Cargando…

Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of plain packaging of cigarettes with enhanced graphic health warnings on Australian adolescents’ cognitive processing of warnings and awareness of different health consequences of smoking. METHODS: Cross-sectional school-based surveys conducted in 2011 (prior to int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Victoria, Williams, Tahlia, Faulkner, Agatha, Wakefield, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28407612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052085
_version_ 1782367135443451904
author White, Victoria
Williams, Tahlia
Faulkner, Agatha
Wakefield, Melanie
author_facet White, Victoria
Williams, Tahlia
Faulkner, Agatha
Wakefield, Melanie
author_sort White, Victoria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of plain packaging of cigarettes with enhanced graphic health warnings on Australian adolescents’ cognitive processing of warnings and awareness of different health consequences of smoking. METHODS: Cross-sectional school-based surveys conducted in 2011 (prior to introduction of standardised packaging, n=6338) and 2013 (7–12 months afterwards, n=5915). Students indicated frequency of attending to, reading, thinking or talking about warnings. Students viewed a list of diseases or health effects and were asked to indicate whether each was caused by smoking. Two—‘kidney and bladder cancer’ and ‘damages gums and teeth’—were new while the remainder had been promoted through previous health warnings and/or television campaigns. The 60% of students seeing a cigarette pack in previous 6 months in 2011 and 65% in 2013 form the sample for analysis. Changes in responses over time are examined. RESULTS: Awareness that smoking causes bladder cancer increased between 2011 and 2013 (p=0.002). There was high agreement with statements reflecting health effects featured in previous warnings or advertisements with little change over time. Exceptions to this were increases in the proportion agreeing that smoking was a leading cause of death (p<0.001) and causes blindness (p<0.001). The frequency of students reading, attending to, thinking or talking about the health warnings on cigarette packs did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledgement of negative health effects of smoking among Australian adolescents remains high. Apart from increased awareness of bladder cancer, new requirements for packaging and health warnings did not increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of warning information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4401340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44013402015-04-24 Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms? White, Victoria Williams, Tahlia Faulkner, Agatha Wakefield, Melanie Tob Control Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of plain packaging of cigarettes with enhanced graphic health warnings on Australian adolescents’ cognitive processing of warnings and awareness of different health consequences of smoking. METHODS: Cross-sectional school-based surveys conducted in 2011 (prior to introduction of standardised packaging, n=6338) and 2013 (7–12 months afterwards, n=5915). Students indicated frequency of attending to, reading, thinking or talking about warnings. Students viewed a list of diseases or health effects and were asked to indicate whether each was caused by smoking. Two—‘kidney and bladder cancer’ and ‘damages gums and teeth’—were new while the remainder had been promoted through previous health warnings and/or television campaigns. The 60% of students seeing a cigarette pack in previous 6 months in 2011 and 65% in 2013 form the sample for analysis. Changes in responses over time are examined. RESULTS: Awareness that smoking causes bladder cancer increased between 2011 and 2013 (p=0.002). There was high agreement with statements reflecting health effects featured in previous warnings or advertisements with little change over time. Exceptions to this were increases in the proportion agreeing that smoking was a leading cause of death (p<0.001) and causes blindness (p<0.001). The frequency of students reading, attending to, thinking or talking about the health warnings on cigarette packs did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledgement of negative health effects of smoking among Australian adolescents remains high. Apart from increased awareness of bladder cancer, new requirements for packaging and health warnings did not increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of warning information. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4401340/ /pubmed/28407612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052085 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
White, Victoria
Williams, Tahlia
Faulkner, Agatha
Wakefield, Melanie
Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
title Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
title_full Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
title_fullStr Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
title_full_unstemmed Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
title_short Do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
title_sort do larger graphic health warnings on standardised cigarette packs increase adolescents’ cognitive processing of consumer health information and beliefs about smoking-related harms?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28407612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052085
work_keys_str_mv AT whitevictoria dolargergraphichealthwarningsonstandardisedcigarettepacksincreaseadolescentscognitiveprocessingofconsumerhealthinformationandbeliefsaboutsmokingrelatedharms
AT williamstahlia dolargergraphichealthwarningsonstandardisedcigarettepacksincreaseadolescentscognitiveprocessingofconsumerhealthinformationandbeliefsaboutsmokingrelatedharms
AT faulkneragatha dolargergraphichealthwarningsonstandardisedcigarettepacksincreaseadolescentscognitiveprocessingofconsumerhealthinformationandbeliefsaboutsmokingrelatedharms
AT wakefieldmelanie dolargergraphichealthwarningsonstandardisedcigarettepacksincreaseadolescentscognitiveprocessingofconsumerhealthinformationandbeliefsaboutsmokingrelatedharms