Cargando…

Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND: Personalised medicine and targeted therapy have revolutionised cancer treatment. However, most patients develop drug resistance and relapse after showing an initial treatment response. Two theories have been postulated; either secondary resistance mutations develop de novo during therapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heydt, Carina, Kumm, Niklas, Fassunke, Jana, Künstlinger, Helen, Ihle, Michaela Angelika, Scheel, Andreas, Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich, Haller, Florian, Büttner, Reinhard, Odenthal, Margarete, Wardelmann, Eva, Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1311-0
_version_ 1782367446627254272
author Heydt, Carina
Kumm, Niklas
Fassunke, Jana
Künstlinger, Helen
Ihle, Michaela Angelika
Scheel, Andreas
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Haller, Florian
Büttner, Reinhard
Odenthal, Margarete
Wardelmann, Eva
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
author_facet Heydt, Carina
Kumm, Niklas
Fassunke, Jana
Künstlinger, Helen
Ihle, Michaela Angelika
Scheel, Andreas
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Haller, Florian
Büttner, Reinhard
Odenthal, Margarete
Wardelmann, Eva
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
author_sort Heydt, Carina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personalised medicine and targeted therapy have revolutionised cancer treatment. However, most patients develop drug resistance and relapse after showing an initial treatment response. Two theories have been postulated; either secondary resistance mutations develop de novo during therapy by mutagenesis or they are present in minor subclones prior to therapy. In this study, these two theories were evaluated in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) where most patients develop secondary resistance mutations in the KIT gene during therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: We used a cohort of 33 formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary GISTs and their corresponding recurrent tumours with known mutational status. The primary tumours were analysed for the secondary mutations of the recurrences, which had been identified previously. The primary tumours were resected prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Three ultrasensitive, massively parallel sequencing approaches on the GS Junior (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and the MiSeq(TM) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were applied. Additionally, nine fresh-frozen samples resected prior to therapy were analysed for the most common secondary resistance mutations. RESULTS: With a sensitivity level of down to 0.02%, no pre-existing resistant subclones with secondary KIT mutations were detected in primary GISTs. The sensitivity level varied for individual secondary mutations and was limited by sequencing artefacts on both systems. Artificial T > C substitutions at the position of the exon 13 p.V654A mutation, in particular, led to a lower sensitivity, independent from the source of the material. Fresh-frozen samples showed the same range of artificially mutated allele frequencies as the FFPE material. CONCLUSIONS: Although we achieved a sufficiently high level of sensitivity, neither in the primary FFPE nor in the fresh-frozen GISTs we were able to detect pre-existing resistant subclones of the corresponding known secondary resistance mutations of the recurrent tumours. This supports the theory that secondary KIT resistance mutations develop under treatment by “de novo” mutagenesis. Alternatively, the detection limit of two mutated clones in 10,000 wild-type clones might not have been high enough or heterogeneous tissue samples, per se, might not be suitable for the detection of very small subpopulations of mutated cells. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1311-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4404105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44041052015-04-21 Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy Heydt, Carina Kumm, Niklas Fassunke, Jana Künstlinger, Helen Ihle, Michaela Angelika Scheel, Andreas Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich Haller, Florian Büttner, Reinhard Odenthal, Margarete Wardelmann, Eva Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Personalised medicine and targeted therapy have revolutionised cancer treatment. However, most patients develop drug resistance and relapse after showing an initial treatment response. Two theories have been postulated; either secondary resistance mutations develop de novo during therapy by mutagenesis or they are present in minor subclones prior to therapy. In this study, these two theories were evaluated in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) where most patients develop secondary resistance mutations in the KIT gene during therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: We used a cohort of 33 formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary GISTs and their corresponding recurrent tumours with known mutational status. The primary tumours were analysed for the secondary mutations of the recurrences, which had been identified previously. The primary tumours were resected prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Three ultrasensitive, massively parallel sequencing approaches on the GS Junior (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and the MiSeq(TM) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were applied. Additionally, nine fresh-frozen samples resected prior to therapy were analysed for the most common secondary resistance mutations. RESULTS: With a sensitivity level of down to 0.02%, no pre-existing resistant subclones with secondary KIT mutations were detected in primary GISTs. The sensitivity level varied for individual secondary mutations and was limited by sequencing artefacts on both systems. Artificial T > C substitutions at the position of the exon 13 p.V654A mutation, in particular, led to a lower sensitivity, independent from the source of the material. Fresh-frozen samples showed the same range of artificially mutated allele frequencies as the FFPE material. CONCLUSIONS: Although we achieved a sufficiently high level of sensitivity, neither in the primary FFPE nor in the fresh-frozen GISTs we were able to detect pre-existing resistant subclones of the corresponding known secondary resistance mutations of the recurrent tumours. This supports the theory that secondary KIT resistance mutations develop under treatment by “de novo” mutagenesis. Alternatively, the detection limit of two mutated clones in 10,000 wild-type clones might not have been high enough or heterogeneous tissue samples, per se, might not be suitable for the detection of very small subpopulations of mutated cells. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1311-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4404105/ /pubmed/25886408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1311-0 Text en © Heydt et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heydt, Carina
Kumm, Niklas
Fassunke, Jana
Künstlinger, Helen
Ihle, Michaela Angelika
Scheel, Andreas
Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
Haller, Florian
Büttner, Reinhard
Odenthal, Margarete
Wardelmann, Eva
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
title Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
title_full Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
title_fullStr Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
title_full_unstemmed Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
title_short Massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
title_sort massively parallel sequencing fails to detect minor resistant subclones in tissue samples prior to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1311-0
work_keys_str_mv AT heydtcarina massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT kummniklas massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT fassunkejana massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT kunstlingerhelen massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT ihlemichaelaangelika massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT scheelandreas massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT schildhaushansulrich massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT hallerflorian massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT buttnerreinhard massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT odenthalmargarete massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT wardelmanneva massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy
AT merkelbachbrusesabine massivelyparallelsequencingfailstodetectminorresistantsubclonesintissuesamplespriortotyrosinekinaseinhibitortherapy