Cargando…
Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
We previously reported that nab-paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy resulted in low relapse rates (13%) and excellent survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.382 |
_version_ | 1782367222529785856 |
---|---|
author | Schell, Amy Ley, Jessica Wu, Ningying Trinkaus, Kathryn Wildes, Tanya Marya Michel, Loren Thorstad, Wade Gay, Hiram Lewis, James Rich, Jason Diaz, Jason Paniello, Randal C Nussenbaum, Brian Adkins, Douglas R |
author_facet | Schell, Amy Ley, Jessica Wu, Ningying Trinkaus, Kathryn Wildes, Tanya Marya Michel, Loren Thorstad, Wade Gay, Hiram Lewis, James Rich, Jason Diaz, Jason Paniello, Randal C Nussenbaum, Brian Adkins, Douglas R |
author_sort | Schell, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | We previously reported that nab-paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy resulted in low relapse rates (13%) and excellent survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between patients given nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with cetuximab (APF-C) and historical controls given docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with cetuximab (TPF-C). Patients with locally advanced HNSCC were treated with APF-C (n = 30) or TPF-C (n = 38). After 3 cycles of IC, patients were scheduled to receive cisplatin concurrent with definitive radiotherapy. T and N classification and smoking history were similar between the two groups and within p16-positive and p16-negative subsets. The median duration of follow-up for living patients in the APF-C group was 43.5 (range: 30–58) months versus 52 (range: 13–84) months for TPF-C. The 2-year DSS for patients treated with APF-C was 96.7% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 85.2%, 99.8%] and with TPF-C was 77.6% (CI: 62.6%, 89.7%) (P = 0.0004). Disease progression that resulted in death was more frequent in the TPF-C group (39%) compared with the APF-C group (3%) when adjusted for competing risks of death from other causes (Gray's test, P = 0.0004). In p16 positive OPSCC, the 2-year DSS for APF-C was 100% and for TPF-C was 74.6% (CI: 47.4%, 94.6%) (P = 0.0019) and the 2-year OS for APF-C was 94.1% (CI: 65.0%, 99.2%) and for TPF-C was 74.6% (CI: 39.8%, 91.1%) (P = 0.013). In p16 negative HNSCC, the 2-year DSS for APF-C was 91.7% (CI: 67.6%, 99.6%) and for TPF-C was 82.6% (CI: 64.4%, 94.8%) (P = 0.092). A 2-year DSS and OS were significantly better with a nab-paclitaxel-based IC regimen (APF-C) compared to a docetaxel-based IC regimen (TPF-C) in p16-positive OPSCC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4402061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44020612015-04-23 Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Schell, Amy Ley, Jessica Wu, Ningying Trinkaus, Kathryn Wildes, Tanya Marya Michel, Loren Thorstad, Wade Gay, Hiram Lewis, James Rich, Jason Diaz, Jason Paniello, Randal C Nussenbaum, Brian Adkins, Douglas R Cancer Med Cancer Research We previously reported that nab-paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy resulted in low relapse rates (13%) and excellent survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between patients given nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with cetuximab (APF-C) and historical controls given docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with cetuximab (TPF-C). Patients with locally advanced HNSCC were treated with APF-C (n = 30) or TPF-C (n = 38). After 3 cycles of IC, patients were scheduled to receive cisplatin concurrent with definitive radiotherapy. T and N classification and smoking history were similar between the two groups and within p16-positive and p16-negative subsets. The median duration of follow-up for living patients in the APF-C group was 43.5 (range: 30–58) months versus 52 (range: 13–84) months for TPF-C. The 2-year DSS for patients treated with APF-C was 96.7% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 85.2%, 99.8%] and with TPF-C was 77.6% (CI: 62.6%, 89.7%) (P = 0.0004). Disease progression that resulted in death was more frequent in the TPF-C group (39%) compared with the APF-C group (3%) when adjusted for competing risks of death from other causes (Gray's test, P = 0.0004). In p16 positive OPSCC, the 2-year DSS for APF-C was 100% and for TPF-C was 74.6% (CI: 47.4%, 94.6%) (P = 0.0019) and the 2-year OS for APF-C was 94.1% (CI: 65.0%, 99.2%) and for TPF-C was 74.6% (CI: 39.8%, 91.1%) (P = 0.013). In p16 negative HNSCC, the 2-year DSS for APF-C was 91.7% (CI: 67.6%, 99.6%) and for TPF-C was 82.6% (CI: 64.4%, 94.8%) (P = 0.092). A 2-year DSS and OS were significantly better with a nab-paclitaxel-based IC regimen (APF-C) compared to a docetaxel-based IC regimen (TPF-C) in p16-positive OPSCC. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-04 2015-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4402061/ /pubmed/25619559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.382 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cancer Research Schell, Amy Ley, Jessica Wu, Ningying Trinkaus, Kathryn Wildes, Tanya Marya Michel, Loren Thorstad, Wade Gay, Hiram Lewis, James Rich, Jason Diaz, Jason Paniello, Randal C Nussenbaum, Brian Adkins, Douglas R Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
title | Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
title_full | Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
title_fullStr | Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
title_full_unstemmed | Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
title_short | Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
title_sort | nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck |
topic | Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25619559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schellamy nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT leyjessica nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT wuningying nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT trinkauskathryn nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT wildestanyamarya nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT michelloren nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT thorstadwade nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT gayhiram nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT lewisjames nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT richjason nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT diazjason nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT paniellorandalc nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT nussenbaumbrian nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT adkinsdouglasr nabpaclitaxelbasedcomparedtodocetaxelbasedinductionchemotherapyregimensforlocallyadvancedsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneck |