Cargando…
Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7 |
_version_ | 1782366768413540352 |
---|---|
author | Rahn, Anne Christin Köpke, Sascha Kasper, Jürgen Vettorazzi, Eik Mühlhauser, Ingrid Heesen, Christoph |
author_facet | Rahn, Anne Christin Köpke, Sascha Kasper, Jürgen Vettorazzi, Eik Mühlhauser, Ingrid Heesen, Christoph |
author_sort | Rahn, Anne Christin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decision-making has become more complex for patients. Structured decision coaching, based on the principles of evidence-based patient information and shared decision-making, has the potential to facilitate participation of individuals in the decision-making process. This cluster randomised controlled trial follows the assumption that decision coaching by trained nurses, using evidence-based patient information and preference elicitation, will facilitate informed choices and induce higher decision quality, as well as better decisional adherence. METHODS/DESIGN: The decision coaching programme will be evaluated through an evaluator-blinded superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, including 300 patients with suspected or definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, facing an immunotherapy decision. The clusters are 12 multiple sclerosis outpatient clinics in Germany. Further, the trial will be accompanied by a mixed-methods process evaluation and a cost-effectiveness study. Nurses in the intervention group will be trained in shared decision-making, coaching, and evidence-based patient information principles. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive decision coaching (intervention group) with up to three face-to-face coaching sessions with a trained nurse (decision coach) or counselling as usual (control group). Patients in both groups will be given access to an evidence-based online information tool. The primary outcome is ‘informed choice’ after six months, assessed with the multi-dimensional measure of informed choice including the sub-dimensions risk knowledge (questionnaire), attitude concerning immunotherapy (questionnaire), and immunotherapy uptake (telephone survey). Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict, adherence to immunotherapy decisions, autonomy preference, planned behaviour, coping self-efficacy, and perceived involvement in coaching and decisional encounters. Safety outcomes are comprised of anxiety and depression and disease-specific quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness of a new model of patient decision support concerning MS-immunotherapy options. The delegation of treatment information provision from physicians to trained nurses bears the potential to change current doctor-focused practice in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN37929939), May 27, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4397890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43978902015-04-16 Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial Rahn, Anne Christin Köpke, Sascha Kasper, Jürgen Vettorazzi, Eik Mühlhauser, Ingrid Heesen, Christoph Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decision-making has become more complex for patients. Structured decision coaching, based on the principles of evidence-based patient information and shared decision-making, has the potential to facilitate participation of individuals in the decision-making process. This cluster randomised controlled trial follows the assumption that decision coaching by trained nurses, using evidence-based patient information and preference elicitation, will facilitate informed choices and induce higher decision quality, as well as better decisional adherence. METHODS/DESIGN: The decision coaching programme will be evaluated through an evaluator-blinded superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, including 300 patients with suspected or definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, facing an immunotherapy decision. The clusters are 12 multiple sclerosis outpatient clinics in Germany. Further, the trial will be accompanied by a mixed-methods process evaluation and a cost-effectiveness study. Nurses in the intervention group will be trained in shared decision-making, coaching, and evidence-based patient information principles. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive decision coaching (intervention group) with up to three face-to-face coaching sessions with a trained nurse (decision coach) or counselling as usual (control group). Patients in both groups will be given access to an evidence-based online information tool. The primary outcome is ‘informed choice’ after six months, assessed with the multi-dimensional measure of informed choice including the sub-dimensions risk knowledge (questionnaire), attitude concerning immunotherapy (questionnaire), and immunotherapy uptake (telephone survey). Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict, adherence to immunotherapy decisions, autonomy preference, planned behaviour, coping self-efficacy, and perceived involvement in coaching and decisional encounters. Safety outcomes are comprised of anxiety and depression and disease-specific quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness of a new model of patient decision support concerning MS-immunotherapy options. The delegation of treatment information provision from physicians to trained nurses bears the potential to change current doctor-focused practice in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN37929939), May 27, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4397890/ /pubmed/25872529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7 Text en © Rahn et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Rahn, Anne Christin Köpke, Sascha Kasper, Jürgen Vettorazzi, Eik Mühlhauser, Ingrid Heesen, Christoph Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy decision coaching in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (decims) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahnannechristin evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kopkesascha evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kasperjurgen evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vettorazzieik evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT muhlhauseringrid evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heesenchristoph evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |