Cargando…

Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells

BACKGROUND: Organisms that need to perform multiple tasks face a fundamental tradeoff: no design can be optimal at all tasks at once. Recent theory based on Pareto optimality showed that such tradeoffs lead to a highly defined range of phenotypes, which lie in low-dimensional polyhedra in the space...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tendler, Avichai, Mayo, Avraham, Alon, Uri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z
_version_ 1782367427577774080
author Tendler, Avichai
Mayo, Avraham
Alon, Uri
author_facet Tendler, Avichai
Mayo, Avraham
Alon, Uri
author_sort Tendler, Avichai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Organisms that need to perform multiple tasks face a fundamental tradeoff: no design can be optimal at all tasks at once. Recent theory based on Pareto optimality showed that such tradeoffs lead to a highly defined range of phenotypes, which lie in low-dimensional polyhedra in the space of traits. The vertices of these polyhedra are called archetypes- the phenotypes that are optimal at a single task. To rigorously test this theory requires measurements of thousands of species over hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Ammonoid fossil shells provide an excellent model system for this purpose. Ammonoids have a well-defined geometry that can be parameterized using three dimensionless features of their logarithmic-spiral-shaped shells. Their evolutionary history includes repeated mass extinctions. RESULTS: We find that ammonoids fill out a pyramid in morphospace, suggesting five specific tasks - one for each vertex of the pyramid. After mass extinctions, surviving species evolve to refill essentially the same pyramid, suggesting that the tasks are unchanging. We infer putative tasks for each archetype, related to economy of shell material, rapid shell growth, hydrodynamics and compactness. CONCLUSIONS: These results support Pareto optimality theory as an approach to study evolutionary tradeoffs, and demonstrate how this approach can be used to infer the putative tasks that may shape the natural selection of phenotypes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4404009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44040092015-04-21 Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells Tendler, Avichai Mayo, Avraham Alon, Uri BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Organisms that need to perform multiple tasks face a fundamental tradeoff: no design can be optimal at all tasks at once. Recent theory based on Pareto optimality showed that such tradeoffs lead to a highly defined range of phenotypes, which lie in low-dimensional polyhedra in the space of traits. The vertices of these polyhedra are called archetypes- the phenotypes that are optimal at a single task. To rigorously test this theory requires measurements of thousands of species over hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Ammonoid fossil shells provide an excellent model system for this purpose. Ammonoids have a well-defined geometry that can be parameterized using three dimensionless features of their logarithmic-spiral-shaped shells. Their evolutionary history includes repeated mass extinctions. RESULTS: We find that ammonoids fill out a pyramid in morphospace, suggesting five specific tasks - one for each vertex of the pyramid. After mass extinctions, surviving species evolve to refill essentially the same pyramid, suggesting that the tasks are unchanging. We infer putative tasks for each archetype, related to economy of shell material, rapid shell growth, hydrodynamics and compactness. CONCLUSIONS: These results support Pareto optimality theory as an approach to study evolutionary tradeoffs, and demonstrate how this approach can be used to infer the putative tasks that may shape the natural selection of phenotypes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4404009/ /pubmed/25884468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z Text en © Tendler et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tendler, Avichai
Mayo, Avraham
Alon, Uri
Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
title Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
title_full Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
title_fullStr Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
title_short Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
title_sort evolutionary tradeoffs, pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tendleravichai evolutionarytradeoffsparetooptimalityandthemorphologyofammoniteshells
AT mayoavraham evolutionarytradeoffsparetooptimalityandthemorphologyofammoniteshells
AT alonuri evolutionarytradeoffsparetooptimalityandthemorphologyofammoniteshells