Cargando…
Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
Introduction The exclusive use of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear allows patients to effectively hear speech in a quiet environment. However, in environments with competing noise, the processing of multiple sounds becomes complex. In an attempt to promote binaural hearing in a noninvasive manner,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Publicações Ltda
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4399180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1352501 |
_version_ | 1782366905270534144 |
---|---|
author | Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt |
author_facet | Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt |
author_sort | Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The exclusive use of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear allows patients to effectively hear speech in a quiet environment. However, in environments with competing noise, the processing of multiple sounds becomes complex. In an attempt to promote binaural hearing in a noninvasive manner, the use of a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear is suggested for patients with a unilateral CI. Aims To identify the prevalence of hearing aid use in the contralateral ear in adults who already have a CI; to determine the reasons why some patients do not use contralateral hearing aids (CHAs); and to analyze the effects of residual hearing in CHA users. Materials and Methods This is a clinical study in 82 adult patients with CI implants who responded to a questionnaire designed to determine current use of CHA. Results In our patient sample, 70 CHA nonusers were identified. The prevalence of CHA users was determined to be 12% with a 95% confidence interval of 11 to 13%. About 58.2% of the CHA nonusers reported a lack of noticeable benefit even after wearing hearing aids, and 23.6% reported not having received the option to use a CHA. CHA users had a pure tone average of 107-dB hearing level, whereas CHA nonusers had a pure tone average of 117-dB hearing level. Conclusion The prevalence of the use of a CHA is low in our study. We attribute the low use of a CHA to either a lack of residual hearing or to a lack of benefit from the amplification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4399180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Thieme Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43991802015-05-19 Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Article Introduction The exclusive use of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear allows patients to effectively hear speech in a quiet environment. However, in environments with competing noise, the processing of multiple sounds becomes complex. In an attempt to promote binaural hearing in a noninvasive manner, the use of a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear is suggested for patients with a unilateral CI. Aims To identify the prevalence of hearing aid use in the contralateral ear in adults who already have a CI; to determine the reasons why some patients do not use contralateral hearing aids (CHAs); and to analyze the effects of residual hearing in CHA users. Materials and Methods This is a clinical study in 82 adult patients with CI implants who responded to a questionnaire designed to determine current use of CHA. Results In our patient sample, 70 CHA nonusers were identified. The prevalence of CHA users was determined to be 12% with a 95% confidence interval of 11 to 13%. About 58.2% of the CHA nonusers reported a lack of noticeable benefit even after wearing hearing aids, and 23.6% reported not having received the option to use a CHA. CHA users had a pure tone average of 107-dB hearing level, whereas CHA nonusers had a pure tone average of 117-dB hearing level. Conclusion The prevalence of the use of a CHA is low in our study. We attribute the low use of a CHA to either a lack of residual hearing or to a lack of benefit from the amplification. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4399180/ /pubmed/25992038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1352501 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants |
title | Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants |
title_full | Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants |
title_short | Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants |
title_sort | prevalence of contralateral hearing aid use in adults with cochlear implants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4399180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1352501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamaguchicintiatizue prevalenceofcontralateralhearingaiduseinadultswithcochlearimplants AT goffigomezmariavaleriaschmidt prevalenceofcontralateralhearingaiduseinadultswithcochlearimplants |