Cargando…

Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants

Introduction The exclusive use of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear allows patients to effectively hear speech in a quiet environment. However, in environments with competing noise, the processing of multiple sounds becomes complex. In an attempt to promote binaural hearing in a noninvasive manner,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue, Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Publicações Ltda 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4399180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1352501
_version_ 1782366905270534144
author Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue
Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt
author_facet Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue
Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt
author_sort Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue
collection PubMed
description Introduction The exclusive use of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear allows patients to effectively hear speech in a quiet environment. However, in environments with competing noise, the processing of multiple sounds becomes complex. In an attempt to promote binaural hearing in a noninvasive manner, the use of a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear is suggested for patients with a unilateral CI. Aims To identify the prevalence of hearing aid use in the contralateral ear in adults who already have a CI; to determine the reasons why some patients do not use contralateral hearing aids (CHAs); and to analyze the effects of residual hearing in CHA users. Materials and Methods This is a clinical study in 82 adult patients with CI implants who responded to a questionnaire designed to determine current use of CHA. Results In our patient sample, 70 CHA nonusers were identified. The prevalence of CHA users was determined to be 12% with a 95% confidence interval of 11 to 13%. About 58.2% of the CHA nonusers reported a lack of noticeable benefit even after wearing hearing aids, and 23.6% reported not having received the option to use a CHA. CHA users had a pure tone average of 107-dB hearing level, whereas CHA nonusers had a pure tone average of 117-dB hearing level. Conclusion The prevalence of the use of a CHA is low in our study. We attribute the low use of a CHA to either a lack of residual hearing or to a lack of benefit from the amplification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4399180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Thieme Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43991802015-05-19 Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Article Introduction The exclusive use of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear allows patients to effectively hear speech in a quiet environment. However, in environments with competing noise, the processing of multiple sounds becomes complex. In an attempt to promote binaural hearing in a noninvasive manner, the use of a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear is suggested for patients with a unilateral CI. Aims To identify the prevalence of hearing aid use in the contralateral ear in adults who already have a CI; to determine the reasons why some patients do not use contralateral hearing aids (CHAs); and to analyze the effects of residual hearing in CHA users. Materials and Methods This is a clinical study in 82 adult patients with CI implants who responded to a questionnaire designed to determine current use of CHA. Results In our patient sample, 70 CHA nonusers were identified. The prevalence of CHA users was determined to be 12% with a 95% confidence interval of 11 to 13%. About 58.2% of the CHA nonusers reported a lack of noticeable benefit even after wearing hearing aids, and 23.6% reported not having received the option to use a CHA. CHA users had a pure tone average of 107-dB hearing level, whereas CHA nonusers had a pure tone average of 117-dB hearing level. Conclusion The prevalence of the use of a CHA is low in our study. We attribute the low use of a CHA to either a lack of residual hearing or to a lack of benefit from the amplification. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4399180/ /pubmed/25992038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1352501 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Yamaguchi, Cintia Tizue
Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valéria Schmidt
Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
title Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
title_full Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
title_fullStr Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
title_short Prevalence of Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Adults with Cochlear Implants
title_sort prevalence of contralateral hearing aid use in adults with cochlear implants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4399180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25992038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1352501
work_keys_str_mv AT yamaguchicintiatizue prevalenceofcontralateralhearingaiduseinadultswithcochlearimplants
AT goffigomezmariavaleriaschmidt prevalenceofcontralateralhearingaiduseinadultswithcochlearimplants