Cargando…

Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials

BACKGROUND: Effective strategies for contacting and recruiting study participants are critical in conducting clinical research. In this study, we conducted two sequential randomized controlled trials of mail- and telephone-based strategies for contacting and recruiting participants, and evaluated pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinglas, Victor D, Huang, Minxuan, Sepulveda, Kristin A, Pinedo, Mariela, Hopkins, Ramona O, Colantuoni, Elizabeth, Needham, Dale M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4407535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25575599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-15-5
_version_ 1782367924623769600
author Dinglas, Victor D
Huang, Minxuan
Sepulveda, Kristin A
Pinedo, Mariela
Hopkins, Ramona O
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Needham, Dale M
author_facet Dinglas, Victor D
Huang, Minxuan
Sepulveda, Kristin A
Pinedo, Mariela
Hopkins, Ramona O
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Needham, Dale M
author_sort Dinglas, Victor D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective strategies for contacting and recruiting study participants are critical in conducting clinical research. In this study, we conducted two sequential randomized controlled trials of mail- and telephone-based strategies for contacting and recruiting participants, and evaluated participant-related variables’ association with time to survey completion and survey completion rates. Subjects eligible for this study were survivors of acute lung injury who had been previously enrolled in a 12-month observational follow-up study evaluating their physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes, with their last study visit completed at a median of 34 months previously. METHODS: Eligible subjects were contacted to complete a new research survey as part of two randomized trials, initially using a randomized mail-based contact strategy, followed by a randomized telephone-based contact strategy for non-responders to the mail strategy. Both strategies focused on using either a personalized versus a generic approach. In addition, 18 potentially relevant subject-related variables (e.g., demographics, last known physical and mental health status) were evaluated for association with time to survey completion. RESULTS: Of 308 eligible subjects, 67% completed the survey with a median (IQR) of 3 (2, 5) contact attempts required. There was no significant difference in the time to survey completion for either randomized trial of mail- or phone-based contact strategy. Among all subject-related variables, age ≤40 years and minority race were independently associated with a longer time to survey completion. CONCLUSION: We found that age ≤40 years and minority race were associated with a longer time to survey completion, but personalized versus generic approaches to mail- and telephone-based contact strategies had no significant effect. Repeating both mail and telephone contact attempts was important for increasing survey completion rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00719446.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4407535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44075352015-04-24 Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials Dinglas, Victor D Huang, Minxuan Sepulveda, Kristin A Pinedo, Mariela Hopkins, Ramona O Colantuoni, Elizabeth Needham, Dale M BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Effective strategies for contacting and recruiting study participants are critical in conducting clinical research. In this study, we conducted two sequential randomized controlled trials of mail- and telephone-based strategies for contacting and recruiting participants, and evaluated participant-related variables’ association with time to survey completion and survey completion rates. Subjects eligible for this study were survivors of acute lung injury who had been previously enrolled in a 12-month observational follow-up study evaluating their physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes, with their last study visit completed at a median of 34 months previously. METHODS: Eligible subjects were contacted to complete a new research survey as part of two randomized trials, initially using a randomized mail-based contact strategy, followed by a randomized telephone-based contact strategy for non-responders to the mail strategy. Both strategies focused on using either a personalized versus a generic approach. In addition, 18 potentially relevant subject-related variables (e.g., demographics, last known physical and mental health status) were evaluated for association with time to survey completion. RESULTS: Of 308 eligible subjects, 67% completed the survey with a median (IQR) of 3 (2, 5) contact attempts required. There was no significant difference in the time to survey completion for either randomized trial of mail- or phone-based contact strategy. Among all subject-related variables, age ≤40 years and minority race were independently associated with a longer time to survey completion. CONCLUSION: We found that age ≤40 years and minority race were associated with a longer time to survey completion, but personalized versus generic approaches to mail- and telephone-based contact strategies had no significant effect. Repeating both mail and telephone contact attempts was important for increasing survey completion rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00719446. BioMed Central 2015-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4407535/ /pubmed/25575599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-15-5 Text en © Dinglas et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dinglas, Victor D
Huang, Minxuan
Sepulveda, Kristin A
Pinedo, Mariela
Hopkins, Ramona O
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Needham, Dale M
Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
title Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
title_full Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
title_fullStr Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
title_full_unstemmed Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
title_short Personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
title_sort personalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4407535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25575599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-15-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dinglasvictord personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT huangminxuan personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT sepulvedakristina personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT pinedomariela personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT hopkinsramonao personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT colantuonielizabeth personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT needhamdalem personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials
AT personalizedcontactstrategiesandpredictorsoftimetosurveycompletionanalysisoftwosequentialrandomizedtrials