Cargando…
Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level
BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements are needed in clinical practice, intervention studies and health examination surveys. Blood pressure measurements are sensitive: their accuracy can be affected by measurement environment, behaviour of the subject, measurement procedures, devices used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0020-3 |
_version_ | 1782367410207064064 |
---|---|
author | Tolonen, Hanna Koponen, Päivikki Naska, Androniki Männistö, Satu Broda, Grazyna Palosaari, Tarja Kuulasmaa, Kari |
author_facet | Tolonen, Hanna Koponen, Päivikki Naska, Androniki Männistö, Satu Broda, Grazyna Palosaari, Tarja Kuulasmaa, Kari |
author_sort | Tolonen, Hanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements are needed in clinical practice, intervention studies and health examination surveys. Blood pressure measurements are sensitive: their accuracy can be affected by measurement environment, behaviour of the subject, measurement procedures, devices used for the measurement and the observer. To minimize errors in blood pressure measurement, a standardized measurement protocol is needed. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey (EHES) Pilot project was conducted in 2009–2012. A pilot health examination survey was conducted in 12 countries using a standardized protocol. The measurement protocols used in each survey, training provided for the measurers, measurement data, and observations during site visits were collected and evaluated to assess the level of standardization. RESULTS: The EHES measurement protocol for blood pressure was followed accurately in all 12 pilot surveys. Most of the surveys succeeded in organizing a quiet and comfortable measurement environment, and staff instructed survey participants appropriately before examination visits. In all surveys, blood pressure was measured three times, from the right arm in a sitting posture. The biggest variation was in the device used for the blood pressure measurement. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach a high level of standardization for blood pressure measurements across countries and over time. A detailed, standardized measurement protocol, and adequate training and monitoring during the fieldwork and centrally organized quality assessment of the data are needed. The recent EU regulation banning the sale of mercury sphygmomanometer in European Union Member States has set new challenges for the standardization of measurement devices since the validity of oscillometric measurements is device-specific and performance of aneroid devices depends very much on calibration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4403933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44039332015-04-21 Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level Tolonen, Hanna Koponen, Päivikki Naska, Androniki Männistö, Satu Broda, Grazyna Palosaari, Tarja Kuulasmaa, Kari BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate blood pressure measurements are needed in clinical practice, intervention studies and health examination surveys. Blood pressure measurements are sensitive: their accuracy can be affected by measurement environment, behaviour of the subject, measurement procedures, devices used for the measurement and the observer. To minimize errors in blood pressure measurement, a standardized measurement protocol is needed. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey (EHES) Pilot project was conducted in 2009–2012. A pilot health examination survey was conducted in 12 countries using a standardized protocol. The measurement protocols used in each survey, training provided for the measurers, measurement data, and observations during site visits were collected and evaluated to assess the level of standardization. RESULTS: The EHES measurement protocol for blood pressure was followed accurately in all 12 pilot surveys. Most of the surveys succeeded in organizing a quiet and comfortable measurement environment, and staff instructed survey participants appropriately before examination visits. In all surveys, blood pressure was measured three times, from the right arm in a sitting posture. The biggest variation was in the device used for the blood pressure measurement. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reach a high level of standardization for blood pressure measurements across countries and over time. A detailed, standardized measurement protocol, and adequate training and monitoring during the fieldwork and centrally organized quality assessment of the data are needed. The recent EU regulation banning the sale of mercury sphygmomanometer in European Union Member States has set new challenges for the standardization of measurement devices since the validity of oscillometric measurements is device-specific and performance of aneroid devices depends very much on calibration. BioMed Central 2015-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4403933/ /pubmed/25880766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0020-3 Text en © Tolonen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tolonen, Hanna Koponen, Päivikki Naska, Androniki Männistö, Satu Broda, Grazyna Palosaari, Tarja Kuulasmaa, Kari Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
title | Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
title_full | Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
title_fullStr | Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
title_short | Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
title_sort | challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4403933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0020-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolonenhanna challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT koponenpaivikki challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT naskaandroniki challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT mannistosatu challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT brodagrazyna challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT palosaaritarja challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT kuulasmaakari challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel AT challengesinstandardizationofbloodpressuremeasurementatthepopulationlevel |