Cargando…

Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia

We studied recent antibiograms (2010 to 2011) from 12 hospitals in the Hampton Roads area, Virginia, that refer patients to a tertiary-care facility affiliated with Eastern Virginia Medical School. The data was compiled into a regional antibiogram, and sensitivity rates of common isolates from the t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Var, Susette K, Hadi, Rouba, Khardori, Nancy M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0080-6
_version_ 1782366746317946880
author Var, Susette K
Hadi, Rouba
Khardori, Nancy M
author_facet Var, Susette K
Hadi, Rouba
Khardori, Nancy M
author_sort Var, Susette K
collection PubMed
description We studied recent antibiograms (2010 to 2011) from 12 hospitals in the Hampton Roads area, Virginia, that refer patients to a tertiary-care facility affiliated with Eastern Virginia Medical School. The data was compiled into a regional antibiogram, and sensitivity rates of common isolates from the tertiary-care facility (central) were compared to those of referring hospitals grouped by locale. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common Gram- positive and E. coli the most common Gram- negative organism grown from clinical samples in the area. Overall 53% of S.aureus isolates were resistant to oxacillin. There was a broad scatter of MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) for vancomycin within the susceptibility range, and MIC of 4 μg/mL was reported in 2012. Penicillin resistance was seen in 50% and erythromycin resistance in 45% of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Vancomycin resistance was seen in 75% of Enterococcus faecium and 2% of Enterococcus faecalis respectively. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most resistant Gram negative organism in the data compiled. Among the Escherichia coli, 26%, 44% and 52%were resistant to Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole ( SXT) ampicillin- sulbactam and ampicillin respectively. We found significant differences in methodology, interpretation and antibiotic panels used by area laboratories. Based on these findings, we are now prospectively following resistance patterns in the tertiary-care facility, sharing data, and creating a consistent approach to antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4397712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43977122015-04-16 Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia Var, Susette K Hadi, Rouba Khardori, Nancy M Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research We studied recent antibiograms (2010 to 2011) from 12 hospitals in the Hampton Roads area, Virginia, that refer patients to a tertiary-care facility affiliated with Eastern Virginia Medical School. The data was compiled into a regional antibiogram, and sensitivity rates of common isolates from the tertiary-care facility (central) were compared to those of referring hospitals grouped by locale. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common Gram- positive and E. coli the most common Gram- negative organism grown from clinical samples in the area. Overall 53% of S.aureus isolates were resistant to oxacillin. There was a broad scatter of MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) for vancomycin within the susceptibility range, and MIC of 4 μg/mL was reported in 2012. Penicillin resistance was seen in 50% and erythromycin resistance in 45% of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Vancomycin resistance was seen in 75% of Enterococcus faecium and 2% of Enterococcus faecalis respectively. Acinetobacter baumannii was the most resistant Gram negative organism in the data compiled. Among the Escherichia coli, 26%, 44% and 52%were resistant to Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole ( SXT) ampicillin- sulbactam and ampicillin respectively. We found significant differences in methodology, interpretation and antibiotic panels used by area laboratories. Based on these findings, we are now prospectively following resistance patterns in the tertiary-care facility, sharing data, and creating a consistent approach to antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the region. BioMed Central 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4397712/ /pubmed/25890362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0080-6 Text en © Var et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Var, Susette K
Hadi, Rouba
Khardori, Nancy M
Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia
title Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia
title_full Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia
title_fullStr Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia
title_short Evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, Virginia
title_sort evaluation of regional antibiograms to monitor antimicrobial resistance in hampton roads, virginia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25890362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-015-0080-6
work_keys_str_mv AT varsusettek evaluationofregionalantibiogramstomonitorantimicrobialresistanceinhamptonroadsvirginia
AT hadirouba evaluationofregionalantibiogramstomonitorantimicrobialresistanceinhamptonroadsvirginia
AT khardorinancym evaluationofregionalantibiogramstomonitorantimicrobialresistanceinhamptonroadsvirginia