Cargando…
Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women, and early diagnosis is essential for future prognosis. Evidence from mainly cross-sectional US studies with self-reported exposure and outcome found positive association of body mass index (BMI) with non-participation in mammographic scree...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1296-8 |
_version_ | 1782367426649784320 |
---|---|
author | Hellmann, Sophie Sell Njor, Sisse Helle Lynge, Elsebeth von Euler-Chelpin, My Olsen, Anja Tjønneland, Anne Vejborg, Ilse Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic |
author_facet | Hellmann, Sophie Sell Njor, Sisse Helle Lynge, Elsebeth von Euler-Chelpin, My Olsen, Anja Tjønneland, Anne Vejborg, Ilse Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic |
author_sort | Hellmann, Sophie Sell |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women, and early diagnosis is essential for future prognosis. Evidence from mainly cross-sectional US studies with self-reported exposure and outcome found positive association of body mass index (BMI) with non-participation in mammographic screening, but hardly addressed the influence of potential effect-modifiers. We studied the association between objective measures of BMI and participation in mammographic screening in a Danish prospective cohort, and explored the influence of menopausal status, hormone therapy (HT), previous screening participation, and morbidities on this relationship. METHODS: A total of 5,134 women from the Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort who were invited to population based mammographic screening in Copenhagen were included in analysis. Women were 50–64 years old at inclusion (1993–97) when their height and weight were measured and covariates collected via questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between BMI and mammographic screening participation were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for other breast cancer risk factors and morbidities. Effect modification was evaluated by an interaction term and tested by Wald test. RESULTS: Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2), OR: 95% CI; 2.24: 1.27-3.96) and obese women of class II (BMI 35–40 kg/m(2), 1.54: 0.99-2.39) and III (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2), 1.81: 0.95-3.44) had significantly higher odds of non-participation than women with normal weight. This association was limited to postmenopausal women (Wald test p = 0.08), with enhanced non-participation in underweight (2.83: 1.52-5.27) and obese women of class II and III (1.84: 1.15-2.95; 2.47: 1.20-5.06) as compared to normal weight postmenopausal women. There was no effect modification by HT, previous screening participation, or morbidities, besides suggestive evidence of enhanced non-participation in diabetic overweight and obese women. CONCLUSIONS: Underweight and very obese postmenopausal women were significantly less likely to participate in mammographic screening than women with normal weight, while BMI was not related to screening in premenopausal women. Effect of BMI on mammographic screening participation was not significantly modified by HT, previous screening participation, or morbidities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4404005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44040052015-04-21 Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study Hellmann, Sophie Sell Njor, Sisse Helle Lynge, Elsebeth von Euler-Chelpin, My Olsen, Anja Tjønneland, Anne Vejborg, Ilse Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women, and early diagnosis is essential for future prognosis. Evidence from mainly cross-sectional US studies with self-reported exposure and outcome found positive association of body mass index (BMI) with non-participation in mammographic screening, but hardly addressed the influence of potential effect-modifiers. We studied the association between objective measures of BMI and participation in mammographic screening in a Danish prospective cohort, and explored the influence of menopausal status, hormone therapy (HT), previous screening participation, and morbidities on this relationship. METHODS: A total of 5,134 women from the Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort who were invited to population based mammographic screening in Copenhagen were included in analysis. Women were 50–64 years old at inclusion (1993–97) when their height and weight were measured and covariates collected via questionnaire. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between BMI and mammographic screening participation were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for other breast cancer risk factors and morbidities. Effect modification was evaluated by an interaction term and tested by Wald test. RESULTS: Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2), OR: 95% CI; 2.24: 1.27-3.96) and obese women of class II (BMI 35–40 kg/m(2), 1.54: 0.99-2.39) and III (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2), 1.81: 0.95-3.44) had significantly higher odds of non-participation than women with normal weight. This association was limited to postmenopausal women (Wald test p = 0.08), with enhanced non-participation in underweight (2.83: 1.52-5.27) and obese women of class II and III (1.84: 1.15-2.95; 2.47: 1.20-5.06) as compared to normal weight postmenopausal women. There was no effect modification by HT, previous screening participation, or morbidities, besides suggestive evidence of enhanced non-participation in diabetic overweight and obese women. CONCLUSIONS: Underweight and very obese postmenopausal women were significantly less likely to participate in mammographic screening than women with normal weight, while BMI was not related to screening in premenopausal women. Effect of BMI on mammographic screening participation was not significantly modified by HT, previous screening participation, or morbidities. BioMed Central 2015-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4404005/ /pubmed/25880028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1296-8 Text en © Hellmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hellmann, Sophie Sell Njor, Sisse Helle Lynge, Elsebeth von Euler-Chelpin, My Olsen, Anja Tjønneland, Anne Vejborg, Ilse Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
title | Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | body mass index and participation in organized mammographic screening: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1296-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellmannsophiesell bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT njorsissehelle bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT lyngeelsebeth bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT voneulerchelpinmy bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT olsenanja bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT tjønnelandanne bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT vejborgilse bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy AT andersenzoranajovanovic bodymassindexandparticipationinorganizedmammographicscreeningaprospectivecohortstudy |