Cargando…

Keratometric Index Obtained by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE: To determine the keratometric indices calculated based on parameters obtained by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). METHODS: The ratio of anterior corneal curvature to posterior corneal curvature (Ratio) and keratometric index (N) were calculated within central 3 mm zone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Yanjun, Stojanovic, Aleksander, Utheim, Tor Paaske, Chen, Xiangjun, Ræder, Sten, Huang, Jinhai, Wang, Qinmei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122441
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine the keratometric indices calculated based on parameters obtained by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). METHODS: The ratio of anterior corneal curvature to posterior corneal curvature (Ratio) and keratometric index (N) were calculated within central 3 mm zone with the RTVue FD-OCT (RTVue, Optovue, Inc.) in 186 untreated eyes, 60 post-LASIK/PRK eyes, and 39 keratoconus eyes. The total corneal powers were calculated using different keratometric indices: K(cal) based on the mean calculated keratometric index, K(1.3315) calculated by the keratometric index of 1.3315, and K(1.3375) calculated by the keratometric index of 1.3375. In addition, the total corneal powers based on Gaussian optics formula (K(actual)) were calculated. RESULTS: The means for Ratio in untreated controls, post-LASIK/PRK group and keratoconus group were 1.176 ± 0.022 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.172–1.179), 1.314 ± 0.042 (95%CI, 1.303–1.325) and 1.229 ± 0.118 (95%CI, 1.191–1.267), respectively. And the mean calculated keratometric index in untreated controls, post-LASIK/PRK group and keratoconus group were 1.3299 ± 0.00085 (95%CI, 1.3272–1.3308), 1.3242 ± 0.00171 (95%CI, 1.3238–1.3246) and 1.3277 ± 0.0046 (95%CI, 1.3263–1.3292), respectively. All the parameters were normally distributed. The differences between K(cal) and K(actual), K(1.3315) and K(actual), and K(1.3375) and K(actual) were 0.00 ± 0.11 D, 0.21 ± 0.11 D and 0.99 ± 0.12 D, respectively, in untreated controls; -0.01 ± 0.20 D, 0.85 ± 0.18 D and 1.56 ± 0.16 D, respectively, in post-LASIK/PRK group; and 0.03 ± 0.67 D, 0.56 ± 0.70 D and 1.40 ± 0.76 D, respectively, in keratoconus group. CONCLUSION: The calculated keratometric index is negatively related to the ratio of anterior corneal curvature to posterior corneal curvature in untreated, post-LASIK/PRK, and keratoconus eyes, respectively. Using the calculated keratometric index may improve the prediction accuracies of total corneal powers in untreated controls, but not in post-LASIK/PRK and keratoconus eyes.