Cargando…

Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response

BACKGROUND: The performance of recommended control measures is necessary for quick and uniform infectious disease outbreak control. To assess whether these procedures are performed, a valid set of quality indicators (QIs) is required. The goal of this study was to select a set of key recommendations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belfroid, Evelien, LA Hautvast, Jeannine, Hilbink, Mirrian, Timen, Aura, Hulscher, Marlies EJL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x
_version_ 1782366746998472704
author Belfroid, Evelien
LA Hautvast, Jeannine
Hilbink, Mirrian
Timen, Aura
Hulscher, Marlies EJL
author_facet Belfroid, Evelien
LA Hautvast, Jeannine
Hilbink, Mirrian
Timen, Aura
Hulscher, Marlies EJL
author_sort Belfroid, Evelien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The performance of recommended control measures is necessary for quick and uniform infectious disease outbreak control. To assess whether these procedures are performed, a valid set of quality indicators (QIs) is required. The goal of this study was to select a set of key recommendations that can be systematically translated into QIs to measure the quality of infectious disease outbreak response from the perspective of disaster emergency responders and infectious disease control professionals. METHODS: Applying the Rand modified Delphi procedure, the following steps were taken to systematically select a set of key recommendations: extraction of recommendations from relevant literature; appraisal of the recommendations in terms of relevance through questionnaires to experts; expert meeting to discuss recommendations; prioritization of recommendations through a second questionnaire; and final expert meeting to approve the selected set. Infectious disease physicians and nurses, policymakers and communication experts participated in the expert group (n = 48). RESULTS: In total, 54 national and international publications were systematically searched for recommendations, yielding over 200 recommendations. The Rand modified Delphi procedure resulted in a set of 65 key recommendations. The key recommendations were categorized into 10 domains describing the whole response pathway from outbreak recognition to aftercare. CONCLUSION: This study provides a set of key recommendations that represents ‘good quality of response to an infectious disease outbreak’. These key recommendations can be systematically translated into QIs. Organizations and professionals involved in outbreak control can use these QIs to monitor the quality of response to infectious disease outbreaks and to assess in which domains improvement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4397715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43977152015-04-16 Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response Belfroid, Evelien LA Hautvast, Jeannine Hilbink, Mirrian Timen, Aura Hulscher, Marlies EJL BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The performance of recommended control measures is necessary for quick and uniform infectious disease outbreak control. To assess whether these procedures are performed, a valid set of quality indicators (QIs) is required. The goal of this study was to select a set of key recommendations that can be systematically translated into QIs to measure the quality of infectious disease outbreak response from the perspective of disaster emergency responders and infectious disease control professionals. METHODS: Applying the Rand modified Delphi procedure, the following steps were taken to systematically select a set of key recommendations: extraction of recommendations from relevant literature; appraisal of the recommendations in terms of relevance through questionnaires to experts; expert meeting to discuss recommendations; prioritization of recommendations through a second questionnaire; and final expert meeting to approve the selected set. Infectious disease physicians and nurses, policymakers and communication experts participated in the expert group (n = 48). RESULTS: In total, 54 national and international publications were systematically searched for recommendations, yielding over 200 recommendations. The Rand modified Delphi procedure resulted in a set of 65 key recommendations. The key recommendations were categorized into 10 domains describing the whole response pathway from outbreak recognition to aftercare. CONCLUSION: This study provides a set of key recommendations that represents ‘good quality of response to an infectious disease outbreak’. These key recommendations can be systematically translated into QIs. Organizations and professionals involved in outbreak control can use these QIs to monitor the quality of response to infectious disease outbreaks and to assess in which domains improvement is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4397715/ /pubmed/25888491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x Text en © Belfroid et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belfroid, Evelien
LA Hautvast, Jeannine
Hilbink, Mirrian
Timen, Aura
Hulscher, Marlies EJL
Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
title Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
title_full Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
title_fullStr Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
title_full_unstemmed Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
title_short Selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
title_sort selection of key recommendations for quality indicators describing good quality outbreak response
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0896-x
work_keys_str_mv AT belfroidevelien selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse
AT lahautvastjeannine selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse
AT hilbinkmirrian selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse
AT timenaura selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse
AT hulschermarliesejl selectionofkeyrecommendationsforqualityindicatorsdescribinggoodqualityoutbreakresponse