Cargando…
Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124440 |
_version_ | 1782367792975052800 |
---|---|
author | Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond Kwon, Keon-Woo Michael, Praveesuda Ting, Richard Kim, Ju-Young Jin, Moonsoo M. |
author_facet | Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond Kwon, Keon-Woo Michael, Praveesuda Ting, Richard Kim, Ju-Young Jin, Moonsoo M. |
author_sort | Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined for tumor uptake and internalization at the whole body, ex-vivo tissue, and cellular levels: antibodies, antibody fragments (Fab), serum albumin, and streptavidin. The time of peak tumor uptake was dependent solely on the size of molecules, suggesting that molecular size is the major factor that influences tumor uptake by its effect on systemic clearance and diffusion into tumor. Affinity to tumor antigen failed to augment tumor uptake of Fab above non-specific accumulation, which suggests that Fab fragments of typical monoclonal antibodies may fall below an affinity threshold for use as molecular imaging agents. Despite abundant localization into the tumor, albumin and streptavidin were not found on cell surface or inside cells. By comparing biomolecules differing in size and affinity, our study highlights that while pharmacokinetics are a dominant factor in tumor uptake for biomolecules, affinity to tumor antigen is required for tumor binding and internalization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4406587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44065872015-05-07 Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond Kwon, Keon-Woo Michael, Praveesuda Ting, Richard Kim, Ju-Young Jin, Moonsoo M. PLoS One Research Article The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined for tumor uptake and internalization at the whole body, ex-vivo tissue, and cellular levels: antibodies, antibody fragments (Fab), serum albumin, and streptavidin. The time of peak tumor uptake was dependent solely on the size of molecules, suggesting that molecular size is the major factor that influences tumor uptake by its effect on systemic clearance and diffusion into tumor. Affinity to tumor antigen failed to augment tumor uptake of Fab above non-specific accumulation, which suggests that Fab fragments of typical monoclonal antibodies may fall below an affinity threshold for use as molecular imaging agents. Despite abundant localization into the tumor, albumin and streptavidin were not found on cell surface or inside cells. By comparing biomolecules differing in size and affinity, our study highlights that while pharmacokinetics are a dominant factor in tumor uptake for biomolecules, affinity to tumor antigen is required for tumor binding and internalization. Public Library of Science 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4406587/ /pubmed/25901755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124440 Text en © 2015 Leelawattanachai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond Kwon, Keon-Woo Michael, Praveesuda Ting, Richard Kim, Ju-Young Jin, Moonsoo M. Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization |
title | Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization |
title_full | Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization |
title_fullStr | Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization |
title_full_unstemmed | Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization |
title_short | Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization |
title_sort | side-by-side comparison of commonly used biomolecules that differ in size and affinity on tumor uptake and internalization |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leelawattanachaijeerapond sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization AT kwonkeonwoo sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization AT michaelpraveesuda sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization AT tingrichard sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization AT kimjuyoung sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization AT jinmoonsoom sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization |