Cargando…

Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T

BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC CMR) has emerged as a clinical tool for blood flow quantification but its use in the foetus has been hampered by the need for gating with the foetal heart beat. The previously described metric optimized gating (MOG) technique has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai-Goodman, Beverly, Zhu, Meng Yuan, Al-Rujaib, Mashael, Seed, Mike, Macgowan, Christopher K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2
_version_ 1782367460541857792
author Tsai-Goodman, Beverly
Zhu, Meng Yuan
Al-Rujaib, Mashael
Seed, Mike
Macgowan, Christopher K
author_facet Tsai-Goodman, Beverly
Zhu, Meng Yuan
Al-Rujaib, Mashael
Seed, Mike
Macgowan, Christopher K
author_sort Tsai-Goodman, Beverly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC CMR) has emerged as a clinical tool for blood flow quantification but its use in the foetus has been hampered by the need for gating with the foetal heart beat. The previously described metric optimized gating (MOG) technique has been successfully used to measure foetal blood flow in late gestation foetuses on a 1.5 T CMR magnet. However, there is increasing interest in performing foetal cardiac imaging using 3.0 T CMR. We describe our pilot investigation of foetal blood flow measured using 3.0 T CMR. METHODS: Foetal blood flows were quantified in 5 subjects at late gestational age (35–38 weeks). Three were normal pregnancies and two were pregnancies with ventricular size discrepancy. Data were obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using a previously described PC CMR protocol. After reconstruction using MOG, blood flow was quantified independently by two observers. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of flow measurements at the two field strengths was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)), linear regression and Bland Altman analysis. RESULTS: PC CMR flow measurements were obtained in 36 of 40 target vessels. Strong intra-observer agreement was obtained between measurements at each field strength (R(2) = 0.78, slope = 0.83 ± 0.11), with a mean bias of −1 ml/min/kg and 95% confidence limits of ±71 ml/min/kg. Inter-observer agreement was similarly high for measurements at both 1.5 T (R(2) = 0.86, slope = 0.95 ± 0.13, bias = 6 ± 52 ml/min/kg) and 3.0 T (R(2) = 0.88, slope = 0.94 ± 0.13, bias = 4 ± 47 ml/min/kg). Across all PC CMR measurements, SNR per pixel was expectedly higher at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T (165 ± 50%). The relative differences in flow measurements between observers were low (range: 4–16%) except for pulmonary blood flow which showed much higher variability at 1.5 T (34%) versus that at 3.0 T (11%). This was attributed to the poorly visualized, small pulmonary vessels at 1.5 T, which made delineation inconsistent between observers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pilot study to measure foetal blood flow using PC CMR at 3.0 T. The flow data obtained were in good correlation with those measured at 1.5 T, both within and between observers. With increased SNR at 3.0 T, smaller pulmonary vessels were better visualized which improved inter-observer agreement of associated flows. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4404231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44042312015-04-29 Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T Tsai-Goodman, Beverly Zhu, Meng Yuan Al-Rujaib, Mashael Seed, Mike Macgowan, Christopher K J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Technical Notes BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC CMR) has emerged as a clinical tool for blood flow quantification but its use in the foetus has been hampered by the need for gating with the foetal heart beat. The previously described metric optimized gating (MOG) technique has been successfully used to measure foetal blood flow in late gestation foetuses on a 1.5 T CMR magnet. However, there is increasing interest in performing foetal cardiac imaging using 3.0 T CMR. We describe our pilot investigation of foetal blood flow measured using 3.0 T CMR. METHODS: Foetal blood flows were quantified in 5 subjects at late gestational age (35–38 weeks). Three were normal pregnancies and two were pregnancies with ventricular size discrepancy. Data were obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using a previously described PC CMR protocol. After reconstruction using MOG, blood flow was quantified independently by two observers. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of flow measurements at the two field strengths was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)), linear regression and Bland Altman analysis. RESULTS: PC CMR flow measurements were obtained in 36 of 40 target vessels. Strong intra-observer agreement was obtained between measurements at each field strength (R(2) = 0.78, slope = 0.83 ± 0.11), with a mean bias of −1 ml/min/kg and 95% confidence limits of ±71 ml/min/kg. Inter-observer agreement was similarly high for measurements at both 1.5 T (R(2) = 0.86, slope = 0.95 ± 0.13, bias = 6 ± 52 ml/min/kg) and 3.0 T (R(2) = 0.88, slope = 0.94 ± 0.13, bias = 4 ± 47 ml/min/kg). Across all PC CMR measurements, SNR per pixel was expectedly higher at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T (165 ± 50%). The relative differences in flow measurements between observers were low (range: 4–16%) except for pulmonary blood flow which showed much higher variability at 1.5 T (34%) versus that at 3.0 T (11%). This was attributed to the poorly visualized, small pulmonary vessels at 1.5 T, which made delineation inconsistent between observers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pilot study to measure foetal blood flow using PC CMR at 3.0 T. The flow data obtained were in good correlation with those measured at 1.5 T, both within and between observers. With increased SNR at 3.0 T, smaller pulmonary vessels were better visualized which improved inter-observer agreement of associated flows. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4404231/ /pubmed/25928450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2 Text en © Tsai-Goodman et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Tsai-Goodman, Beverly
Zhu, Meng Yuan
Al-Rujaib, Mashael
Seed, Mike
Macgowan, Christopher K
Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
title Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
title_full Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
title_fullStr Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
title_full_unstemmed Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
title_short Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
title_sort foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 t with 3.0 t
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaigoodmanbeverly foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t
AT zhumengyuan foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t
AT alrujaibmashael foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t
AT seedmike foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t
AT macgowanchristopherk foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t