Cargando…
Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up
Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation fa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/271436 |
_version_ | 1782367277810712576 |
---|---|
author | Castagnoli, Chiara Cecchi, Francesca Del Canto, Antonio Paperini, Anita Boni, Roberta Pasquini, Guido Vannetti, Federica Macchi, Claudio |
author_facet | Castagnoli, Chiara Cecchi, Francesca Del Canto, Antonio Paperini, Anita Boni, Roberta Pasquini, Guido Vannetti, Federica Macchi, Claudio |
author_sort | Castagnoli, Chiara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants. Adult patients with diagnosis of nonspecific, chronic (>6 months) low back pain. Interventions. Both treatments consisted of 15 sessions of one hour each, twice a week including patient education. Measures. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire to evaluate disability, and Numeric Analog Scale for pain. A score change >30% was considered clinically significant. Past treatments, use of medications, smoking habits, height, weight, profession, and physical activity were also recorded on baseline, on discharge, and 1 year after discharge (resp., T0, T1, and T2). Results. At T0 103 patients with cLBP (51 cases and 52 controls) were recruited. The treatment (T1) has been completed by 79 (T1) of which 60 then carried out the 1-year follow-up (T2). Both GPR and PT at T1 were associated with a significant statistical and clinical improvement in pain and function, compared to T0. At T2, only pain in GPR still registered a statistically significant improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4402563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44025632015-05-05 Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up Castagnoli, Chiara Cecchi, Francesca Del Canto, Antonio Paperini, Anita Boni, Roberta Pasquini, Guido Vannetti, Federica Macchi, Claudio ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study Objective. Comparing global postural reeducation (GPR) to a standard physiotherapy treatment (PT) based on active exercises, stretching, and massaging for improving pain and function in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Design. Prospective controlled study. Setting. Outpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants. Adult patients with diagnosis of nonspecific, chronic (>6 months) low back pain. Interventions. Both treatments consisted of 15 sessions of one hour each, twice a week including patient education. Measures. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire to evaluate disability, and Numeric Analog Scale for pain. A score change >30% was considered clinically significant. Past treatments, use of medications, smoking habits, height, weight, profession, and physical activity were also recorded on baseline, on discharge, and 1 year after discharge (resp., T0, T1, and T2). Results. At T0 103 patients with cLBP (51 cases and 52 controls) were recruited. The treatment (T1) has been completed by 79 (T1) of which 60 then carried out the 1-year follow-up (T2). Both GPR and PT at T1 were associated with a significant statistical and clinical improvement in pain and function, compared to T0. At T2, only pain in GPR still registered a statistically significant improvement. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4402563/ /pubmed/25945360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/271436 Text en Copyright © 2015 Chiara Castagnoli et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Castagnoli, Chiara Cecchi, Francesca Del Canto, Antonio Paperini, Anita Boni, Roberta Pasquini, Guido Vannetti, Federica Macchi, Claudio Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up |
title | Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up |
title_full | Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up |
title_short | Effects in Short and Long Term of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study with One-Year Follow-Up |
title_sort | effects in short and long term of global postural reeducation (gpr) on chronic low back pain: a controlled study with one-year follow-up |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/271436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castagnolichiara effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT cecchifrancesca effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT delcantoantonio effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT paperinianita effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT boniroberta effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT pasquiniguido effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT vannettifederica effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup AT macchiclaudio effectsinshortandlongtermofglobalposturalreeducationgpronchroniclowbackpainacontrolledstudywithoneyearfollowup |