Cargando…
Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
BACKGROUND: The performance of recommended control measures is necessary for quick and uniform infectious disease outbreak control. To assess whether these procedures are performed, a valid set of quality indicators (QIs) is required. The goal of this study was to select a set of key recommendations...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x |
_version_ | 1782366746998472704 |
---|---|
author | Belfroid, Evelien LA Hautvast, Jeannine Hilbink, Mirrian Timen, Aura Hulscher, Marlies EJL |
author_facet | Belfroid, Evelien LA Hautvast, Jeannine Hilbink, Mirrian Timen, Aura Hulscher, Marlies EJL |
author_sort | Belfroid, Evelien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The performance of recommended control measures is necessary for quick and uniform infectious disease outbreak control. To assess whether these procedures are performed, a valid set of quality indicators (QIs) is required. The goal of this study was to select a set of key recommendations that can be systematically translated into QIs to measure the quality of infectious disease outbreak response from the perspective of disaster emergency responders and infectious disease control professionals. METHODS: Applying the Rand modified Delphi procedure, the following steps were taken to systematically select a set of key recommendations: extraction of recommendations from relevant literature; appraisal of the recommendations in terms of relevance through questionnaires to experts; expert meeting to discuss recommendations; prioritization of recommendations through a second questionnaire; and final expert meeting to approve the selected set. Infectious disease physicians and nurses, policymakers and communication experts participated in the expert group (n = 48). RESULTS: In total, 54 national and international publications were systematically searched for recommendations, yielding over 200 recommendations. The Rand modified Delphi procedure resulted in a set of 65 key recommendations. The key recommendations were categorized into 10 domains describing the whole response pathway from outbreak recognition to aftercare. CONCLUSION: This study provides a set of key recommendations that represents ‘good quality of response to an infectious disease outbreak’. These key recommendations can be systematically translated into QIs. Organizations and professionals involved in outbreak control can use these QIs to monitor the quality of response to infectious disease outbreaks and to assess in which domains improvement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4397715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43977152015-04-16 Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response Belfroid, Evelien LA Hautvast, Jeannine Hilbink, Mirrian Timen, Aura Hulscher, Marlies EJL BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The performance of recommended control measures is necessary for quick and uniform infectious disease outbreak control. To assess whether these procedures are performed, a valid set of quality indicators (QIs) is required. The goal of this study was to select a set of key recommendations that can be systematically translated into QIs to measure the quality of infectious disease outbreak response from the perspective of disaster emergency responders and infectious disease control professionals. METHODS: Applying the Rand modified Delphi procedure, the following steps were taken to systematically select a set of key recommendations: extraction of recommendations from relevant literature; appraisal of the recommendations in terms of relevance through questionnaires to experts; expert meeting to discuss recommendations; prioritization of recommendations through a second questionnaire; and final expert meeting to approve the selected set. Infectious disease physicians and nurses, policymakers and communication experts participated in the expert group (n = 48). RESULTS: In total, 54 national and international publications were systematically searched for recommendations, yielding over 200 recommendations. The Rand modified Delphi procedure resulted in a set of 65 key recommendations. The key recommendations were categorized into 10 domains describing the whole response pathway from outbreak recognition to aftercare. CONCLUSION: This study provides a set of key recommendations that represents ‘good quality of response to an infectious disease outbreak’. These key recommendations can be systematically translated into QIs. Organizations and professionals involved in outbreak control can use these QIs to monitor the quality of response to infectious disease outbreaks and to assess in which domains improvement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4397715/ /pubmed/25888491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x Text en © Belfroid et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Belfroid, Evelien LA Hautvast, Jeannine Hilbink, Mirrian Timen, Aura Hulscher, Marlies EJL Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
title | Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
title_full | Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
title_fullStr | Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
title_short | Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
title_sort | selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belfroidevelien selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse AT lahautvastjeannine selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse AT hilbinkmirrian selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse AT timenaura selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse AT hulschermarliesejl selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse |