Cargando…
Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC CMR) has emerged as a clinical tool for blood flow quantification but its use in the foetus has been hampered by the need for gating with the foetal heart beat. The previously described metric optimized gating (MOG) technique has been...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2 |
_version_ | 1782367460541857792 |
---|---|
author | Tsai-Goodman, Beverly Zhu, Meng Yuan Al-Rujaib, Mashael Seed, Mike Macgowan, Christopher K |
author_facet | Tsai-Goodman, Beverly Zhu, Meng Yuan Al-Rujaib, Mashael Seed, Mike Macgowan, Christopher K |
author_sort | Tsai-Goodman, Beverly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC CMR) has emerged as a clinical tool for blood flow quantification but its use in the foetus has been hampered by the need for gating with the foetal heart beat. The previously described metric optimized gating (MOG) technique has been successfully used to measure foetal blood flow in late gestation foetuses on a 1.5 T CMR magnet. However, there is increasing interest in performing foetal cardiac imaging using 3.0 T CMR. We describe our pilot investigation of foetal blood flow measured using 3.0 T CMR. METHODS: Foetal blood flows were quantified in 5 subjects at late gestational age (35–38 weeks). Three were normal pregnancies and two were pregnancies with ventricular size discrepancy. Data were obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using a previously described PC CMR protocol. After reconstruction using MOG, blood flow was quantified independently by two observers. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of flow measurements at the two field strengths was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)), linear regression and Bland Altman analysis. RESULTS: PC CMR flow measurements were obtained in 36 of 40 target vessels. Strong intra-observer agreement was obtained between measurements at each field strength (R(2) = 0.78, slope = 0.83 ± 0.11), with a mean bias of −1 ml/min/kg and 95% confidence limits of ±71 ml/min/kg. Inter-observer agreement was similarly high for measurements at both 1.5 T (R(2) = 0.86, slope = 0.95 ± 0.13, bias = 6 ± 52 ml/min/kg) and 3.0 T (R(2) = 0.88, slope = 0.94 ± 0.13, bias = 4 ± 47 ml/min/kg). Across all PC CMR measurements, SNR per pixel was expectedly higher at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T (165 ± 50%). The relative differences in flow measurements between observers were low (range: 4–16%) except for pulmonary blood flow which showed much higher variability at 1.5 T (34%) versus that at 3.0 T (11%). This was attributed to the poorly visualized, small pulmonary vessels at 1.5 T, which made delineation inconsistent between observers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pilot study to measure foetal blood flow using PC CMR at 3.0 T. The flow data obtained were in good correlation with those measured at 1.5 T, both within and between observers. With increased SNR at 3.0 T, smaller pulmonary vessels were better visualized which improved inter-observer agreement of associated flows. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4404231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44042312015-04-29 Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T Tsai-Goodman, Beverly Zhu, Meng Yuan Al-Rujaib, Mashael Seed, Mike Macgowan, Christopher K J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Technical Notes BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC CMR) has emerged as a clinical tool for blood flow quantification but its use in the foetus has been hampered by the need for gating with the foetal heart beat. The previously described metric optimized gating (MOG) technique has been successfully used to measure foetal blood flow in late gestation foetuses on a 1.5 T CMR magnet. However, there is increasing interest in performing foetal cardiac imaging using 3.0 T CMR. We describe our pilot investigation of foetal blood flow measured using 3.0 T CMR. METHODS: Foetal blood flows were quantified in 5 subjects at late gestational age (35–38 weeks). Three were normal pregnancies and two were pregnancies with ventricular size discrepancy. Data were obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using a previously described PC CMR protocol. After reconstruction using MOG, blood flow was quantified independently by two observers. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of flow measurements at the two field strengths was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)), linear regression and Bland Altman analysis. RESULTS: PC CMR flow measurements were obtained in 36 of 40 target vessels. Strong intra-observer agreement was obtained between measurements at each field strength (R(2) = 0.78, slope = 0.83 ± 0.11), with a mean bias of −1 ml/min/kg and 95% confidence limits of ±71 ml/min/kg. Inter-observer agreement was similarly high for measurements at both 1.5 T (R(2) = 0.86, slope = 0.95 ± 0.13, bias = 6 ± 52 ml/min/kg) and 3.0 T (R(2) = 0.88, slope = 0.94 ± 0.13, bias = 4 ± 47 ml/min/kg). Across all PC CMR measurements, SNR per pixel was expectedly higher at 3.0 T relative to 1.5 T (165 ± 50%). The relative differences in flow measurements between observers were low (range: 4–16%) except for pulmonary blood flow which showed much higher variability at 1.5 T (34%) versus that at 3.0 T (11%). This was attributed to the poorly visualized, small pulmonary vessels at 1.5 T, which made delineation inconsistent between observers. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pilot study to measure foetal blood flow using PC CMR at 3.0 T. The flow data obtained were in good correlation with those measured at 1.5 T, both within and between observers. With increased SNR at 3.0 T, smaller pulmonary vessels were better visualized which improved inter-observer agreement of associated flows. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4404231/ /pubmed/25928450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2 Text en © Tsai-Goodman et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Tsai-Goodman, Beverly Zhu, Meng Yuan Al-Rujaib, Mashael Seed, Mike Macgowan, Christopher K Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T |
title | Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T |
title_full | Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T |
title_fullStr | Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T |
title_full_unstemmed | Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T |
title_short | Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T |
title_sort | foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 t with 3.0 t |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0132-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaigoodmanbeverly foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t AT zhumengyuan foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t AT alrujaibmashael foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t AT seedmike foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t AT macgowanchristopherk foetalbloodflowmeasuredusingphasecontrastcardiovascularmagneticresonancepreliminarydatacomparing15twith30t |