Cargando…

Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization

The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond, Kwon, Keon-Woo, Michael, Praveesuda, Ting, Richard, Kim, Ju-Young, Jin, Moonsoo M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124440
_version_ 1782367792975052800
author Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond
Kwon, Keon-Woo
Michael, Praveesuda
Ting, Richard
Kim, Ju-Young
Jin, Moonsoo M.
author_facet Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond
Kwon, Keon-Woo
Michael, Praveesuda
Ting, Richard
Kim, Ju-Young
Jin, Moonsoo M.
author_sort Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond
collection PubMed
description The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined for tumor uptake and internalization at the whole body, ex-vivo tissue, and cellular levels: antibodies, antibody fragments (Fab), serum albumin, and streptavidin. The time of peak tumor uptake was dependent solely on the size of molecules, suggesting that molecular size is the major factor that influences tumor uptake by its effect on systemic clearance and diffusion into tumor. Affinity to tumor antigen failed to augment tumor uptake of Fab above non-specific accumulation, which suggests that Fab fragments of typical monoclonal antibodies may fall below an affinity threshold for use as molecular imaging agents. Despite abundant localization into the tumor, albumin and streptavidin were not found on cell surface or inside cells. By comparing biomolecules differing in size and affinity, our study highlights that while pharmacokinetics are a dominant factor in tumor uptake for biomolecules, affinity to tumor antigen is required for tumor binding and internalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4406587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44065872015-05-07 Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond Kwon, Keon-Woo Michael, Praveesuda Ting, Richard Kim, Ju-Young Jin, Moonsoo M. PLoS One Research Article The ability to use a systemically injected agent to image tumor is influenced by tumor characteristics such as permeability and vascularity, and the size, shape, and affinity of the imaging agent. In this study, six different imaging biomolecules, with or without specificity to tumor, were examined for tumor uptake and internalization at the whole body, ex-vivo tissue, and cellular levels: antibodies, antibody fragments (Fab), serum albumin, and streptavidin. The time of peak tumor uptake was dependent solely on the size of molecules, suggesting that molecular size is the major factor that influences tumor uptake by its effect on systemic clearance and diffusion into tumor. Affinity to tumor antigen failed to augment tumor uptake of Fab above non-specific accumulation, which suggests that Fab fragments of typical monoclonal antibodies may fall below an affinity threshold for use as molecular imaging agents. Despite abundant localization into the tumor, albumin and streptavidin were not found on cell surface or inside cells. By comparing biomolecules differing in size and affinity, our study highlights that while pharmacokinetics are a dominant factor in tumor uptake for biomolecules, affinity to tumor antigen is required for tumor binding and internalization. Public Library of Science 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4406587/ /pubmed/25901755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124440 Text en © 2015 Leelawattanachai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leelawattanachai, Jeerapond
Kwon, Keon-Woo
Michael, Praveesuda
Ting, Richard
Kim, Ju-Young
Jin, Moonsoo M.
Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
title Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
title_full Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
title_fullStr Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
title_full_unstemmed Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
title_short Side-by-Side Comparison of Commonly Used Biomolecules That Differ in Size and Affinity on Tumor Uptake and Internalization
title_sort side-by-side comparison of commonly used biomolecules that differ in size and affinity on tumor uptake and internalization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124440
work_keys_str_mv AT leelawattanachaijeerapond sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization
AT kwonkeonwoo sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization
AT michaelpraveesuda sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization
AT tingrichard sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization
AT kimjuyoung sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization
AT jinmoonsoom sidebysidecomparisonofcommonlyusedbiomoleculesthatdifferinsizeandaffinityontumoruptakeandinternalization