…

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration

PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sooyoung, Kim, Youn Jin, Baik, Hee Jung, Kim, Jong Hak, Woo, Jae Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838
_version_ 1782366704404267008
author Cho, Sooyoung
Kim, Youn Jin
Baik, Hee Jung
Kim, Jong Hak
Woo, Jae Hee
author_facet Cho, Sooyoung
Kim, Youn Jin
Baik, Hee Jung
Kim, Jong Hak
Woo, Jae Hee
author_sort Cho, Sooyoung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing surgery of the forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated to three groups. 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL was used. The PN group (n=26) received injections at the median, ulnar, and radial nerve with 8 mL for each nerve. The PV1 group (n=26) received a single injection of 24 mL at 12-o'clock position of the axillary artery. The PV2 group (n=26) received two injections of 12 mL each at 12-o'clock and 6-o'clock position. For all groups, musculocutaneous nerve was blocked separately. RESULTS: The PN group (391.2±171.6 sec) had the longest anesthetic procedure duration than PV1 (192.8±59.0 sec) and PV2 (211.4±58.6 sec). There were no differences in onset time. The average induction time was longer in PN group (673.4±149.6 sec) than PV1 (557.6±194.9 sec) and PV2 (561.5±129.8 sec). There were no differences in the success rate (89.7% vs. 86.2% vs. 89.7%). CONCLUSION: The PV injection technique consisting of a single injection in 12-o'clock position above the axillary artery in addition to a musculocutaneous nerve block is equally effective and less time consuming than the PN technique. Therefore, the PV technique is an alternative method that may be used in busy clinics or for difficult cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4397458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43974582015-05-01 Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration Cho, Sooyoung Kim, Youn Jin Baik, Hee Jung Kim, Jong Hak Woo, Jae Hee Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing surgery of the forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated to three groups. 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL was used. The PN group (n=26) received injections at the median, ulnar, and radial nerve with 8 mL for each nerve. The PV1 group (n=26) received a single injection of 24 mL at 12-o'clock position of the axillary artery. The PV2 group (n=26) received two injections of 12 mL each at 12-o'clock and 6-o'clock position. For all groups, musculocutaneous nerve was blocked separately. RESULTS: The PN group (391.2±171.6 sec) had the longest anesthetic procedure duration than PV1 (192.8±59.0 sec) and PV2 (211.4±58.6 sec). There were no differences in onset time. The average induction time was longer in PN group (673.4±149.6 sec) than PV1 (557.6±194.9 sec) and PV2 (561.5±129.8 sec). There were no differences in the success rate (89.7% vs. 86.2% vs. 89.7%). CONCLUSION: The PV injection technique consisting of a single injection in 12-o'clock position above the axillary artery in addition to a musculocutaneous nerve block is equally effective and less time consuming than the PN technique. Therefore, the PV technique is an alternative method that may be used in busy clinics or for difficult cases. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2015-05-01 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4397458/ /pubmed/25837194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Sooyoung
Kim, Youn Jin
Baik, Hee Jung
Kim, Jong Hak
Woo, Jae Hee
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
title Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
title_full Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
title_fullStr Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
title_short Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
title_sort comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block techniques: perineural injection versus single or double perivascular infiltration
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838
work_keys_str_mv AT chosooyoung comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration
AT kimyounjin comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration
AT baikheejung comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration
AT kimjonghak comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration
AT woojaehee comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration