Cargando…

Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation

This study aims to investigate the quality difference of short echo time (TE) breathhold 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of the liver at 3.0T using the body and phased array coils, respectively. In total, 20 pairs of single-voxel proton spectra of the liver were acquired at 3.0T using the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Li, Gu, Shiyong, Feng, Qianjin, Liang, Changhong, Xin, Sherman Xuegang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122999
_version_ 1782366990686486528
author Xu, Li
Gu, Shiyong
Feng, Qianjin
Liang, Changhong
Xin, Sherman Xuegang
author_facet Xu, Li
Gu, Shiyong
Feng, Qianjin
Liang, Changhong
Xin, Sherman Xuegang
author_sort Xu, Li
collection PubMed
description This study aims to investigate the quality difference of short echo time (TE) breathhold 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of the liver at 3.0T using the body and phased array coils, respectively. In total, 20 pairs of single-voxel proton spectra of the liver were acquired at 3.0T using the phased array and body coils as receivers. Consecutive stacks of breathhold spectra were acquired using the point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) technique at a short TE of 30 ms and a repetition time (TR) of 1500 ms. The first spectroscopy sequence was “copied” for the second acquisition to ensure identical voxel positioning. The MRS prescan adjustments of shimming and water suppression, signal-to noise ratio (SNR), and major liver quantitative information were compared between paired spectra. Theoretical calculation of the SNR and homogeneity of the region of interest (ROI, 2 cm×2 cm×2 cm) using different coils loaded with 3D liver electromagnetic model of real human body was implemented in the theoretical analysis. The theoretical analysis showed that, inside the ROI, the SNR of the phase array coil was 2.8387 times larger than that of body coil and the homogeneity of the phase array coil and body coil was 80.10% and 93.86%, respectively. The experimental results showed excellent correlations between the paired data (all r > 0.86). Compared with the body coil group, the phased array group had slightly worse shimming effect and better SNR (all P values < .01). The discrepancy of the line width because of the different coils was approximately 0.8 Hz (0.00625 ppm). No significant differences of the major liver quantitative information of Cho/Lip2 height, Cho/Lip2 area, and lipid content were observed (all P values >0.05). The theoretical analysis and clinical experiment showed that the phased array coil was superior to the body coil with respect to 3.0T breathhold hepatic proton MRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4400076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44000762015-04-21 Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation Xu, Li Gu, Shiyong Feng, Qianjin Liang, Changhong Xin, Sherman Xuegang PLoS One Research Article This study aims to investigate the quality difference of short echo time (TE) breathhold 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of the liver at 3.0T using the body and phased array coils, respectively. In total, 20 pairs of single-voxel proton spectra of the liver were acquired at 3.0T using the phased array and body coils as receivers. Consecutive stacks of breathhold spectra were acquired using the point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) technique at a short TE of 30 ms and a repetition time (TR) of 1500 ms. The first spectroscopy sequence was “copied” for the second acquisition to ensure identical voxel positioning. The MRS prescan adjustments of shimming and water suppression, signal-to noise ratio (SNR), and major liver quantitative information were compared between paired spectra. Theoretical calculation of the SNR and homogeneity of the region of interest (ROI, 2 cm×2 cm×2 cm) using different coils loaded with 3D liver electromagnetic model of real human body was implemented in the theoretical analysis. The theoretical analysis showed that, inside the ROI, the SNR of the phase array coil was 2.8387 times larger than that of body coil and the homogeneity of the phase array coil and body coil was 80.10% and 93.86%, respectively. The experimental results showed excellent correlations between the paired data (all r > 0.86). Compared with the body coil group, the phased array group had slightly worse shimming effect and better SNR (all P values < .01). The discrepancy of the line width because of the different coils was approximately 0.8 Hz (0.00625 ppm). No significant differences of the major liver quantitative information of Cho/Lip2 height, Cho/Lip2 area, and lipid content were observed (all P values >0.05). The theoretical analysis and clinical experiment showed that the phased array coil was superior to the body coil with respect to 3.0T breathhold hepatic proton MRS. Public Library of Science 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4400076/ /pubmed/25881016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122999 Text en © 2015 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Li
Gu, Shiyong
Feng, Qianjin
Liang, Changhong
Xin, Sherman Xuegang
Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation
title Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation
title_full Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation
title_fullStr Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation
title_short Quantitative Study of Liver Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quality at 3T Using Body and Phased Array Coils with Physical Analysis and Clinical Evaluation
title_sort quantitative study of liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy quality at 3t using body and phased array coils with physical analysis and clinical evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25881016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122999
work_keys_str_mv AT xuli quantitativestudyoflivermagneticresonancespectroscopyqualityat3tusingbodyandphasedarraycoilswithphysicalanalysisandclinicalevaluation
AT gushiyong quantitativestudyoflivermagneticresonancespectroscopyqualityat3tusingbodyandphasedarraycoilswithphysicalanalysisandclinicalevaluation
AT fengqianjin quantitativestudyoflivermagneticresonancespectroscopyqualityat3tusingbodyandphasedarraycoilswithphysicalanalysisandclinicalevaluation
AT liangchanghong quantitativestudyoflivermagneticresonancespectroscopyqualityat3tusingbodyandphasedarraycoilswithphysicalanalysisandclinicalevaluation
AT xinshermanxuegang quantitativestudyoflivermagneticresonancespectroscopyqualityat3tusingbodyandphasedarraycoilswithphysicalanalysisandclinicalevaluation