Cargando…

Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data

Abstract. Biodiversity data is being digitized and made available online at a rapidly increasing rate but current practices typically do not preserve linkages between these data, which impedes interoperation, provenance tracking, and assembly of larger datasets. For data associated with biocollectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guralnick, Robert P., Cellinese, Nico, Deck, John, Pyle, Richard L., Kunze, John, Penev, Lyubomir, Walls, Ramona, Hagedorn, Gregor, Agosti, Donat, Wieczorek, John, Catapano, Terry, Page, Roderic D. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352
_version_ 1782367013047369728
author Guralnick, Robert P.
Cellinese, Nico
Deck, John
Pyle, Richard L.
Kunze, John
Penev, Lyubomir
Walls, Ramona
Hagedorn, Gregor
Agosti, Donat
Wieczorek, John
Catapano, Terry
Page, Roderic D. M.
author_facet Guralnick, Robert P.
Cellinese, Nico
Deck, John
Pyle, Richard L.
Kunze, John
Penev, Lyubomir
Walls, Ramona
Hagedorn, Gregor
Agosti, Donat
Wieczorek, John
Catapano, Terry
Page, Roderic D. M.
author_sort Guralnick, Robert P.
collection PubMed
description Abstract. Biodiversity data is being digitized and made available online at a rapidly increasing rate but current practices typically do not preserve linkages between these data, which impedes interoperation, provenance tracking, and assembly of larger datasets. For data associated with biocollections, the biodiversity community has long recognized that an essential part of establishing and preserving linkages is to apply globally unique identifiers at the point when data are generated in the field and to persist these identifiers downstream, but this is seldom implemented in practice. There has neither been coalescence towards one single identifier solution (as in some other domains), nor even a set of recommended best practices and standards to support multiple identifier schemes sharing consistent responses. In order to further progress towards a broader community consensus, a group of biocollections and informatics experts assembled in Stockholm in October 2014 to discuss community next steps to overcome current roadblocks. The workshop participants divided into four groups focusing on: identifier practice in current field biocollections; identifier application for legacy biocollections; identifiers as applied to biodiversity data records as they are published and made available in semantically marked-up publications; and cross-cutting identifier solutions that bridge across these domains. The main outcome was consensus on key issues, including recognition of differences between legacy and new biocollections processes, the need for identifier metadata profiles that can report information on identifier persistence missions, and the unambiguous indication of the type of object associated with the identifier. Current identifier characteristics are also summarized, and an overview of available schemes and practices is provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4400380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44003802015-04-21 Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data Guralnick, Robert P. Cellinese, Nico Deck, John Pyle, Richard L. Kunze, John Penev, Lyubomir Walls, Ramona Hagedorn, Gregor Agosti, Donat Wieczorek, John Catapano, Terry Page, Roderic D. M. Zookeys Review Article Abstract. Biodiversity data is being digitized and made available online at a rapidly increasing rate but current practices typically do not preserve linkages between these data, which impedes interoperation, provenance tracking, and assembly of larger datasets. For data associated with biocollections, the biodiversity community has long recognized that an essential part of establishing and preserving linkages is to apply globally unique identifiers at the point when data are generated in the field and to persist these identifiers downstream, but this is seldom implemented in practice. There has neither been coalescence towards one single identifier solution (as in some other domains), nor even a set of recommended best practices and standards to support multiple identifier schemes sharing consistent responses. In order to further progress towards a broader community consensus, a group of biocollections and informatics experts assembled in Stockholm in October 2014 to discuss community next steps to overcome current roadblocks. The workshop participants divided into four groups focusing on: identifier practice in current field biocollections; identifier application for legacy biocollections; identifiers as applied to biodiversity data records as they are published and made available in semantically marked-up publications; and cross-cutting identifier solutions that bridge across these domains. The main outcome was consensus on key issues, including recognition of differences between legacy and new biocollections processes, the need for identifier metadata profiles that can report information on identifier persistence missions, and the unambiguous indication of the type of object associated with the identifier. Current identifier characteristics are also summarized, and an overview of available schemes and practices is provided. Pensoft Publishers 2015-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4400380/ /pubmed/25901117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352 Text en Robert P. Guralnick, Nico Cellinese, John Deck, Richard L. Pyle, John Kunze, Lyubomir Penev, Ramona Walls, Gregor Hagedorn, Donat Agosti, John Wieczorek, Terry Catapano, Roderic D. M. Page http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Guralnick, Robert P.
Cellinese, Nico
Deck, John
Pyle, Richard L.
Kunze, John
Penev, Lyubomir
Walls, Ramona
Hagedorn, Gregor
Agosti, Donat
Wieczorek, John
Catapano, Terry
Page, Roderic D. M.
Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
title Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
title_full Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
title_fullStr Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
title_full_unstemmed Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
title_short Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data
title_sort community next steps for making globally unique identifiers work for biocollections data
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352
work_keys_str_mv AT guralnickrobertp communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT cellinesenico communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT deckjohn communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT pylerichardl communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT kunzejohn communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT penevlyubomir communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT wallsramona communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT hagedorngregor communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT agostidonat communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT wieczorekjohn communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT catapanoterry communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata
AT pagerodericdm communitynextstepsformakinggloballyuniqueidentifiersworkforbiocollectionsdata