Cargando…
Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
Abstract. Biodiversity data is being digitized and made available online at a rapidly increasing rate but current practices typically do not preserve linkages between these data, which impedes interoperation, provenance tracking, and assembly of larger datasets. For data associated with biocollectio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pensoft Publishers
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352 |
_version_ | 1782367013047369728 |
---|---|
author | Guralnick, Robert P. Cellinese, Nico Deck, John Pyle, Richard L. Kunze, John Penev, Lyubomir Walls, Ramona Hagedorn, Gregor Agosti, Donat Wieczorek, John Catapano, Terry Page, Roderic D. M. |
author_facet | Guralnick, Robert P. Cellinese, Nico Deck, John Pyle, Richard L. Kunze, John Penev, Lyubomir Walls, Ramona Hagedorn, Gregor Agosti, Donat Wieczorek, John Catapano, Terry Page, Roderic D. M. |
author_sort | Guralnick, Robert P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract. Biodiversity data is being digitized and made available online at a rapidly increasing rate but current practices typically do not preserve linkages between these data, which impedes interoperation, provenance tracking, and assembly of larger datasets. For data associated with biocollections, the biodiversity community has long recognized that an essential part of establishing and preserving linkages is to apply globally unique identifiers at the point when data are generated in the field and to persist these identifiers downstream, but this is seldom implemented in practice. There has neither been coalescence towards one single identifier solution (as in some other domains), nor even a set of recommended best practices and standards to support multiple identifier schemes sharing consistent responses. In order to further progress towards a broader community consensus, a group of biocollections and informatics experts assembled in Stockholm in October 2014 to discuss community next steps to overcome current roadblocks. The workshop participants divided into four groups focusing on: identifier practice in current field biocollections; identifier application for legacy biocollections; identifiers as applied to biodiversity data records as they are published and made available in semantically marked-up publications; and cross-cutting identifier solutions that bridge across these domains. The main outcome was consensus on key issues, including recognition of differences between legacy and new biocollections processes, the need for identifier metadata profiles that can report information on identifier persistence missions, and the unambiguous indication of the type of object associated with the identifier. Current identifier characteristics are also summarized, and an overview of available schemes and practices is provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4400380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44003802015-04-21 Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data Guralnick, Robert P. Cellinese, Nico Deck, John Pyle, Richard L. Kunze, John Penev, Lyubomir Walls, Ramona Hagedorn, Gregor Agosti, Donat Wieczorek, John Catapano, Terry Page, Roderic D. M. Zookeys Review Article Abstract. Biodiversity data is being digitized and made available online at a rapidly increasing rate but current practices typically do not preserve linkages between these data, which impedes interoperation, provenance tracking, and assembly of larger datasets. For data associated with biocollections, the biodiversity community has long recognized that an essential part of establishing and preserving linkages is to apply globally unique identifiers at the point when data are generated in the field and to persist these identifiers downstream, but this is seldom implemented in practice. There has neither been coalescence towards one single identifier solution (as in some other domains), nor even a set of recommended best practices and standards to support multiple identifier schemes sharing consistent responses. In order to further progress towards a broader community consensus, a group of biocollections and informatics experts assembled in Stockholm in October 2014 to discuss community next steps to overcome current roadblocks. The workshop participants divided into four groups focusing on: identifier practice in current field biocollections; identifier application for legacy biocollections; identifiers as applied to biodiversity data records as they are published and made available in semantically marked-up publications; and cross-cutting identifier solutions that bridge across these domains. The main outcome was consensus on key issues, including recognition of differences between legacy and new biocollections processes, the need for identifier metadata profiles that can report information on identifier persistence missions, and the unambiguous indication of the type of object associated with the identifier. Current identifier characteristics are also summarized, and an overview of available schemes and practices is provided. Pensoft Publishers 2015-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4400380/ /pubmed/25901117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352 Text en Robert P. Guralnick, Nico Cellinese, John Deck, Richard L. Pyle, John Kunze, Lyubomir Penev, Ramona Walls, Gregor Hagedorn, Donat Agosti, John Wieczorek, Terry Catapano, Roderic D. M. Page http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Guralnick, Robert P. Cellinese, Nico Deck, John Pyle, Richard L. Kunze, John Penev, Lyubomir Walls, Ramona Hagedorn, Gregor Agosti, Donat Wieczorek, John Catapano, Terry Page, Roderic D. M. Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data |
title | Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data |
title_full | Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data |
title_fullStr | Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data |
title_short | Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data |
title_sort | community next steps for making globally unique identifiers work for biocollections data |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guralnickrobertp communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT cellinesenico communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT deckjohn communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT pylerichardl communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT kunzejohn communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT penevlyubomir communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT wallsramona communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT hagedorngregor communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT agostidonat communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT wieczorekjohn communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT catapanoterry communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata AT pagerodericdm communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata |