Cargando…

Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) treatment of active trachoma with antibiotic is recommended to be initiated in any district where the prevalence of trachoma inflammation, follicular (TF) is ≥10% in children aged 1–9 years, and then to continue for at least three annual rounds before resur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding-Esch, Emma, Jofre-Bonet, Mireia, Dhanjal, Jaskiran K., Burr, Sarah, Edwards, Tansy, Holland, Martin, Sillah, Ansumana, West, Sheila, Lietman, Tom, Keenan, Jeremy, Mabey, David, Bailey, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003670
_version_ 1782367826882854912
author Harding-Esch, Emma
Jofre-Bonet, Mireia
Dhanjal, Jaskiran K.
Burr, Sarah
Edwards, Tansy
Holland, Martin
Sillah, Ansumana
West, Sheila
Lietman, Tom
Keenan, Jeremy
Mabey, David
Bailey, Robin
author_facet Harding-Esch, Emma
Jofre-Bonet, Mireia
Dhanjal, Jaskiran K.
Burr, Sarah
Edwards, Tansy
Holland, Martin
Sillah, Ansumana
West, Sheila
Lietman, Tom
Keenan, Jeremy
Mabey, David
Bailey, Robin
author_sort Harding-Esch, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) treatment of active trachoma with antibiotic is recommended to be initiated in any district where the prevalence of trachoma inflammation, follicular (TF) is ≥10% in children aged 1–9 years, and then to continue for at least three annual rounds before resurvey. In The Gambia the PRET study found that discontinuing MDA based on testing a sample of children for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis(Ct) infection after one MDA round had similar effects to continuing MDA for three rounds. Moreover, one round of MDA reduced disease below the 5% TF threshold. We compared the costs of examining a sample of children for TF, and of testing them for Ct, with those of MDA rounds. METHODS: The implementation unit in PRET The Gambia was a census enumeration area (EA) of 600–800 people. Personnel, fuel, equipment, consumables, data entry and supervision costs were collected for census and treatment of a sample of EAs and for the examination, sampling and testing for Ct infection of 100 individuals within them. Programme costs and resource savings from testing and treatment strategies were inferred for the 102 EAs in the study area, and compared. RESULTS: Census costs were $103.24 per EA plus initial costs of $108.79. MDA with donated azithromycin cost $227.23 per EA. The mean cost of examining and testing 100 children was $796.90 per EA, with Ct testing kits costing $4.80 per result. A strategy of testing each EA for infection is more expensive than two annual rounds of MDA unless the kit cost is less than $1.38 per result. However stopping or deciding not to initiate treatment in the study area based on testing a sample of EAs for Ct infection (or examining children in a sample of EAs) creates savings relative to further unnecessary treatments. CONCLUSION: Resources may be saved by using tests for chlamydial infection or clinical examination to determine that initial or subsequent rounds of MDA for trachoma are unnecessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4406756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44067562015-05-07 Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study Harding-Esch, Emma Jofre-Bonet, Mireia Dhanjal, Jaskiran K. Burr, Sarah Edwards, Tansy Holland, Martin Sillah, Ansumana West, Sheila Lietman, Tom Keenan, Jeremy Mabey, David Bailey, Robin PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) treatment of active trachoma with antibiotic is recommended to be initiated in any district where the prevalence of trachoma inflammation, follicular (TF) is ≥10% in children aged 1–9 years, and then to continue for at least three annual rounds before resurvey. In The Gambia the PRET study found that discontinuing MDA based on testing a sample of children for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis(Ct) infection after one MDA round had similar effects to continuing MDA for three rounds. Moreover, one round of MDA reduced disease below the 5% TF threshold. We compared the costs of examining a sample of children for TF, and of testing them for Ct, with those of MDA rounds. METHODS: The implementation unit in PRET The Gambia was a census enumeration area (EA) of 600–800 people. Personnel, fuel, equipment, consumables, data entry and supervision costs were collected for census and treatment of a sample of EAs and for the examination, sampling and testing for Ct infection of 100 individuals within them. Programme costs and resource savings from testing and treatment strategies were inferred for the 102 EAs in the study area, and compared. RESULTS: Census costs were $103.24 per EA plus initial costs of $108.79. MDA with donated azithromycin cost $227.23 per EA. The mean cost of examining and testing 100 children was $796.90 per EA, with Ct testing kits costing $4.80 per result. A strategy of testing each EA for infection is more expensive than two annual rounds of MDA unless the kit cost is less than $1.38 per result. However stopping or deciding not to initiate treatment in the study area based on testing a sample of EAs for Ct infection (or examining children in a sample of EAs) creates savings relative to further unnecessary treatments. CONCLUSION: Resources may be saved by using tests for chlamydial infection or clinical examination to determine that initial or subsequent rounds of MDA for trachoma are unnecessary. Public Library of Science 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4406756/ /pubmed/25901349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003670 Text en © 2015 Harding-Esch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harding-Esch, Emma
Jofre-Bonet, Mireia
Dhanjal, Jaskiran K.
Burr, Sarah
Edwards, Tansy
Holland, Martin
Sillah, Ansumana
West, Sheila
Lietman, Tom
Keenan, Jeremy
Mabey, David
Bailey, Robin
Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study
title Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study
title_full Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study
title_fullStr Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study
title_full_unstemmed Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study
title_short Costs of Testing for Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Compared to Mass Drug Administration for Trachoma in The Gambia: Application of Results from the PRET Study
title_sort costs of testing for ocular chlamydia trachomatis infection compared to mass drug administration for trachoma in the gambia: application of results from the pret study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003670
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingeschemma costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT jofrebonetmireia costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT dhanjaljaskirank costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT burrsarah costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT edwardstansy costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT hollandmartin costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT sillahansumana costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT westsheila costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT lietmantom costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT keenanjeremy costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT mabeydavid costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy
AT baileyrobin costsoftestingforocularchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioncomparedtomassdrugadministrationfortrachomainthegambiaapplicationofresultsfromthepretstudy