Cargando…

Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level

BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements are needed in clinical practice, intervention studies and health examination surveys. Blood pressure measurements are sensitive: their accuracy can be affected by measurement environment, behaviour of the subject, measurement procedures, devices used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolonen, Hanna, Koponen, Päivikki, Naska, Androniki, Männistö, Satu, Broda, Grazyna, Palosaari, Tarja, Kuulasmaa, Kari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0020-3
_version_ 1782367410207064064
author Tolonen, Hanna
Koponen, Päivikki
Naska, Androniki
Männistö, Satu
Broda, Grazyna
Palosaari, Tarja
Kuulasmaa, Kari
author_facet Tolonen, Hanna
Koponen, Päivikki
Naska, Androniki
Männistö, Satu
Broda, Grazyna
Palosaari, Tarja
Kuulasmaa, Kari
author_sort Tolonen, Hanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements are needed in clinical practice, intervention studies and health examination surveys. Blood pressure measurements are sensitive: their accuracy can be affected by measurement environment, behaviour of the subject, measurement procedures, devices used for the measurement and the observer. To minimize errors in blood pressure measurement, a standardized measurement protocol is needed. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey (EHES) Pilot project was conducted in 2009–2012. A pilot health examination survey was conducted in 12 countries using a standardized protocol. The measurement protocols used in each survey, training provided for the measurers, measurement data, and observations during site visits were collected and evaluated to assess the level of standardization. RESULTS: The EHES measurement protocol for blood pressure was followed accurately in all 12 pilot surveys. Most of the surveys succeeded in organizing a quiet and comfortable measurement environment, and staff instructed survey participants appropriately before examination visits. In all surveys, blood pressure was measured three times, from the right arm in a sitting posture. The biggest variation was in the device used for the blood pressure measurement. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach a high level of standardization for blood pressure measurements across countries and over time. A detailed, standardized measurement protocol, and adequate training and monitoring during the fieldwork and centrally organized quality assessment of the data are needed. The recent EU regulation banning the sale of mercury sphygmomanometer in European Union Member States has set new challenges for the standardization of measurement devices since the validity of oscillometric measurements is device-specific and performance of aneroid devices depends very much on calibration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4403933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44039332015-04-21 Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level Tolonen, Hanna Koponen, Päivikki Naska, Androniki Männistö, Satu Broda, Grazyna Palosaari, Tarja Kuulasmaa, Kari BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements are needed in clinical practice, intervention studies and health examination surveys. Blood pressure measurements are sensitive: their accuracy can be affected by measurement environment, behaviour of the subject, measurement procedures, devices used for the measurement and the observer. To minimize errors in blood pressure measurement, a standardized measurement protocol is needed. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey (EHES) Pilot project was conducted in 2009–2012. A pilot health examination survey was conducted in 12 countries using a standardized protocol. The measurement protocols used in each survey, training provided for the measurers, measurement data, and observations during site visits were collected and evaluated to assess the level of standardization. RESULTS: The EHES measurement protocol for blood pressure was followed accurately in all 12 pilot surveys. Most of the surveys succeeded in organizing a quiet and comfortable measurement environment, and staff instructed survey participants appropriately before examination visits. In all surveys, blood pressure was measured three times, from the right arm in a sitting posture. The biggest variation was in the device used for the blood pressure measurement. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach a high level of standardization for blood pressure measurements across countries and over time. A detailed, standardized measurement protocol, and adequate training and monitoring during the fieldwork and centrally organized quality assessment of the data are needed. The recent EU regulation banning the sale of mercury sphygmomanometer in European Union Member States has set new challenges for the standardization of measurement devices since the validity of oscillometric measurements is device-specific and performance of aneroid devices depends very much on calibration. BioMed Central 2015-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4403933/ /pubmed/25880766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0020-3 Text en © Tolonen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tolonen, Hanna
Koponen, Päivikki
Naska, Androniki
Männistö, Satu
Broda, Grazyna
Palosaari, Tarja
Kuulasmaa, Kari
Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
title Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
title_full Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
title_fullStr Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
title_short Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
title_sort challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0020-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tolonenhanna challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT koponenpaivikki challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT naskaandroniki challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT mannistosatu challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT brodagrazyna challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT palosaaritarja challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT kuulasmaakari challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel
AT challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel