Cargando…
Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills
Trusting people requires evaluating them to assess their trustworthiness. Evaluating a stranger’s intentions is likely to be one method of assessing trustworthiness. The present study tested the hypothesis that judgments of trustworthiness are associated with mind reading skills, also called theory...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25941495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00052 |
_version_ | 1782367320187863040 |
---|---|
author | Prevost, Marie Brodeur, Mathieu Onishi, Kristine H. Lepage, Martin Gold, Ian |
author_facet | Prevost, Marie Brodeur, Mathieu Onishi, Kristine H. Lepage, Martin Gold, Ian |
author_sort | Prevost, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Trusting people requires evaluating them to assess their trustworthiness. Evaluating a stranger’s intentions is likely to be one method of assessing trustworthiness. The present study tested the hypothesis that judgments of trustworthiness are associated with mind reading skills, also called theory of mind (ToM). We tested a group of healthy participants and a group of patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Both groups made ToM judgments and judged the trustworthiness of strangers. Participants were also assessed for their disposition to trust as well as levels of paranoid belief. As anticipated, healthy participants had a normal ToM scores and patients with paranoid schizophrenia had poor ToM scores. In paranoid patients, better ability to read others’ minds was associated with judging others as more trustworthy, while the reverse was found in the healthy participants (better mind reading was associated with judging others as less trustworthy), suggesting a non-linear relationship between trust in others and being able to read their intentions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4403288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44032882015-05-04 Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills Prevost, Marie Brodeur, Mathieu Onishi, Kristine H. Lepage, Martin Gold, Ian Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Trusting people requires evaluating them to assess their trustworthiness. Evaluating a stranger’s intentions is likely to be one method of assessing trustworthiness. The present study tested the hypothesis that judgments of trustworthiness are associated with mind reading skills, also called theory of mind (ToM). We tested a group of healthy participants and a group of patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Both groups made ToM judgments and judged the trustworthiness of strangers. Participants were also assessed for their disposition to trust as well as levels of paranoid belief. As anticipated, healthy participants had a normal ToM scores and patients with paranoid schizophrenia had poor ToM scores. In paranoid patients, better ability to read others’ minds was associated with judging others as more trustworthy, while the reverse was found in the healthy participants (better mind reading was associated with judging others as less trustworthy), suggesting a non-linear relationship between trust in others and being able to read their intentions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4403288/ /pubmed/25941495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00052 Text en Copyright © 2015 Prevost, Brodeur, Onishi, Lepage and Gold. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Prevost, Marie Brodeur, Mathieu Onishi, Kristine H. Lepage, Martin Gold, Ian Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills |
title | Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills |
title_full | Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills |
title_fullStr | Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills |
title_full_unstemmed | Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills |
title_short | Judging Strangers’ Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills |
title_sort | judging strangers’ trustworthiness is associated with theory of mind skills |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25941495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prevostmarie judgingstrangerstrustworthinessisassociatedwiththeoryofmindskills AT brodeurmathieu judgingstrangerstrustworthinessisassociatedwiththeoryofmindskills AT onishikristineh judgingstrangerstrustworthinessisassociatedwiththeoryofmindskills AT lepagemartin judgingstrangerstrustworthinessisassociatedwiththeoryofmindskills AT goldian judgingstrangerstrustworthinessisassociatedwiththeoryofmindskills |