Cargando…
Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Our meta-analysis performed a systematic evaluation on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of tumour vaccines for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Coc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006321 |
_version_ | 1782367202414952448 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Min Cao, Jun-Xia Liu, Yi-Shan Xu, Bei-Lei Li, Duo Zhang, Xiao-Yan Li, Jun-Li Liu, Jin-Long Wang, Hai-Bo Wang, Zheng-Xu |
author_facet | Wang, Min Cao, Jun-Xia Liu, Yi-Shan Xu, Bei-Lei Li, Duo Zhang, Xiao-Yan Li, Jun-Li Liu, Jin-Long Wang, Hai-Bo Wang, Zheng-Xu |
author_sort | Wang, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our meta-analysis performed a systematic evaluation on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of tumour vaccines for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 until January 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: RCT were included; the control arm had to receive either placebo or chemotherapy or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The quality of the data from individual papers was assessed for overall survival (OS), clinical response rate and side effects. RESULTS: Overall, 11 RCT of advanced NSCLC with a total of 3986 patients were conducted for meta-analysis. The results showed that the vaccine arm significantly extended primary endpoint median overall survival compared with control group (p<0.00001) (HR 0.760; 95% CI 0.644 to 0.896; p=0.001). Three subgroup patients with tumour vaccine at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates also gained significant benefits compared with their corresponding control group (p=0.0004, 0.03 and 0.19, respectively). Besides, a significant improvement in median time to progression (TTP), median progression-free survival (PFS) and a trend of improvement in objective response rate were observed after tumour vaccine treatment (p=0.001, 0.005 and 0.05, respectively; median PFS HR 0.842; 95% CI 0.744 to 0.954; p=0.007). A few severe adverse effects occurred in the tumour vaccine group, but fewer side effects were observed in the vaccine group compared with the control group (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, NSCLC tumour vaccines markedly prolong median OS (p<0.00001), median TTP (p=0.001) and median PFS (p=0.005), improve clinical response rate (p=0.05) and lessen adverse side effects (p<0.00001). Our meta-analysis suggests tumour vaccines improve the efficacy of the treatment, and also provide superiority in treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC among a variety of immunotherapy strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4401843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44018432015-04-29 Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis Wang, Min Cao, Jun-Xia Liu, Yi-Shan Xu, Bei-Lei Li, Duo Zhang, Xiao-Yan Li, Jun-Li Liu, Jin-Long Wang, Hai-Bo Wang, Zheng-Xu BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: Our meta-analysis performed a systematic evaluation on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of tumour vaccines for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct and EMBASE were searched from January 1980 until January 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: RCT were included; the control arm had to receive either placebo or chemotherapy or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The quality of the data from individual papers was assessed for overall survival (OS), clinical response rate and side effects. RESULTS: Overall, 11 RCT of advanced NSCLC with a total of 3986 patients were conducted for meta-analysis. The results showed that the vaccine arm significantly extended primary endpoint median overall survival compared with control group (p<0.00001) (HR 0.760; 95% CI 0.644 to 0.896; p=0.001). Three subgroup patients with tumour vaccine at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates also gained significant benefits compared with their corresponding control group (p=0.0004, 0.03 and 0.19, respectively). Besides, a significant improvement in median time to progression (TTP), median progression-free survival (PFS) and a trend of improvement in objective response rate were observed after tumour vaccine treatment (p=0.001, 0.005 and 0.05, respectively; median PFS HR 0.842; 95% CI 0.744 to 0.954; p=0.007). A few severe adverse effects occurred in the tumour vaccine group, but fewer side effects were observed in the vaccine group compared with the control group (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, NSCLC tumour vaccines markedly prolong median OS (p<0.00001), median TTP (p=0.001) and median PFS (p=0.005), improve clinical response rate (p=0.05) and lessen adverse side effects (p<0.00001). Our meta-analysis suggests tumour vaccines improve the efficacy of the treatment, and also provide superiority in treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC among a variety of immunotherapy strategies. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4401843/ /pubmed/25872936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006321 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Oncology Wang, Min Cao, Jun-Xia Liu, Yi-Shan Xu, Bei-Lei Li, Duo Zhang, Xiao-Yan Li, Jun-Li Liu, Jin-Long Wang, Hai-Bo Wang, Zheng-Xu Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
title | Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluation of tumour vaccine immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4401843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25872936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangmin evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT caojunxia evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT liuyishan evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT xubeilei evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT liduo evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT zhangxiaoyan evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT lijunli evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT liujinlong evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT wanghaibo evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis AT wangzhengxu evaluationoftumourvaccineimmunotherapyforthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicmetaanalysis |