Cargando…
Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of cardiocerebral resuscitation (CCR) or AHA/ERC 2005 Resuscitation Guidelines improved patient outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to older guidelines. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23036985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001273 |
_version_ | 1782367199626788864 |
---|---|
author | Salmen, Marcus Ewy, Gordon A Sasson, Comilla |
author_facet | Salmen, Marcus Ewy, Gordon A Sasson, Comilla |
author_sort | Salmen, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of cardiocerebral resuscitation (CCR) or AHA/ERC 2005 Resuscitation Guidelines improved patient outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to older guidelines. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases. We also hand-searched study references and consulted experts. STUDY SELECTION: Design: randomised controlled trials and observational studies. POPULATION: OHCA patients, age >17 years. COMPARATORS: ‘Control’ protocol versus ‘Study’ protocol. ‘Control’ protocol defined as AHA/ERC 2000 Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). ‘Study’ protocol defined as AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines for CPR, or a CCR protocol. OUTCOME: Survival to hospital discharge. QUALITY: High-quality or medium-quality studies, as measured by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale using predefined categories. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies met inclusion criteria. All the three studies using CCR demonstrated significantly improved survival compared to use of AHA 2000 Guidelines, as did five of the nine studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines. Pooled data demonstrate that use of a CCR protocol has an unadjusted OR of 2.26 (95% CI 1.64 to 3.12) for survival to hospital discharge among all cardiac arrest patients. Among witnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) patients, CCR increased survival by an OR of 2.98 (95% CI 1.92 to 4.62). Studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines showed an overall trend towards increased survival, but significant heterogeneity existed among these studies. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate an association with improved survival from OHCA when CCR protocols or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines are compared to use of older guidelines. In the subgroup of patients with witnessed VF/VT, there was a threefold increase in OHCA survival when CCR was used. CCR appears to be a promising resuscitation protocol for Emergency Medical Services providers in increasing survival from OHCA. Future research will need to be conducted to directly compare AHA/ERC 2010 Guidelines with the CCR approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4401819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44018192015-04-22 Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis Salmen, Marcus Ewy, Gordon A Sasson, Comilla BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of cardiocerebral resuscitation (CCR) or AHA/ERC 2005 Resuscitation Guidelines improved patient outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to older guidelines. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases. We also hand-searched study references and consulted experts. STUDY SELECTION: Design: randomised controlled trials and observational studies. POPULATION: OHCA patients, age >17 years. COMPARATORS: ‘Control’ protocol versus ‘Study’ protocol. ‘Control’ protocol defined as AHA/ERC 2000 Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). ‘Study’ protocol defined as AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines for CPR, or a CCR protocol. OUTCOME: Survival to hospital discharge. QUALITY: High-quality or medium-quality studies, as measured by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale using predefined categories. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies met inclusion criteria. All the three studies using CCR demonstrated significantly improved survival compared to use of AHA 2000 Guidelines, as did five of the nine studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines. Pooled data demonstrate that use of a CCR protocol has an unadjusted OR of 2.26 (95% CI 1.64 to 3.12) for survival to hospital discharge among all cardiac arrest patients. Among witnessed ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) patients, CCR increased survival by an OR of 2.98 (95% CI 1.92 to 4.62). Studies using AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines showed an overall trend towards increased survival, but significant heterogeneity existed among these studies. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate an association with improved survival from OHCA when CCR protocols or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines are compared to use of older guidelines. In the subgroup of patients with witnessed VF/VT, there was a threefold increase in OHCA survival when CCR was used. CCR appears to be a promising resuscitation protocol for Emergency Medical Services providers in increasing survival from OHCA. Future research will need to be conducted to directly compare AHA/ERC 2010 Guidelines with the CCR approach. BMJ Group 2012-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4401819/ /pubmed/23036985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001273 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Salmen, Marcus Ewy, Gordon A Sasson, Comilla Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or AHA/ERC 2005 Guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | use of cardiocerebral resuscitation or aha/erc 2005 guidelines is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23036985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salmenmarcus useofcardiocerebralresuscitationorahaerc2005guidelinesisassociatedwithimprovedsurvivalfromoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ewygordona useofcardiocerebralresuscitationorahaerc2005guidelinesisassociatedwithimprovedsurvivalfromoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sassoncomilla useofcardiocerebralresuscitationorahaerc2005guidelinesisassociatedwithimprovedsurvivalfromoutofhospitalcardiacarrestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |