Practical surrogate marker of pulmonary dysanapsis by simple spirometry: an observational case–control study in primary care

BACKGROUND: We see patients who present with spirometry airflow limitation despite their forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) as well as forced vital capacity (FVC) to be supernormal (FEV(1)/FVC < 70%, both the %FEV(1) and the %FVC ≧100%) in asymptomatic healthy non-smokers. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized these spirometry conditions (results measured with spirometry) could be suitably used as a practical surrogate marker of pulmonary dysanapsis: the condition of disproportionate but physiologically normal growth between airways and lung parenchyma. METHODS: We compared the conventional surrogate marker of dysanapsis, maximum mid-expiratory flow to FVC (MMF/FVC), in SUBJECTS (FEV(1)/FVC < 70%, both the %FEV(1) and the %FVC ≧100% in healthy non-smokers) (n = 25), in EMPHYSEMA (CT confirmed pulmonary emphysema, same spirometry results with SUBJECTS) (n = 55), and in CONTROLS (age- and height- matched, normal spirometry results) (n = 25). Next we added imaging analysis to evaluate the relationship between the cross sectional airway luminal area (X-Ai) and the lung volume results among the three groups. RESULTS: The MMF/FVC was significantly lower in SUBJECTS and in EMPHYSEMA compared to CONTROLS. However, percent predicted peak expiratory flow (%PEFR) was significantly lower only in SUBJECTS and not in EMPHYSEMA compared to CONTROLS. The ratio of the X-Ai of the trachea and right apical bronchus to lung volume was significantly lower in SUBJECTS compared to CONTROLS. CONCLUSION: The simple spirometry conditions in SUBJECTS are highly suggestive of practical surrogate marker of pulmonary dysanapsis. Awareness of this concept would help to attenuate the risk of overdiagnosis of obstructive pulmonary disease.