Cargando…
COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4399534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19466253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015 |
_version_ | 1782366943196479488 |
---|---|
author | Ulusoy, Çaöry |
author_facet | Ulusoy, Çaöry |
author_sort | Ulusoy, Çaöry |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least timeconsuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4399534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43995342015-04-21 COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING Ulusoy, Çaöry J Appl Oral Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate (1) the effectiveness of one-step polishers on the surface morphology of enamel using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and compare their effects with conventional systems for residual adhesive removal; and (2) the time spent to remove resin remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metal brackets were bonded to the buccal surface of 80 freshly extracted human premolar teeth and received the same resin-removal methods to evaluate the time spent to remove resin remnants (n=10). The brackets were debonded and residual adhesive was removed using different systems. Fourty-five premolars, including the control group with intact enamel (n=5), were examined by SEM. RESULTS: 30-blade tungsten carbide burs were the least timeconsuming procedure. The best system in SEM study was the PoGo micro-polishers followed by Super-Snap Rainbow system. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of polishing systems on residual resin removal was dependent on the characteristics of the instruments in each system. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2009-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4399534/ /pubmed/19466253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ulusoy, Çaöry COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING |
title | COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING |
title_full | COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING |
title_fullStr | COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING |
title_full_unstemmed | COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING |
title_short | COMPARISON OF FINISHING AND POLISHING SYSTEMS FOR RESIDUAL RESIN REMOVAL AFTER DEBONDING |
title_sort | comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4399534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19466253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ulusoycaory comparisonoffinishingandpolishingsystemsforresidualresinremovalafterdebonding |