Cargando…

Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?

BACKGROUND: We explored the impact of transient cART started during the primary HIV-infection (PHI) on the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption, by comparison with treatment initiation during the chronic phase of HIV infection (CHI). METHODS: We analyzed data on 1450 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krastinova, Evguenia, Seng, Remonie, Lechenadec, Jerome, Panjo, Henri, Essat, Asma, Makhloufi, Djamila, Obadia, Martine, Bernard, Louis, Goujard, Cecile, Meyer, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0892-1
_version_ 1782367372634488832
author Krastinova, Evguenia
Seng, Remonie
Lechenadec, Jerome
Panjo, Henri
Essat, Asma
Makhloufi, Djamila
Obadia, Martine
Bernard, Louis
Goujard, Cecile
Meyer, Laurence
author_facet Krastinova, Evguenia
Seng, Remonie
Lechenadec, Jerome
Panjo, Henri
Essat, Asma
Makhloufi, Djamila
Obadia, Martine
Bernard, Louis
Goujard, Cecile
Meyer, Laurence
author_sort Krastinova, Evguenia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We explored the impact of transient cART started during the primary HIV-infection (PHI) on the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption, by comparison with treatment initiation during the chronic phase of HIV infection (CHI). METHODS: We analyzed data on 1450 patients enrolled during PHI in the ANRS PRIMO cohort between 1996 and 2013. “Treatment resumption” was defined as at least 3 months of resumed treatment following interruption of at least 1 month of treatment initiated during PHI. “Treatment initiation during CHI” was defined as cART initiated ≥6 months after PHI. The virologic response to resumed treatment and to treatment initiated during CHI was analyzed with survival models. The CD4 cell count dynamics was modeled with piecewise linear mixed models. RESULTS: 136 patients who resumed cART for a median (IQR) of 32 (18–51) months were compared with 377 patients who started cART during CHI for a median of 45 (22–57) months. Most patients (97%) achieved HIV-RNA <50 cp/mL after similar times in the two groups. The CD4 cell count rose similarly in the two groups during the first 12 months. However, after 12 months, patients who started cART during CHI had a better immunological response than those who resumed cART (p = 0.01); therefore, at 36 months, the gains in √CD4 cells/mm(3) and CD4% were significantly greater in patients who started treatment during CHI. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that interruption of cART started during PHI has a significant, albeit modest negative impact on CD4 cell recovery on cART resumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4403722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44037222015-04-21 Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption? Krastinova, Evguenia Seng, Remonie Lechenadec, Jerome Panjo, Henri Essat, Asma Makhloufi, Djamila Obadia, Martine Bernard, Louis Goujard, Cecile Meyer, Laurence BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: We explored the impact of transient cART started during the primary HIV-infection (PHI) on the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption, by comparison with treatment initiation during the chronic phase of HIV infection (CHI). METHODS: We analyzed data on 1450 patients enrolled during PHI in the ANRS PRIMO cohort between 1996 and 2013. “Treatment resumption” was defined as at least 3 months of resumed treatment following interruption of at least 1 month of treatment initiated during PHI. “Treatment initiation during CHI” was defined as cART initiated ≥6 months after PHI. The virologic response to resumed treatment and to treatment initiated during CHI was analyzed with survival models. The CD4 cell count dynamics was modeled with piecewise linear mixed models. RESULTS: 136 patients who resumed cART for a median (IQR) of 32 (18–51) months were compared with 377 patients who started cART during CHI for a median of 45 (22–57) months. Most patients (97%) achieved HIV-RNA <50 cp/mL after similar times in the two groups. The CD4 cell count rose similarly in the two groups during the first 12 months. However, after 12 months, patients who started cART during CHI had a better immunological response than those who resumed cART (p = 0.01); therefore, at 36 months, the gains in √CD4 cells/mm(3) and CD4% were significantly greater in patients who started treatment during CHI. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that interruption of cART started during PHI has a significant, albeit modest negative impact on CD4 cell recovery on cART resumption. BioMed Central 2015-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4403722/ /pubmed/25888386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0892-1 Text en © Krastinova et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krastinova, Evguenia
Seng, Remonie
Lechenadec, Jerome
Panjo, Henri
Essat, Asma
Makhloufi, Djamila
Obadia, Martine
Bernard, Louis
Goujard, Cecile
Meyer, Laurence
Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?
title Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?
title_full Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?
title_fullStr Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?
title_full_unstemmed Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?
title_short Does transient cART started during primary HIV infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cART resumption?
title_sort does transient cart started during primary hiv infection undermine the long-term immunologic and virologic response on cart resumption?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25888386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0892-1
work_keys_str_mv AT krastinovaevguenia doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT sengremonie doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT lechenadecjerome doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT panjohenri doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT essatasma doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT makhloufidjamila doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT obadiamartine doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT bernardlouis doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT goujardcecile doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT meyerlaurence doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption
AT doestransientcartstartedduringprimaryhivinfectionunderminethelongtermimmunologicandvirologicresponseoncartresumption