Cargando…

Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has represented a technical milestone that has facilitated the clinical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of maximum primary tumor diameter (MPTD) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yong, Hu, Xue-Feng, Wang, Yan, Chen, Hai-Yang, Yang, Lin, Liu, Li-Zhi, Cui, Chun-Yan, Liu, Dong-Sheng, Liang, Shao-Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1288-8
_version_ 1782367710367186944
author Chen, Yong
Hu, Xue-Feng
Wang, Yan
Chen, Hai-Yang
Yang, Lin
Liu, Li-Zhi
Cui, Chun-Yan
Liu, Dong-Sheng
Liang, Shao-Bo
author_facet Chen, Yong
Hu, Xue-Feng
Wang, Yan
Chen, Hai-Yang
Yang, Lin
Liu, Li-Zhi
Cui, Chun-Yan
Liu, Dong-Sheng
Liang, Shao-Bo
author_sort Chen, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has represented a technical milestone that has facilitated the clinical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of maximum primary tumor diameter (MPTD) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated using IMRT. METHODS: Five-hundred and sixty-six patients with non-metastatic, histologically-confirmed NPC were retrospectively reviewed. MPTD was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were treated using IMRT; 87.5% (456/521) of patients with Stage T3-T4/N1-N3 disease also received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the optimal MPTD cut-off point and examine the prognostic value of combining MPTD with the current T classification criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up for all patients was 36 months (range, 1–52 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates for patients with a MPTD ≤41 vs. >41 mm were 96.1% vs. 85.4%, 93.7% vs. 74.7%, 96.1% vs. 79.7%, and 98.1% vs. 92.9%, respectively (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, MPTD was an independent prognostic factor for OS, FFS, DMFS and LRFS in all patients (all P < 0.05). Among stage T3-T4 patients, the 3-year OS, FFS, DMFS, and LRFS rates for patients with a MPTD ≤41 vs. >41 mm were 96.9% vs. 84.5%, 95.4% vs. 73.5%, 96.1% vs. 79.2%, and 99.3% vs. 92.6%, respectively (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, MPTD was also an independent prognostic factor for OS, FFS and DMFS in stage T3-T4 patients (all P < 0.05), and the difference in LRFS was almost statistically significant (P = 0.05). ROC curves verified that inclusion of MPTD improved the predictive value of the current T classification criteria (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MPTD was an independent prognostic factor in patients with NPC treated using IMRT, and significantly improved the prognostic value of the current T classification criteria for NPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4406035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44060352015-04-23 Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy? Chen, Yong Hu, Xue-Feng Wang, Yan Chen, Hai-Yang Yang, Lin Liu, Li-Zhi Cui, Chun-Yan Liu, Dong-Sheng Liang, Shao-Bo BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has represented a technical milestone that has facilitated the clinical implementation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of maximum primary tumor diameter (MPTD) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated using IMRT. METHODS: Five-hundred and sixty-six patients with non-metastatic, histologically-confirmed NPC were retrospectively reviewed. MPTD was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were treated using IMRT; 87.5% (456/521) of patients with Stage T3-T4/N1-N3 disease also received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the optimal MPTD cut-off point and examine the prognostic value of combining MPTD with the current T classification criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up for all patients was 36 months (range, 1–52 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates for patients with a MPTD ≤41 vs. >41 mm were 96.1% vs. 85.4%, 93.7% vs. 74.7%, 96.1% vs. 79.7%, and 98.1% vs. 92.9%, respectively (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, MPTD was an independent prognostic factor for OS, FFS, DMFS and LRFS in all patients (all P < 0.05). Among stage T3-T4 patients, the 3-year OS, FFS, DMFS, and LRFS rates for patients with a MPTD ≤41 vs. >41 mm were 96.9% vs. 84.5%, 95.4% vs. 73.5%, 96.1% vs. 79.2%, and 99.3% vs. 92.6%, respectively (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, MPTD was also an independent prognostic factor for OS, FFS and DMFS in stage T3-T4 patients (all P < 0.05), and the difference in LRFS was almost statistically significant (P = 0.05). ROC curves verified that inclusion of MPTD improved the predictive value of the current T classification criteria (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MPTD was an independent prognostic factor in patients with NPC treated using IMRT, and significantly improved the prognostic value of the current T classification criteria for NPC. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4406035/ /pubmed/25903652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1288-8 Text en © Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Yong
Hu, Xue-Feng
Wang, Yan
Chen, Hai-Yang
Yang, Lin
Liu, Li-Zhi
Cui, Chun-Yan
Liu, Dong-Sheng
Liang, Shao-Bo
Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
title Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
title_full Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
title_fullStr Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
title_short Is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
title_sort is maximum primary tumor diameter still a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25903652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1288-8
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyong ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT huxuefeng ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT wangyan ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT chenhaiyang ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT yanglin ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT liulizhi ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT cuichunyan ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT liudongsheng ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT liangshaobo ismaximumprimarytumordiameterstillaprognosticfactorinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomatreatedusingintensitymodulatedradiotherapy