Cargando…

Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas

Purpose. To evaluate correlation between tomographic gradation of keratoconus (KC) and its corresponding air-puff induced biomechanical response. Methods. Corneal tomography and biomechanics were measured with Scheimpflug imaging in 44 normal and 92 KC corneas. Deformation waveform was also analyzed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Rohit, Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A., Srivatsa, Purnima, Jayadev, Chaitra, Pahuja, Natasha, Akkali, Mukunda C., Sinha Roy, Abhijit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/294197
_version_ 1782367280068296704
author Shetty, Rohit
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
Srivatsa, Purnima
Jayadev, Chaitra
Pahuja, Natasha
Akkali, Mukunda C.
Sinha Roy, Abhijit
author_facet Shetty, Rohit
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
Srivatsa, Purnima
Jayadev, Chaitra
Pahuja, Natasha
Akkali, Mukunda C.
Sinha Roy, Abhijit
author_sort Shetty, Rohit
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To evaluate correlation between tomographic gradation of keratoconus (KC) and its corresponding air-puff induced biomechanical response. Methods. Corneal tomography and biomechanics were measured with Scheimpflug imaging in 44 normal and 92 KC corneas. Deformation waveform was also analyzed with Fourier series. A custom KC severity scale was used from 1 to 3 with 3 as the most severe grade. Tomographic and biomechanical variables were assessed among the grades. Sensitivity and specificity of the variables were assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Results. Curvature variables were significantly different between normal and disease (P < 0.05) and among grades (P < 0.05). Biomechanical variables were significantly different between normal and disease (P<0.05) but similar among grades 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). All variables had an area under the ROC curve greater than 0.5. The root mean square of the Fourier cosine coefficients had the best ROC (0.92, cut-off: 0.027, sensitivity: 83%, specificity: 88.6%). Spearman correlation coefficient was significant between most variables (P < 0.05). However, tomographic segregation of keratoconus did not result in concomitant biomechanical segregation of the grades. Conclusions. There was lack of significant biomechanical difference between mild disease grades, despite progressive corneal thinning. Mathematical models that estimate corneal modulus from air-puff deformation may be more useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4402575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44025752015-05-05 Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas Shetty, Rohit Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. Srivatsa, Purnima Jayadev, Chaitra Pahuja, Natasha Akkali, Mukunda C. Sinha Roy, Abhijit Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. To evaluate correlation between tomographic gradation of keratoconus (KC) and its corresponding air-puff induced biomechanical response. Methods. Corneal tomography and biomechanics were measured with Scheimpflug imaging in 44 normal and 92 KC corneas. Deformation waveform was also analyzed with Fourier series. A custom KC severity scale was used from 1 to 3 with 3 as the most severe grade. Tomographic and biomechanical variables were assessed among the grades. Sensitivity and specificity of the variables were assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Results. Curvature variables were significantly different between normal and disease (P < 0.05) and among grades (P < 0.05). Biomechanical variables were significantly different between normal and disease (P<0.05) but similar among grades 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). All variables had an area under the ROC curve greater than 0.5. The root mean square of the Fourier cosine coefficients had the best ROC (0.92, cut-off: 0.027, sensitivity: 83%, specificity: 88.6%). Spearman correlation coefficient was significant between most variables (P < 0.05). However, tomographic segregation of keratoconus did not result in concomitant biomechanical segregation of the grades. Conclusions. There was lack of significant biomechanical difference between mild disease grades, despite progressive corneal thinning. Mathematical models that estimate corneal modulus from air-puff deformation may be more useful. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4402575/ /pubmed/25945330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/294197 Text en Copyright © 2015 Rohit Shetty et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shetty, Rohit
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
Srivatsa, Purnima
Jayadev, Chaitra
Pahuja, Natasha
Akkali, Mukunda C.
Sinha Roy, Abhijit
Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas
title Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas
title_full Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas
title_fullStr Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas
title_short Understanding the Correlation between Tomographic and Biomechanical Severity of Keratoconic Corneas
title_sort understanding the correlation between tomographic and biomechanical severity of keratoconic corneas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4402575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25945330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/294197
work_keys_str_mv AT shettyrohit understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas
AT nuijtsrudymma understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas
AT srivatsapurnima understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas
AT jayadevchaitra understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas
AT pahujanatasha understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas
AT akkalimukundac understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas
AT sinharoyabhijit understandingthecorrelationbetweentomographicandbiomechanicalseverityofkeratoconiccorneas