Cargando…

Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs

The detection of network motifs has recently become an important part of network analysis across all disciplines. In this work, we detected and analyzed network motifs from undirected and directed networks of several different disciplines, including biological network, social network, ecological net...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Ngoc Tam L, DeLuccia, Luke, McDonald, Aidan F, Huang, Chun-Hsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983553
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S23619
_version_ 1782367403135467520
author Tran, Ngoc Tam L
DeLuccia, Luke
McDonald, Aidan F
Huang, Chun-Hsi
author_facet Tran, Ngoc Tam L
DeLuccia, Luke
McDonald, Aidan F
Huang, Chun-Hsi
author_sort Tran, Ngoc Tam L
collection PubMed
description The detection of network motifs has recently become an important part of network analysis across all disciplines. In this work, we detected and analyzed network motifs from undirected and directed networks of several different disciplines, including biological network, social network, ecological network, as well as other networks such as airlines, power grid, and co-purchase of political books networks. Our analysis revealed that undirected networks are similar at the basic three and four nodes, while the analysis of directed networks revealed the distinction between networks of different disciplines. The study showed that larger motifs contained the three-node motif as a subgraph. Topological analysis revealed that similar networks have similar small motifs, but as the motif size increases, differences arise. Pearson correlation coefficient showed strong positive relationship between some undirected networks but inverse relationship between some directed networks. The study suggests that the three-node motif is a building block of larger motifs. It also suggests that undirected networks share similar low-level structures. Moreover, similar networks share similar small motifs, but larger motifs define the unique structure of individuals. Pearson correlation coefficient suggests that protein structure networks, dolphin social network, and co-authorships in network science belong to a superfamily. In addition, yeast protein–protein interaction network, primary school contact network, Zachary’s karate club network, and co-purchase of political books network can be classified into a superfamily.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4403903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44039032015-05-15 Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs Tran, Ngoc Tam L DeLuccia, Luke McDonald, Aidan F Huang, Chun-Hsi Bioinform Biol Insights Original Research The detection of network motifs has recently become an important part of network analysis across all disciplines. In this work, we detected and analyzed network motifs from undirected and directed networks of several different disciplines, including biological network, social network, ecological network, as well as other networks such as airlines, power grid, and co-purchase of political books networks. Our analysis revealed that undirected networks are similar at the basic three and four nodes, while the analysis of directed networks revealed the distinction between networks of different disciplines. The study showed that larger motifs contained the three-node motif as a subgraph. Topological analysis revealed that similar networks have similar small motifs, but as the motif size increases, differences arise. Pearson correlation coefficient showed strong positive relationship between some undirected networks but inverse relationship between some directed networks. The study suggests that the three-node motif is a building block of larger motifs. It also suggests that undirected networks share similar low-level structures. Moreover, similar networks share similar small motifs, but larger motifs define the unique structure of individuals. Pearson correlation coefficient suggests that protein structure networks, dolphin social network, and co-authorships in network science belong to a superfamily. In addition, yeast protein–protein interaction network, primary school contact network, Zachary’s karate club network, and co-purchase of political books network can be classified into a superfamily. Libertas Academica 2015-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4403903/ /pubmed/25983553 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S23619 Text en © 2015 the authors, publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Limited. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tran, Ngoc Tam L
DeLuccia, Luke
McDonald, Aidan F
Huang, Chun-Hsi
Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs
title Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs
title_full Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs
title_fullStr Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs
title_short Cross-Disciplinary Detection and Analysis of Network Motifs
title_sort cross-disciplinary detection and analysis of network motifs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983553
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S23619
work_keys_str_mv AT tranngoctaml crossdisciplinarydetectionandanalysisofnetworkmotifs
AT deluccialuke crossdisciplinarydetectionandanalysisofnetworkmotifs
AT mcdonaldaidanf crossdisciplinarydetectionandanalysisofnetworkmotifs
AT huangchunhsi crossdisciplinarydetectionandanalysisofnetworkmotifs