Cargando…

Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Cryotherapy is the most common non-pharmacological pain-relieving method. The aim of this pilot study was to ascertain whether intranasal evaporative cooling may be an effective intervention in an acute migraine attack. Studies have previously demonstrated effectiveness of a variety of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanderpol, Jitka, Bishop, Barbara, Matharu, Manjit, Glencorse, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4405521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-5
_version_ 1782367643740667904
author Vanderpol, Jitka
Bishop, Barbara
Matharu, Manjit
Glencorse, Mark
author_facet Vanderpol, Jitka
Bishop, Barbara
Matharu, Manjit
Glencorse, Mark
author_sort Vanderpol, Jitka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cryotherapy is the most common non-pharmacological pain-relieving method. The aim of this pilot study was to ascertain whether intranasal evaporative cooling may be an effective intervention in an acute migraine attack. Studies have previously demonstrated effectiveness of a variety of cryotherapy approaches. Intranasal evaporative cooling due to vascular anatomy, allows the transfer of venous blood from nasal and paranasal mucous membranes to the dura mater, thereby providing an excellent anatomical basis for the cooling processes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, observational, pilot study. Twenty-eight patients who satisfied the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD 2) diagnostic criteria for migraine were recruited. A total of 20 treatments were administered in 15 patients. All patients provided pain severity scores and migraine-associated symptoms severity scores (based on a 0–10 visual analogue scale, [VAS]). RESULTS: Out of the 20 treatments, intranasal evaporative cooling rendered patients’ pain and symptoms free immediately after treatment, in 8 of the treatments (40%), a further 10 treatments (50%) resulted in partial pain relief (headache reduced from severe or moderate to mild) and partial symptoms relief. At 2 hours, 9 treatments (45%) provided full pain and symptoms relief, with a further 9 treatments (45%) resulting in partial pain and symptoms relief. At 24 hours, 10 treatments (50%) resulted in patients reporting pain and symptom freedom and 3 (15%) provided partial pain relief. In summary 13 patients (87%) had benefit from the treatment within 2 hours that was sustained at 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal evaporative cooling gave considerable benefit to patients with migraine, improving headache severity and migraine-associated symptoms. A further randomised, placebo controlled, double blinded, parallel clinical trial is required to further investigate the potential of this application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registered trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898455.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4405521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44055212015-04-27 Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study Vanderpol, Jitka Bishop, Barbara Matharu, Manjit Glencorse, Mark J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Cryotherapy is the most common non-pharmacological pain-relieving method. The aim of this pilot study was to ascertain whether intranasal evaporative cooling may be an effective intervention in an acute migraine attack. Studies have previously demonstrated effectiveness of a variety of cryotherapy approaches. Intranasal evaporative cooling due to vascular anatomy, allows the transfer of venous blood from nasal and paranasal mucous membranes to the dura mater, thereby providing an excellent anatomical basis for the cooling processes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, observational, pilot study. Twenty-eight patients who satisfied the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD 2) diagnostic criteria for migraine were recruited. A total of 20 treatments were administered in 15 patients. All patients provided pain severity scores and migraine-associated symptoms severity scores (based on a 0–10 visual analogue scale, [VAS]). RESULTS: Out of the 20 treatments, intranasal evaporative cooling rendered patients’ pain and symptoms free immediately after treatment, in 8 of the treatments (40%), a further 10 treatments (50%) resulted in partial pain relief (headache reduced from severe or moderate to mild) and partial symptoms relief. At 2 hours, 9 treatments (45%) provided full pain and symptoms relief, with a further 9 treatments (45%) resulting in partial pain and symptoms relief. At 24 hours, 10 treatments (50%) resulted in patients reporting pain and symptom freedom and 3 (15%) provided partial pain relief. In summary 13 patients (87%) had benefit from the treatment within 2 hours that was sustained at 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal evaporative cooling gave considerable benefit to patients with migraine, improving headache severity and migraine-associated symptoms. A further randomised, placebo controlled, double blinded, parallel clinical trial is required to further investigate the potential of this application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registered trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898455. Springer Milan 2015-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4405521/ /pubmed/25623151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-5 Text en © Vanderpol et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vanderpol, Jitka
Bishop, Barbara
Matharu, Manjit
Glencorse, Mark
Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
title Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
title_full Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
title_fullStr Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
title_short Therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
title_sort therapeutic effect of intranasal evaporative cooling in patients with migraine: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4405521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25623151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderpoljitka therapeuticeffectofintranasalevaporativecoolinginpatientswithmigraineapilotstudy
AT bishopbarbara therapeuticeffectofintranasalevaporativecoolinginpatientswithmigraineapilotstudy
AT matharumanjit therapeuticeffectofintranasalevaporativecoolinginpatientswithmigraineapilotstudy
AT glencorsemark therapeuticeffectofintranasalevaporativecoolinginpatientswithmigraineapilotstudy