Cargando…

Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Metamizole is used to treat pain in many parts of the world. Information on the safety profile of metamizole is scarce; no conclusive summary of the literature exists. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether metamizole is clinically safe compared to placebo and other analgesics. METHODS: We sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kötter, Thomas, da Costa, Bruno R., Fässler, Margrit, Blozik, Eva, Linde, Klaus, Jüni, Peter, Reichenbach, Stephan, Scherer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4405027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122918
_version_ 1782367588603396096
author Kötter, Thomas
da Costa, Bruno R.
Fässler, Margrit
Blozik, Eva
Linde, Klaus
Jüni, Peter
Reichenbach, Stephan
Scherer, Martin
author_facet Kötter, Thomas
da Costa, Bruno R.
Fässler, Margrit
Blozik, Eva
Linde, Klaus
Jüni, Peter
Reichenbach, Stephan
Scherer, Martin
author_sort Kötter, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metamizole is used to treat pain in many parts of the world. Information on the safety profile of metamizole is scarce; no conclusive summary of the literature exists. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether metamizole is clinically safe compared to placebo and other analgesics. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and several clinical trial registries. We screened the reference lists of included trials and previous systematic reviews. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of metamizole, administered to adults in any form and for any indication, to other analgesics or to placebo. Two authors extracted data regarding trial design and size, indications for pain medication, patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and methodological characteristics. Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and dropouts were assessed. We conducted separate meta-analyses for each metamizole comparator, using standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis to pool the estimates across trials, reported as risk ratios (RRs). We calculated the DerSimonian and Laird variance estimate T(2) to measure heterogeneity between trials. The pre-specified primary end point was any AE during the trial period. RESULTS: Of the 696 potentially eligible trials, 79 trials including almost 4000 patients with short-term metamizole use of less than two weeks met our inclusion criteria. Fewer AEs were reported for metamizole compared to opioids, RR = 0.79 (confidence interval 0.79 to 0.96). We found no differences between metamizole and placebo, paracetamol and NSAIDs. Only a few SAEs were reported, with no difference between metamizole and other analgesics. No agranulocytosis or deaths were reported. Our results were limited by the mediocre overall quality of the reports. CONCLUSION: For short-term use in the hospital setting, metamizole seems to be a safe choice when compared to other widely used analgesics. High-quality, adequately sized trials assessing the intermediate- and long-term safety of metamizole are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4405027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44050272015-05-02 Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Kötter, Thomas da Costa, Bruno R. Fässler, Margrit Blozik, Eva Linde, Klaus Jüni, Peter Reichenbach, Stephan Scherer, Martin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Metamizole is used to treat pain in many parts of the world. Information on the safety profile of metamizole is scarce; no conclusive summary of the literature exists. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether metamizole is clinically safe compared to placebo and other analgesics. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and several clinical trial registries. We screened the reference lists of included trials and previous systematic reviews. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of metamizole, administered to adults in any form and for any indication, to other analgesics or to placebo. Two authors extracted data regarding trial design and size, indications for pain medication, patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and methodological characteristics. Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and dropouts were assessed. We conducted separate meta-analyses for each metamizole comparator, using standard inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis to pool the estimates across trials, reported as risk ratios (RRs). We calculated the DerSimonian and Laird variance estimate T(2) to measure heterogeneity between trials. The pre-specified primary end point was any AE during the trial period. RESULTS: Of the 696 potentially eligible trials, 79 trials including almost 4000 patients with short-term metamizole use of less than two weeks met our inclusion criteria. Fewer AEs were reported for metamizole compared to opioids, RR = 0.79 (confidence interval 0.79 to 0.96). We found no differences between metamizole and placebo, paracetamol and NSAIDs. Only a few SAEs were reported, with no difference between metamizole and other analgesics. No agranulocytosis or deaths were reported. Our results were limited by the mediocre overall quality of the reports. CONCLUSION: For short-term use in the hospital setting, metamizole seems to be a safe choice when compared to other widely used analgesics. High-quality, adequately sized trials assessing the intermediate- and long-term safety of metamizole are needed. Public Library of Science 2015-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4405027/ /pubmed/25875821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122918 Text en © 2015 Kötter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kötter, Thomas
da Costa, Bruno R.
Fässler, Margrit
Blozik, Eva
Linde, Klaus
Jüni, Peter
Reichenbach, Stephan
Scherer, Martin
Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4405027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25875821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122918
work_keys_str_mv AT kotterthomas metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dacostabrunor metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fasslermargrit metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blozikeva metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lindeklaus metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT junipeter metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reichenbachstephan metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scherermartin metamizoleassociatedadverseeventsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis