Cargando…
Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action
We assessed the factors which affect the selection of objects for action, focusing on the role of action knowledge and its modulation by distracters. Fourteen neuropsychological patients and 10 healthy aged-matched controls selected pairs of objects commonly used together among distracters in two co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25954177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00199 |
_version_ | 1782367720140963840 |
---|---|
author | Wulff, Melanie Laverick, Rosanna Humphreys, Glyn W. Wing, Alan M. Rotshtein, Pia |
author_facet | Wulff, Melanie Laverick, Rosanna Humphreys, Glyn W. Wing, Alan M. Rotshtein, Pia |
author_sort | Wulff, Melanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | We assessed the factors which affect the selection of objects for action, focusing on the role of action knowledge and its modulation by distracters. Fourteen neuropsychological patients and 10 healthy aged-matched controls selected pairs of objects commonly used together among distracters in two contexts: with real objects and with pictures of the same objects presented sequentially on a computer screen. Across both tasks, semantically related distracters led to slower responses and more errors than unrelated distracters and the object actively used for action was selected prior to the object that would be passively held during the action. We identified a sub-group of patients (N = 6) whose accuracy was 2SDs below the controls performances in the real object task. Interestingly, these impaired patients were more affected by the presence of unrelated distracters during both tasks than intact patients and healthy controls. Note that the impaired patients had lesions to left parietal, right anterior temporal and bilateral pre-motor regions. We conclude that: (1) motor procedures guide object selection for action, (2) semantic knowledge affects action-based selection, (3) impaired action decision making is associated with the inability to ignore distracting information and (4) lesions to either the dorsal or ventral visual stream can lead to deficits in making action decisions. Overall, the data indicate that impairments in everyday tasks can be evaluated using a simulated computer task. The implications for rehabilitation are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4406091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44060912015-05-07 Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action Wulff, Melanie Laverick, Rosanna Humphreys, Glyn W. Wing, Alan M. Rotshtein, Pia Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience We assessed the factors which affect the selection of objects for action, focusing on the role of action knowledge and its modulation by distracters. Fourteen neuropsychological patients and 10 healthy aged-matched controls selected pairs of objects commonly used together among distracters in two contexts: with real objects and with pictures of the same objects presented sequentially on a computer screen. Across both tasks, semantically related distracters led to slower responses and more errors than unrelated distracters and the object actively used for action was selected prior to the object that would be passively held during the action. We identified a sub-group of patients (N = 6) whose accuracy was 2SDs below the controls performances in the real object task. Interestingly, these impaired patients were more affected by the presence of unrelated distracters during both tasks than intact patients and healthy controls. Note that the impaired patients had lesions to left parietal, right anterior temporal and bilateral pre-motor regions. We conclude that: (1) motor procedures guide object selection for action, (2) semantic knowledge affects action-based selection, (3) impaired action decision making is associated with the inability to ignore distracting information and (4) lesions to either the dorsal or ventral visual stream can lead to deficits in making action decisions. Overall, the data indicate that impairments in everyday tasks can be evaluated using a simulated computer task. The implications for rehabilitation are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4406091/ /pubmed/25954177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00199 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wulff, Laverick, Humphreys, Wing and Rotshtein. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Wulff, Melanie Laverick, Rosanna Humphreys, Glyn W. Wing, Alan M. Rotshtein, Pia Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
title | Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
title_full | Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
title_fullStr | Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
title_short | Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
title_sort | mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25954177 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wulffmelanie mechanismsunderlyingselectingobjectsforaction AT laverickrosanna mechanismsunderlyingselectingobjectsforaction AT humphreysglynw mechanismsunderlyingselectingobjectsforaction AT wingalanm mechanismsunderlyingselectingobjectsforaction AT rotshteinpia mechanismsunderlyingselectingobjectsforaction |