Cargando…

3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review

BACKGROUND: Immersive patient simulators (IPSs) combine the simulation of virtual patients with a three-dimensional (3D) environment and, thus, allow an illusionary immersion into a synthetic world, similar to computer games. Playful learning in a 3D environment is motivating and allows repetitive t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleinert, Robert, Wahba, Roger, Chang, De-Hua, Plum, Patrick, Hölscher, Arnulf H, Stippel, Dirk L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4407019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25858862
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3492
_version_ 1782367845131223040
author Kleinert, Robert
Wahba, Roger
Chang, De-Hua
Plum, Patrick
Hölscher, Arnulf H
Stippel, Dirk L
author_facet Kleinert, Robert
Wahba, Roger
Chang, De-Hua
Plum, Patrick
Hölscher, Arnulf H
Stippel, Dirk L
author_sort Kleinert, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immersive patient simulators (IPSs) combine the simulation of virtual patients with a three-dimensional (3D) environment and, thus, allow an illusionary immersion into a synthetic world, similar to computer games. Playful learning in a 3D environment is motivating and allows repetitive training and internalization of medical workflows (ie, procedural knowledge) without compromising real patients. The impact of this innovative educational concept on learning success requires review of feasibility and validity. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this paper to conduct a survey of all immersive patient simulators currently available. In addition, we address the question of whether the use of these simulators has an impact on knowledge gain by summarizing the existing validation studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search via PubMed was performed using predefined inclusion criteria (ie, virtual worlds, focus on education of medical students, validation testing) to identify all available simulators. Validation testing was defined as the primary end point. RESULTS: There are currently 13 immersive patient simulators available. Of these, 9 are Web-based simulators and represent feasibility studies. None of these simulators are used routinely for student education. The workstation-based simulators are commercially driven and show a higher quality in terms of graphical quality and/or data content. Out of the studies, 1 showed a positive correlation between simulated content and real content (ie, content validity). There was a positive correlation between the outcome of simulator training and alternative training methods (ie, concordance validity), and a positive coherence between measured outcome and future professional attitude and performance (ie, predictive validity). CONCLUSIONS: IPSs can promote learning and consolidation of procedural knowledge. The use of immersive patient simulators is still marginal, and technical and educational approaches are heterogeneous. Academic-driven IPSs could possibly enhance the content quality, improve the validity level, and make this educational concept accessible to all medical students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4407019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44070192015-04-28 3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review Kleinert, Robert Wahba, Roger Chang, De-Hua Plum, Patrick Hölscher, Arnulf H Stippel, Dirk L J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Immersive patient simulators (IPSs) combine the simulation of virtual patients with a three-dimensional (3D) environment and, thus, allow an illusionary immersion into a synthetic world, similar to computer games. Playful learning in a 3D environment is motivating and allows repetitive training and internalization of medical workflows (ie, procedural knowledge) without compromising real patients. The impact of this innovative educational concept on learning success requires review of feasibility and validity. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this paper to conduct a survey of all immersive patient simulators currently available. In addition, we address the question of whether the use of these simulators has an impact on knowledge gain by summarizing the existing validation studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search via PubMed was performed using predefined inclusion criteria (ie, virtual worlds, focus on education of medical students, validation testing) to identify all available simulators. Validation testing was defined as the primary end point. RESULTS: There are currently 13 immersive patient simulators available. Of these, 9 are Web-based simulators and represent feasibility studies. None of these simulators are used routinely for student education. The workstation-based simulators are commercially driven and show a higher quality in terms of graphical quality and/or data content. Out of the studies, 1 showed a positive correlation between simulated content and real content (ie, content validity). There was a positive correlation between the outcome of simulator training and alternative training methods (ie, concordance validity), and a positive coherence between measured outcome and future professional attitude and performance (ie, predictive validity). CONCLUSIONS: IPSs can promote learning and consolidation of procedural knowledge. The use of immersive patient simulators is still marginal, and technical and educational approaches are heterogeneous. Academic-driven IPSs could possibly enhance the content quality, improve the validity level, and make this educational concept accessible to all medical students. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4407019/ /pubmed/25858862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3492 Text en ©Robert Kleinert, Roger Wahba, De-Hua Chang, Patrick Plum, Arnulf H Hölscher, Dirk L Stippel. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.04.2015. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Kleinert, Robert
Wahba, Roger
Chang, De-Hua
Plum, Patrick
Hölscher, Arnulf H
Stippel, Dirk L
3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review
title 3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review
title_full 3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review
title_fullStr 3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review
title_full_unstemmed 3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review
title_short 3D Immersive Patient Simulators and Their Impact on Learning Success: A Thematic Review
title_sort 3d immersive patient simulators and their impact on learning success: a thematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4407019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25858862
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3492
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinertrobert 3dimmersivepatientsimulatorsandtheirimpactonlearningsuccessathematicreview
AT wahbaroger 3dimmersivepatientsimulatorsandtheirimpactonlearningsuccessathematicreview
AT changdehua 3dimmersivepatientsimulatorsandtheirimpactonlearningsuccessathematicreview
AT plumpatrick 3dimmersivepatientsimulatorsandtheirimpactonlearningsuccessathematicreview
AT holscherarnulfh 3dimmersivepatientsimulatorsandtheirimpactonlearningsuccessathematicreview
AT stippeldirkl 3dimmersivepatientsimulatorsandtheirimpactonlearningsuccessathematicreview