Cargando…

Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have presented mixed findings on the inhibition ability in restrained eaters (REs) due to the limited amount of neural evidence and limitations of behavioral measures. The current study explores the neural correlations of the specific inhibition ability among successful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Fanchang, Zhang, Yan, Chen, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120522
_version_ 1782367195712454656
author Kong, Fanchang
Zhang, Yan
Chen, Hong
author_facet Kong, Fanchang
Zhang, Yan
Chen, Hong
author_sort Kong, Fanchang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have presented mixed findings on the inhibition ability in restrained eaters (REs) due to the limited amount of neural evidence and limitations of behavioral measures. The current study explores the neural correlations of the specific inhibition ability among successful restrained eaters (S-REs), unsuccessful restrained eaters (US-REs), and unrestrained eaters (UREs). METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Three groups of females (with 13 participants in each group) completed a two-choice Oddball task, while the event-related potentials (ERPs) are recorded synchronously. Results indicate that S-REs showed inhibition deficit in processing high-energy food cues whereas US-REs show inhibition deficit in processing both low- and high-energy food cues. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that S-REs and US-REs differ in terms of specific inhibition ability and that enhanced inhibition is essential to a successful diet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4401785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44017852015-04-21 Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task Kong, Fanchang Zhang, Yan Chen, Hong PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have presented mixed findings on the inhibition ability in restrained eaters (REs) due to the limited amount of neural evidence and limitations of behavioral measures. The current study explores the neural correlations of the specific inhibition ability among successful restrained eaters (S-REs), unsuccessful restrained eaters (US-REs), and unrestrained eaters (UREs). METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Three groups of females (with 13 participants in each group) completed a two-choice Oddball task, while the event-related potentials (ERPs) are recorded synchronously. Results indicate that S-REs showed inhibition deficit in processing high-energy food cues whereas US-REs show inhibition deficit in processing both low- and high-energy food cues. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that S-REs and US-REs differ in terms of specific inhibition ability and that enhanced inhibition is essential to a successful diet. Public Library of Science 2015-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4401785/ /pubmed/25886063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120522 Text en © 2015 Kong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kong, Fanchang
Zhang, Yan
Chen, Hong
Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task
title Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task
title_full Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task
title_fullStr Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task
title_full_unstemmed Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task
title_short Inhibition Ability of Food Cues between Successful and Unsuccessful Restrained Eaters: A Two-Choice Oddball Task
title_sort inhibition ability of food cues between successful and unsuccessful restrained eaters: a two-choice oddball task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120522
work_keys_str_mv AT kongfanchang inhibitionabilityoffoodcuesbetweensuccessfulandunsuccessfulrestrainedeatersatwochoiceoddballtask
AT zhangyan inhibitionabilityoffoodcuesbetweensuccessfulandunsuccessfulrestrainedeatersatwochoiceoddballtask
AT chenhong inhibitionabilityoffoodcuesbetweensuccessfulandunsuccessfulrestrainedeatersatwochoiceoddballtask