Cargando…

Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits

BACKGROUND: Atypical self-processing is an emerging theme in autism research, suggested by lower self-reference effect in memory, and atypical neural responses to visual self-representations. Most research on physical self-processing in autism uses visual stimuli. However, the self is a multimodal c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chakraborty, Anya, Chakrabarti, Bhismadev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4407378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-015-0016-1
_version_ 1782367897664880640
author Chakraborty, Anya
Chakrabarti, Bhismadev
author_facet Chakraborty, Anya
Chakrabarti, Bhismadev
author_sort Chakraborty, Anya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atypical self-processing is an emerging theme in autism research, suggested by lower self-reference effect in memory, and atypical neural responses to visual self-representations. Most research on physical self-processing in autism uses visual stimuli. However, the self is a multimodal construct, and therefore, it is essential to test self-recognition in other sensory modalities as well. Self-recognition in the auditory modality remains relatively unexplored and has not been tested in relation to autism and related traits. This study investigates self-recognition in auditory and visual domain in the general population and tests if it is associated with autistic traits. METHODS: Thirty-nine neurotypical adults participated in a two-part study. In the first session, individual participant’s voice was recorded and face was photographed and morphed respectively with voices and faces from unfamiliar identities. In the second session, participants performed a ‘self-identification’ task, classifying each morph as ‘self’ voice (or face) or an ‘other’ voice (or face). All participants also completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). For each sensory modality, slope of the self-recognition curve was used as individual self-recognition metric. These two self-recognition metrics were tested for association between each other, and with autistic traits. RESULTS: Fifty percent ‘self’ response was reached for a higher percentage of self in the auditory domain compared to the visual domain (t = 3.142; P < 0.01). No significant correlation was noted between self-recognition bias across sensory modalities (τ = −0.165, P = 0.204). Higher recognition bias for self-voice was observed in individuals higher in autistic traits (τ(AQ) = 0.301, P = 0.008). No such correlation was observed between recognition bias for self-face and autistic traits (τ(AQ) = −0.020, P = 0.438). CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that recognition bias for physical self-representation is not related across sensory modalities. Further, individuals with higher autistic traits were better able to discriminate self from other voices, but this relation was not observed with self-face. A narrow self-other overlap in the auditory domain seen in individuals with high autistic traits could arise due to enhanced perceptual processing of auditory stimuli often observed in individuals with autism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4407378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44073782015-04-24 Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits Chakraborty, Anya Chakrabarti, Bhismadev Mol Autism Research BACKGROUND: Atypical self-processing is an emerging theme in autism research, suggested by lower self-reference effect in memory, and atypical neural responses to visual self-representations. Most research on physical self-processing in autism uses visual stimuli. However, the self is a multimodal construct, and therefore, it is essential to test self-recognition in other sensory modalities as well. Self-recognition in the auditory modality remains relatively unexplored and has not been tested in relation to autism and related traits. This study investigates self-recognition in auditory and visual domain in the general population and tests if it is associated with autistic traits. METHODS: Thirty-nine neurotypical adults participated in a two-part study. In the first session, individual participant’s voice was recorded and face was photographed and morphed respectively with voices and faces from unfamiliar identities. In the second session, participants performed a ‘self-identification’ task, classifying each morph as ‘self’ voice (or face) or an ‘other’ voice (or face). All participants also completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). For each sensory modality, slope of the self-recognition curve was used as individual self-recognition metric. These two self-recognition metrics were tested for association between each other, and with autistic traits. RESULTS: Fifty percent ‘self’ response was reached for a higher percentage of self in the auditory domain compared to the visual domain (t = 3.142; P < 0.01). No significant correlation was noted between self-recognition bias across sensory modalities (τ = −0.165, P = 0.204). Higher recognition bias for self-voice was observed in individuals higher in autistic traits (τ(AQ) = 0.301, P = 0.008). No such correlation was observed between recognition bias for self-face and autistic traits (τ(AQ) = −0.020, P = 0.438). CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that recognition bias for physical self-representation is not related across sensory modalities. Further, individuals with higher autistic traits were better able to discriminate self from other voices, but this relation was not observed with self-face. A narrow self-other overlap in the auditory domain seen in individuals with high autistic traits could arise due to enhanced perceptual processing of auditory stimuli often observed in individuals with autism. BioMed Central 2015-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4407378/ /pubmed/25908952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-015-0016-1 Text en © Chakraborty and Chakrabarti; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chakraborty, Anya
Chakrabarti, Bhismadev
Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
title Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
title_full Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
title_fullStr Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
title_full_unstemmed Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
title_short Is it me? Self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
title_sort is it me? self-recognition bias across sensory modalities and its relationship to autistic traits
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4407378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-015-0016-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chakrabortyanya isitmeselfrecognitionbiasacrosssensorymodalitiesanditsrelationshiptoautistictraits
AT chakrabartibhismadev isitmeselfrecognitionbiasacrosssensorymodalitiesanditsrelationshiptoautistictraits