Cargando…

Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study

This paper presents an approach of identifying prosthetic knee movements through pattern recognition of mechanical responses at the internal socket's wall. A quadrilateral double socket was custom made and instrumented with two force sensing resistors (FSR) attached to specific anterior and pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Sayed, Amr M., Hamzaid, Nur Azah, Tan, Kenneth Y. S., Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/923286
_version_ 1782367239187464192
author El-Sayed, Amr M.
Hamzaid, Nur Azah
Tan, Kenneth Y. S.
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
author_facet El-Sayed, Amr M.
Hamzaid, Nur Azah
Tan, Kenneth Y. S.
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
author_sort El-Sayed, Amr M.
collection PubMed
description This paper presents an approach of identifying prosthetic knee movements through pattern recognition of mechanical responses at the internal socket's wall. A quadrilateral double socket was custom made and instrumented with two force sensing resistors (FSR) attached to specific anterior and posterior sites of the socket's wall. A second setup was established by attaching three piezoelectric sensors at the anterior distal, anterior proximal, and posterior sites. Gait cycle and locomotion movements such as stair ascent and sit to stand were adopted to characterize the validity of the technique. FSR and piezoelectric outputs were measured with reference to the knee angle during each phase. Piezoelectric sensors could identify the movement of midswing and terminal swing, pre-full standing, pull-up at gait, sit to stand, and stair ascent. In contrast, FSR could estimate the gait cycle stance and swing phases and identify the pre-full standing at sit to stand. FSR showed less variation during sit to stand and stair ascent to sensitively represent the different movement states. The study highlighted the capacity of using in-socket sensors for knee movement identification. In addition, it validated the efficacy of the system and warrants further investigation with more amputee subjects and different sockets types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4402191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44021912015-05-05 Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study El-Sayed, Amr M. Hamzaid, Nur Azah Tan, Kenneth Y. S. Abu Osman, Noor Azuan ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This paper presents an approach of identifying prosthetic knee movements through pattern recognition of mechanical responses at the internal socket's wall. A quadrilateral double socket was custom made and instrumented with two force sensing resistors (FSR) attached to specific anterior and posterior sites of the socket's wall. A second setup was established by attaching three piezoelectric sensors at the anterior distal, anterior proximal, and posterior sites. Gait cycle and locomotion movements such as stair ascent and sit to stand were adopted to characterize the validity of the technique. FSR and piezoelectric outputs were measured with reference to the knee angle during each phase. Piezoelectric sensors could identify the movement of midswing and terminal swing, pre-full standing, pull-up at gait, sit to stand, and stair ascent. In contrast, FSR could estimate the gait cycle stance and swing phases and identify the pre-full standing at sit to stand. FSR showed less variation during sit to stand and stair ascent to sensitively represent the different movement states. The study highlighted the capacity of using in-socket sensors for knee movement identification. In addition, it validated the efficacy of the system and warrants further investigation with more amputee subjects and different sockets types. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4402191/ /pubmed/25945365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/923286 Text en Copyright © 2015 Amr M. El-Sayed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
El-Sayed, Amr M.
Hamzaid, Nur Azah
Tan, Kenneth Y. S.
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_full Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_short Detection of Prosthetic Knee Movement Phases via In-Socket Sensors: A Feasibility Study
title_sort detection of prosthetic knee movement phases via in-socket sensors: a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/923286
work_keys_str_mv AT elsayedamrm detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy
AT hamzaidnurazah detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy
AT tankennethys detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy
AT abuosmannoorazuan detectionofprosthetickneemovementphasesviainsocketsensorsafeasibilitystudy