Cargando…
Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Nebulized antibiotics are a promising new treatment option for ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, more evidence of the benefit of this therapy is required. METHODS: The Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, CENTRAL,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0868-y |
_version_ | 1782367391815041024 |
---|---|
author | Zampieri, Fernando G Nassar Jr, Antonio P Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Taniguchi, Leandro U Torres, Antoni Ranzani, Otavio T |
author_facet | Zampieri, Fernando G Nassar Jr, Antonio P Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Taniguchi, Leandro U Torres, Antoni Ranzani, Otavio T |
author_sort | Zampieri, Fernando G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Nebulized antibiotics are a promising new treatment option for ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, more evidence of the benefit of this therapy is required. METHODS: The Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, CENTRAL, Scielo and Lilacs databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials or matched observational studies that compared nebulized antibiotics with or without intravenous antibiotics to intravenous antibiotics alone for ventilator-associated pneumonia treatment. Two reviewers independently collected data and assessed outcomes and risk of bias. The primary outcome was clinical cure. Secondary outcomes were microbiological cure, ICU and hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay and adverse events. A mixed-effect model meta-analysis was performed. Trial sequential analysis was used for the main outcome of interest. RESULTS: Twelve studies were analyzed, including six randomized controlled trials. For the main outcome analysis, 812 patients were included. Nebulized antibiotics were associated with higher rates of clinical cure (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05 to 1.43; I(2) = 34%; D(2) = 45%). Nebulized antibiotics were not associated with microbiological cure (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.62; I(2) = 62.5), mortality (RR = 0.90; CI 95%, 0.76 to 1.08; I(2) = 0%), duration of mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference = −0.10 days; 95% CI, −1.22 to 1.00; I(2) = 96.5%), ICU length of stay (standardized mean difference = 0.14 days; 95% CI, −0.46 to 0.73; I(2) = 89.2%) or renal toxicity (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.57; I(2) = 15.6%). Regarding the primary outcome, the number of patients included was below the information size required for a definitive conclusion by trial sequential analysis; therefore, our results regarding this parameter are inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized antibiotics seem to be associated with higher rates of clinical cure in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, the apparent benefit in the clinical cure rate observed by traditional meta-analysis does not persist after trial sequential analysis. Additional high-quality studies on this subject are highly warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014009116. Registered 29 March 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0868-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4403838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44038382015-04-21 Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zampieri, Fernando G Nassar Jr, Antonio P Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Taniguchi, Leandro U Torres, Antoni Ranzani, Otavio T Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Nebulized antibiotics are a promising new treatment option for ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, more evidence of the benefit of this therapy is required. METHODS: The Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, CENTRAL, Scielo and Lilacs databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials or matched observational studies that compared nebulized antibiotics with or without intravenous antibiotics to intravenous antibiotics alone for ventilator-associated pneumonia treatment. Two reviewers independently collected data and assessed outcomes and risk of bias. The primary outcome was clinical cure. Secondary outcomes were microbiological cure, ICU and hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay and adverse events. A mixed-effect model meta-analysis was performed. Trial sequential analysis was used for the main outcome of interest. RESULTS: Twelve studies were analyzed, including six randomized controlled trials. For the main outcome analysis, 812 patients were included. Nebulized antibiotics were associated with higher rates of clinical cure (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05 to 1.43; I(2) = 34%; D(2) = 45%). Nebulized antibiotics were not associated with microbiological cure (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.62; I(2) = 62.5), mortality (RR = 0.90; CI 95%, 0.76 to 1.08; I(2) = 0%), duration of mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference = −0.10 days; 95% CI, −1.22 to 1.00; I(2) = 96.5%), ICU length of stay (standardized mean difference = 0.14 days; 95% CI, −0.46 to 0.73; I(2) = 89.2%) or renal toxicity (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.57; I(2) = 15.6%). Regarding the primary outcome, the number of patients included was below the information size required for a definitive conclusion by trial sequential analysis; therefore, our results regarding this parameter are inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized antibiotics seem to be associated with higher rates of clinical cure in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, the apparent benefit in the clinical cure rate observed by traditional meta-analysis does not persist after trial sequential analysis. Additional high-quality studies on this subject are highly warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014009116. Registered 29 March 2014 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0868-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-07 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4403838/ /pubmed/25887226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0868-y Text en © Zampieri et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zampieri, Fernando G Nassar Jr, Antonio P Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Taniguchi, Leandro U Torres, Antoni Ranzani, Otavio T Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | nebulized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0868-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zampierifernandog nebulizedantibioticsforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nassarjrantoniop nebulizedantibioticsforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gusmaofloresdimitri nebulizedantibioticsforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taniguchileandrou nebulizedantibioticsforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT torresantoni nebulizedantibioticsforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ranzaniotaviot nebulizedantibioticsforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |