Cargando…

Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahn, Anne Christin, Köpke, Sascha, Kasper, Jürgen, Vettorazzi, Eik, Mühlhauser, Ingrid, Heesen, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7
_version_ 1782366768413540352
author Rahn, Anne Christin
Köpke, Sascha
Kasper, Jürgen
Vettorazzi, Eik
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Heesen, Christoph
author_facet Rahn, Anne Christin
Köpke, Sascha
Kasper, Jürgen
Vettorazzi, Eik
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Heesen, Christoph
author_sort Rahn, Anne Christin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decision-making has become more complex for patients. Structured decision coaching, based on the principles of evidence-based patient information and shared decision-making, has the potential to facilitate participation of individuals in the decision-making process. This cluster randomised controlled trial follows the assumption that decision coaching by trained nurses, using evidence-based patient information and preference elicitation, will facilitate informed choices and induce higher decision quality, as well as better decisional adherence. METHODS/DESIGN: The decision coaching programme will be evaluated through an evaluator-blinded superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, including 300 patients with suspected or definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, facing an immunotherapy decision. The clusters are 12 multiple sclerosis outpatient clinics in Germany. Further, the trial will be accompanied by a mixed-methods process evaluation and a cost-effectiveness study. Nurses in the intervention group will be trained in shared decision-making, coaching, and evidence-based patient information principles. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive decision coaching (intervention group) with up to three face-to-face coaching sessions with a trained nurse (decision coach) or counselling as usual (control group). Patients in both groups will be given access to an evidence-based online information tool. The primary outcome is ‘informed choice’ after six months, assessed with the multi-dimensional measure of informed choice including the sub-dimensions risk knowledge (questionnaire), attitude concerning immunotherapy (questionnaire), and immunotherapy uptake (telephone survey). Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict, adherence to immunotherapy decisions, autonomy preference, planned behaviour, coping self-efficacy, and perceived involvement in coaching and decisional encounters. Safety outcomes are comprised of anxiety and depression and disease-specific quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness of a new model of patient decision support concerning MS-immunotherapy options. The delegation of treatment information provision from physicians to trained nurses bears the potential to change current doctor-focused practice in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN37929939), May 27, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4397890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43978902015-04-16 Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial Rahn, Anne Christin Köpke, Sascha Kasper, Jürgen Vettorazzi, Eik Mühlhauser, Ingrid Heesen, Christoph Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decision-making has become more complex for patients. Structured decision coaching, based on the principles of evidence-based patient information and shared decision-making, has the potential to facilitate participation of individuals in the decision-making process. This cluster randomised controlled trial follows the assumption that decision coaching by trained nurses, using evidence-based patient information and preference elicitation, will facilitate informed choices and induce higher decision quality, as well as better decisional adherence. METHODS/DESIGN: The decision coaching programme will be evaluated through an evaluator-blinded superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, including 300 patients with suspected or definite relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, facing an immunotherapy decision. The clusters are 12 multiple sclerosis outpatient clinics in Germany. Further, the trial will be accompanied by a mixed-methods process evaluation and a cost-effectiveness study. Nurses in the intervention group will be trained in shared decision-making, coaching, and evidence-based patient information principles. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will receive decision coaching (intervention group) with up to three face-to-face coaching sessions with a trained nurse (decision coach) or counselling as usual (control group). Patients in both groups will be given access to an evidence-based online information tool. The primary outcome is ‘informed choice’ after six months, assessed with the multi-dimensional measure of informed choice including the sub-dimensions risk knowledge (questionnaire), attitude concerning immunotherapy (questionnaire), and immunotherapy uptake (telephone survey). Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict, adherence to immunotherapy decisions, autonomy preference, planned behaviour, coping self-efficacy, and perceived involvement in coaching and decisional encounters. Safety outcomes are comprised of anxiety and depression and disease-specific quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness of a new model of patient decision support concerning MS-immunotherapy options. The delegation of treatment information provision from physicians to trained nurses bears the potential to change current doctor-focused practice in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN37929939), May 27, 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4397890/ /pubmed/25872529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7 Text en © Rahn et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rahn, Anne Christin
Köpke, Sascha
Kasper, Jürgen
Vettorazzi, Eik
Mühlhauser, Ingrid
Heesen, Christoph
Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy decision coaching in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (decims) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0611-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rahnannechristin evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kopkesascha evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kasperjurgen evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vettorazzieik evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT muhlhauseringrid evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT heesenchristoph evaluatorblindedtrialevaluatingnurseledimmunotherapydecisioncoachinginpersonswithrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisdecimsandaccompanyingprocessevaluationstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial