Cargando…
Effects of question formats on causal judgments and model evaluation
Evaluation of causal reasoning models depends on how well the subjects’ causal beliefs are assessed. Elicitation of causal beliefs is determined by the experimental questions put to subjects. We examined the impact of question formats commonly used in causal reasoning research on participant’s respo...
Autores principales: | Shou, Yiyun, Smithson, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25954225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00467 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Randomly stopped sums: models and psychological applications
por: Smithson, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Probability judgments under ambiguity and conflict
por: Smithson, Michael
Publicado: (2015) -
Asymmetries in Responses to Attitude Statements: The Example of “Zero-Sum” Beliefs
por: Smithson, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Adapting to an Uncertain World: Cognitive Capacity and Causal Reasoning with Ambiguous Observations
por: Shou, Yiyun, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Moral asymmetries in judgments of agency withstand ludicrous causal deviance
por: Sousa, Paulo, et al.
Publicado: (2015)