Cargando…

Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study

Background. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate intranasal buserelin for luteal phase support and compare its efficacy with standard vaginal progesterone in IVF/ICSI antagonist cycles. Methods. This is a prospective, randomized, open, parallel group study. Forty patients underwent ovarian hy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirard, Céline, Loumaye, Ernest, Laurent, Pascale, Wyns, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/727569
_version_ 1782367238484918272
author Pirard, Céline
Loumaye, Ernest
Laurent, Pascale
Wyns, Christine
author_facet Pirard, Céline
Loumaye, Ernest
Laurent, Pascale
Wyns, Christine
author_sort Pirard, Céline
collection PubMed
description Background. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate intranasal buserelin for luteal phase support and compare its efficacy with standard vaginal progesterone in IVF/ICSI antagonist cycles. Methods. This is a prospective, randomized, open, parallel group study. Forty patients underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin under pituitary inhibition with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, while ovulation trigger and luteal support were achieved using intranasal GnRH agonist (group A). Twenty patients had their cycle downregulated with buserelin and stimulated with hMG, while ovulation trigger was achieved using 10,000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin with luteal support by intravaginal progesterone (group B). Results. No difference was observed in estradiol levels. Progesterone levels on day 5 were significantly lower in group A. However, significantly higher levels of luteinizing hormone were observed in group A during the entire luteal phase. Pregnancy rates (31.4% versus 22.2%), implantation rates (22% versus 15.4%), and clinical pregnancy rates (25.7% versus 16.7%) were not statistically different between groups, although a trend towards higher rates was observed in group A. No luteal phase lasting less than 10 days was recorded in either group. Conclusion. Intranasal administration of buserelin is effective for providing luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI antagonist protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4402188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44021882015-05-05 Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study Pirard, Céline Loumaye, Ernest Laurent, Pascale Wyns, Christine Int J Endocrinol Research Article Background. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate intranasal buserelin for luteal phase support and compare its efficacy with standard vaginal progesterone in IVF/ICSI antagonist cycles. Methods. This is a prospective, randomized, open, parallel group study. Forty patients underwent ovarian hyperstimulation with human menopausal gonadotropin under pituitary inhibition with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, while ovulation trigger and luteal support were achieved using intranasal GnRH agonist (group A). Twenty patients had their cycle downregulated with buserelin and stimulated with hMG, while ovulation trigger was achieved using 10,000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin with luteal support by intravaginal progesterone (group B). Results. No difference was observed in estradiol levels. Progesterone levels on day 5 were significantly lower in group A. However, significantly higher levels of luteinizing hormone were observed in group A during the entire luteal phase. Pregnancy rates (31.4% versus 22.2%), implantation rates (22% versus 15.4%), and clinical pregnancy rates (25.7% versus 16.7%) were not statistically different between groups, although a trend towards higher rates was observed in group A. No luteal phase lasting less than 10 days was recorded in either group. Conclusion. Intranasal administration of buserelin is effective for providing luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI antagonist protocols. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4402188/ /pubmed/25945092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/727569 Text en Copyright © 2015 Céline Pirard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pirard, Céline
Loumaye, Ernest
Laurent, Pascale
Wyns, Christine
Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
title Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
title_full Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
title_fullStr Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
title_short Contribution to More Patient-Friendly ART Treatment: Efficacy of Continuous Low-Dose GnRH Agonist as the Only Luteal Support—Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study
title_sort contribution to more patient-friendly art treatment: efficacy of continuous low-dose gnrh agonist as the only luteal support—results of a prospective, randomized, comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/727569
work_keys_str_mv AT pirardceline contributiontomorepatientfriendlyarttreatmentefficacyofcontinuouslowdosegnrhagonistastheonlylutealsupportresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT loumayeernest contributiontomorepatientfriendlyarttreatmentefficacyofcontinuouslowdosegnrhagonistastheonlylutealsupportresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT laurentpascale contributiontomorepatientfriendlyarttreatmentefficacyofcontinuouslowdosegnrhagonistastheonlylutealsupportresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy
AT wynschristine contributiontomorepatientfriendlyarttreatmentefficacyofcontinuouslowdosegnrhagonistastheonlylutealsupportresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativestudy