Cargando…

Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation

BACKGROUND: Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Genetic effects are often modeled as additively acting marker allele effects. However, the actual mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishio, Motohide, Satoh, Masahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0091-y
_version_ 1782367436830408704
author Nishio, Motohide
Satoh, Masahiro
author_facet Nishio, Motohide
Satoh, Masahiro
author_sort Nishio, Motohide
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Genetic effects are often modeled as additively acting marker allele effects. However, the actual mode of biological action can differ from this assumption. Many livestock traits exhibit genomic imprinting, which may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits. Here, we present two statistical models of GBLUP including imprinting effects (GBLUP-I) on the basis of genotypic values (GBLUP-I1) and gametic values (GBLUP-I2). The performance of these models for the estimation of variance components and prediction of genetic values across a range of genetic variations was evaluated in simulations. RESULTS: Estimates of total genetic variances and residual variances with GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were close to the true values and the regression coefficients of total genetic values on their estimates were close to 1. Accuracies of estimated total genetic values in both GBLUP-I methods increased with increasing degree of imprinting and broad-sense heritability. When the imprinting variances were equal to 1.4% to 6.0% of the phenotypic variances, the accuracies of estimated total genetic values with GBLUP-I1 exceeded those with GBLUP by 1.4% to 7.8%. In comparison with GBLUP-I1, the superiority of GBLUP-I2 over GBLUP depended strongly on degree of imprinting and difference in genetic values between paternal and maternal alleles. When paternal and maternal alleles were predicted (phasing accuracy was equal to 0.979), accuracies of the estimated total genetic values in GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were 1.7% and 1.2% lower than when paternal and maternal alleles were known. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study shows that GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 can accurately estimate total genetic variance and perform well for the prediction of total genetic values. GBLUP-I1 is preferred for genomic evaluation, while GBLUP-I2 is preferred when the imprinting effects are large, and the genetic effects differ substantially between sexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4404063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44040632015-04-21 Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation Nishio, Motohide Satoh, Masahiro Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Genetic effects are often modeled as additively acting marker allele effects. However, the actual mode of biological action can differ from this assumption. Many livestock traits exhibit genomic imprinting, which may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits. Here, we present two statistical models of GBLUP including imprinting effects (GBLUP-I) on the basis of genotypic values (GBLUP-I1) and gametic values (GBLUP-I2). The performance of these models for the estimation of variance components and prediction of genetic values across a range of genetic variations was evaluated in simulations. RESULTS: Estimates of total genetic variances and residual variances with GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were close to the true values and the regression coefficients of total genetic values on their estimates were close to 1. Accuracies of estimated total genetic values in both GBLUP-I methods increased with increasing degree of imprinting and broad-sense heritability. When the imprinting variances were equal to 1.4% to 6.0% of the phenotypic variances, the accuracies of estimated total genetic values with GBLUP-I1 exceeded those with GBLUP by 1.4% to 7.8%. In comparison with GBLUP-I1, the superiority of GBLUP-I2 over GBLUP depended strongly on degree of imprinting and difference in genetic values between paternal and maternal alleles. When paternal and maternal alleles were predicted (phasing accuracy was equal to 0.979), accuracies of the estimated total genetic values in GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were 1.7% and 1.2% lower than when paternal and maternal alleles were known. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation study shows that GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 can accurately estimate total genetic variance and perform well for the prediction of total genetic values. GBLUP-I1 is preferred for genomic evaluation, while GBLUP-I2 is preferred when the imprinting effects are large, and the genetic effects differ substantially between sexes. BioMed Central 2015-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4404063/ /pubmed/25928098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0091-y Text en © Nishio and Satoh; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nishio, Motohide
Satoh, Masahiro
Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
title Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
title_full Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
title_fullStr Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
title_short Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
title_sort genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0091-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nishiomotohide genomicbestlinearunbiasedpredictionmethodincludingimprintingeffectsforgenomicevaluation
AT satohmasahiro genomicbestlinearunbiasedpredictionmethodincludingimprintingeffectsforgenomicevaluation