Cargando…
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838 |
_version_ | 1782366704404267008 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Sooyoung Kim, Youn Jin Baik, Hee Jung Kim, Jong Hak Woo, Jae Hee |
author_facet | Cho, Sooyoung Kim, Youn Jin Baik, Hee Jung Kim, Jong Hak Woo, Jae Hee |
author_sort | Cho, Sooyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing surgery of the forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated to three groups. 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL was used. The PN group (n=26) received injections at the median, ulnar, and radial nerve with 8 mL for each nerve. The PV1 group (n=26) received a single injection of 24 mL at 12-o'clock position of the axillary artery. The PV2 group (n=26) received two injections of 12 mL each at 12-o'clock and 6-o'clock position. For all groups, musculocutaneous nerve was blocked separately. RESULTS: The PN group (391.2±171.6 sec) had the longest anesthetic procedure duration than PV1 (192.8±59.0 sec) and PV2 (211.4±58.6 sec). There were no differences in onset time. The average induction time was longer in PN group (673.4±149.6 sec) than PV1 (557.6±194.9 sec) and PV2 (561.5±129.8 sec). There were no differences in the success rate (89.7% vs. 86.2% vs. 89.7%). CONCLUSION: The PV injection technique consisting of a single injection in 12-o'clock position above the axillary artery in addition to a musculocutaneous nerve block is equally effective and less time consuming than the PN technique. Therefore, the PV technique is an alternative method that may be used in busy clinics or for difficult cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4397458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43974582015-05-01 Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration Cho, Sooyoung Kim, Youn Jin Baik, Hee Jung Kim, Jong Hak Woo, Jae Hee Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing surgery of the forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated to three groups. 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL was used. The PN group (n=26) received injections at the median, ulnar, and radial nerve with 8 mL for each nerve. The PV1 group (n=26) received a single injection of 24 mL at 12-o'clock position of the axillary artery. The PV2 group (n=26) received two injections of 12 mL each at 12-o'clock and 6-o'clock position. For all groups, musculocutaneous nerve was blocked separately. RESULTS: The PN group (391.2±171.6 sec) had the longest anesthetic procedure duration than PV1 (192.8±59.0 sec) and PV2 (211.4±58.6 sec). There were no differences in onset time. The average induction time was longer in PN group (673.4±149.6 sec) than PV1 (557.6±194.9 sec) and PV2 (561.5±129.8 sec). There were no differences in the success rate (89.7% vs. 86.2% vs. 89.7%). CONCLUSION: The PV injection technique consisting of a single injection in 12-o'clock position above the axillary artery in addition to a musculocutaneous nerve block is equally effective and less time consuming than the PN technique. Therefore, the PV technique is an alternative method that may be used in busy clinics or for difficult cases. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2015-05-01 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4397458/ /pubmed/25837194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cho, Sooyoung Kim, Youn Jin Baik, Hee Jung Kim, Jong Hak Woo, Jae Hee Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration |
title | Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration |
title_full | Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration |
title_short | Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration |
title_sort | comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block techniques: perineural injection versus single or double perivascular infiltration |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25837194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chosooyoung comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration AT kimyounjin comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration AT baikheejung comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration AT kimjonghak comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration AT woojaehee comparisonofultrasoundguidedaxillarybrachialplexusblocktechniquesperineuralinjectionversussingleordoubleperivascularinfiltration |