Cargando…
Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 350 000 women in the UK experience perineal suturing following childbirth. For those women whose perineal wound dehisces, the management will vary according to individual practitioner's preferences. For most women, the wound will be managed expectantly (heal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22833651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001458 |
_version_ | 1782367073568030720 |
---|---|
author | Dudley, Lynn Kettle, Christine Carter, Pamela Thomas, Peter Ismail, Khaled M |
author_facet | Dudley, Lynn Kettle, Christine Carter, Pamela Thomas, Peter Ismail, Khaled M |
author_sort | Dudley, Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 350 000 women in the UK experience perineal suturing following childbirth. For those women whose perineal wound dehisces, the management will vary according to individual practitioner's preferences. For most women, the wound will be managed expectantly (healing by secondary intention), whereas others may be offered resuturing. However, there is limited scientific evidence and no clear guidelines to inform best practice. PREVIEW is a two-part study aiming to identify the best management strategy for dehisced perineal wounds, in terms of clinical effectiveness and women's preferences. METHODS/DESIGN: The main part of this study is a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial designed to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of resuturing versus expectant management for dehisced perineal wounds following childbirth and to feed into the design and feasibility of a larger definitive trial. 144 participants will be randomly allocated to either intervention. The primary outcome is the proportion of women with a healed perineal wound at 6–8 weeks from the trial entry. Secondary outcomes include perineal pain, breast feeding rates, dyspareunia and women's satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the wound healing at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post randomisation. Information will be collected using validated questionnaires. The second part of this study will be to conduct semistructured interviews with 12 study participants, aiming to capture information relating to their physical and psychological experiences following perineal wound dehiscence, assess the acceptability of the research plan and ensure that all outcomes relevant to women are included in the definitive trial. DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will inform a definitive randomised controlled trial that will provide conclusive evidence of what is the best management of perineal wound dehiscence. This will potentially lead to significant improvements in perineal care and will help to reduce the short- and long-term morbidity experienced by women. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: PREVIEW is registered with the International Standard Research for Clinical Trials (no: ISRCTN05754020) and adopted as a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Reproductive Health and Childbirth specialty group portfolio study UKCRN ID 9098. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4400731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44007312015-04-22 Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial Dudley, Lynn Kettle, Christine Carter, Pamela Thomas, Peter Ismail, Khaled M BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology BACKGROUND: Each year, approximately 350 000 women in the UK experience perineal suturing following childbirth. For those women whose perineal wound dehisces, the management will vary according to individual practitioner's preferences. For most women, the wound will be managed expectantly (healing by secondary intention), whereas others may be offered resuturing. However, there is limited scientific evidence and no clear guidelines to inform best practice. PREVIEW is a two-part study aiming to identify the best management strategy for dehisced perineal wounds, in terms of clinical effectiveness and women's preferences. METHODS/DESIGN: The main part of this study is a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial designed to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of resuturing versus expectant management for dehisced perineal wounds following childbirth and to feed into the design and feasibility of a larger definitive trial. 144 participants will be randomly allocated to either intervention. The primary outcome is the proportion of women with a healed perineal wound at 6–8 weeks from the trial entry. Secondary outcomes include perineal pain, breast feeding rates, dyspareunia and women's satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the wound healing at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post randomisation. Information will be collected using validated questionnaires. The second part of this study will be to conduct semistructured interviews with 12 study participants, aiming to capture information relating to their physical and psychological experiences following perineal wound dehiscence, assess the acceptability of the research plan and ensure that all outcomes relevant to women are included in the definitive trial. DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will inform a definitive randomised controlled trial that will provide conclusive evidence of what is the best management of perineal wound dehiscence. This will potentially lead to significant improvements in perineal care and will help to reduce the short- and long-term morbidity experienced by women. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: PREVIEW is registered with the International Standard Research for Clinical Trials (no: ISRCTN05754020) and adopted as a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Reproductive Health and Childbirth specialty group portfolio study UKCRN ID 9098. BMJ Group 2012-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4400731/ /pubmed/22833651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001458 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Dudley, Lynn Kettle, Christine Carter, Pamela Thomas, Peter Ismail, Khaled M Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title | Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal
delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and
feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal
delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and
feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal
delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and
feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal
delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and
feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal
delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): protocol for a pilot and
feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal
delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (preview): protocol for a pilot and
feasibility randomised controlled trial |
topic | Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4400731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22833651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dudleylynn perinealresuturingversusexpectantmanagementfollowingvaginaldeliverycomplicatedbyadehiscedwoundpreviewprotocolforapilotandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kettlechristine perinealresuturingversusexpectantmanagementfollowingvaginaldeliverycomplicatedbyadehiscedwoundpreviewprotocolforapilotandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT carterpamela perinealresuturingversusexpectantmanagementfollowingvaginaldeliverycomplicatedbyadehiscedwoundpreviewprotocolforapilotandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thomaspeter perinealresuturingversusexpectantmanagementfollowingvaginaldeliverycomplicatedbyadehiscedwoundpreviewprotocolforapilotandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ismailkhaledm perinealresuturingversusexpectantmanagementfollowingvaginaldeliverycomplicatedbyadehiscedwoundpreviewprotocolforapilotandfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial |