Cargando…
Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction
Fragment-based approaches are the current standard for de novo protein structure prediction. These approaches rely on accurate and reliable fragment libraries to generate good structural models. In this work, we describe a novel method for structure fragment library generation and its application in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123998 |
_version_ | 1782367827111444480 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Saulo H. P. Shi, Jiye Deane, Charlotte M. |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Saulo H. P. Shi, Jiye Deane, Charlotte M. |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Saulo H. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fragment-based approaches are the current standard for de novo protein structure prediction. These approaches rely on accurate and reliable fragment libraries to generate good structural models. In this work, we describe a novel method for structure fragment library generation and its application in fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction. The importance of correct testing procedures in assessing the quality of fragment libraries is demonstrated. In particular, the exclusion of homologs to the target from the libraries to correctly simulate a de novo protein structure prediction scenario, something which surprisingly is not always done. We demonstrate that fragments presenting different predominant predicted secondary structures should be treated differently during the fragment library generation step and that exhaustive and random search strategies should both be used. This information was used to develop a novel method, Flib. On a validation set of 41 structurally diverse proteins, Flib libraries presents both a higher precision and coverage than two of the state-of-the-art methods, NNMake and HHFrag. Flib also achieves better precision and coverage on the set of 275 protein domains used in the two previous experiments of the the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP9 and CASP10). We compared Flib libraries against NNMake libraries in a structure prediction context. Of the 13 cases in which a correct answer was generated, Flib models were more accurate than NNMake models for 10. “Flib is available for download at: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/research/proteins/resources”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4406757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44067572015-05-07 Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction de Oliveira, Saulo H. P. Shi, Jiye Deane, Charlotte M. PLoS One Research Article Fragment-based approaches are the current standard for de novo protein structure prediction. These approaches rely on accurate and reliable fragment libraries to generate good structural models. In this work, we describe a novel method for structure fragment library generation and its application in fragment-based de novo protein structure prediction. The importance of correct testing procedures in assessing the quality of fragment libraries is demonstrated. In particular, the exclusion of homologs to the target from the libraries to correctly simulate a de novo protein structure prediction scenario, something which surprisingly is not always done. We demonstrate that fragments presenting different predominant predicted secondary structures should be treated differently during the fragment library generation step and that exhaustive and random search strategies should both be used. This information was used to develop a novel method, Flib. On a validation set of 41 structurally diverse proteins, Flib libraries presents both a higher precision and coverage than two of the state-of-the-art methods, NNMake and HHFrag. Flib also achieves better precision and coverage on the set of 275 protein domains used in the two previous experiments of the the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP9 and CASP10). We compared Flib libraries against NNMake libraries in a structure prediction context. Of the 13 cases in which a correct answer was generated, Flib models were more accurate than NNMake models for 10. “Flib is available for download at: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/research/proteins/resources”. Public Library of Science 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4406757/ /pubmed/25901595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123998 Text en © 2015 de Oliveira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Oliveira, Saulo H. P. Shi, Jiye Deane, Charlotte M. Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction |
title | Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction |
title_full | Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction |
title_fullStr | Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction |
title_short | Building a Better Fragment Library for De Novo Protein Structure Prediction |
title_sort | building a better fragment library for de novo protein structure prediction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4406757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25901595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirasaulohp buildingabetterfragmentlibraryfordenovoproteinstructureprediction AT shijiye buildingabetterfragmentlibraryfordenovoproteinstructureprediction AT deanecharlottem buildingabetterfragmentlibraryfordenovoproteinstructureprediction |