Cargando…

The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors

A novel strategy to control membrane bioreactor (MBR) biofouling using the nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PROLI NONOate was examined. When the biofilm was pre-established on membranes at transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 88–90 kPa, backwashing of the membrane module with 80 μM PROLI NONOate for 45 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Jinxue, Zhang, Jinsong, Barnes, Robert J, Tan, Xiaohui, McDougald, Diane, Fane, Anthony G, Zhuang, Guoqiang, Kjelleberg, Staffan, Cohen, Yehuda, Rice, Scott A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25752591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12261
_version_ 1782368032023117824
author Luo, Jinxue
Zhang, Jinsong
Barnes, Robert J
Tan, Xiaohui
McDougald, Diane
Fane, Anthony G
Zhuang, Guoqiang
Kjelleberg, Staffan
Cohen, Yehuda
Rice, Scott A
author_facet Luo, Jinxue
Zhang, Jinsong
Barnes, Robert J
Tan, Xiaohui
McDougald, Diane
Fane, Anthony G
Zhuang, Guoqiang
Kjelleberg, Staffan
Cohen, Yehuda
Rice, Scott A
author_sort Luo, Jinxue
collection PubMed
description A novel strategy to control membrane bioreactor (MBR) biofouling using the nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PROLI NONOate was examined. When the biofilm was pre-established on membranes at transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 88–90 kPa, backwashing of the membrane module with 80 μM PROLI NONOate for 45 min once daily for 37 days reduced the fouling resistance (R(f)) by 56%. Similarly, a daily, 1 h exposure of the membrane to 80 μM PROLI NONOate from the commencement of MBR operation for 85 days resulted in reduction of the TMP and R(f) by 32.3% and 28.2%. The microbial community in the control MBR was observed to change from days 71 to 85, which correlates with the rapid TMP increase. Interestingly, NO-treated biofilms at 85 days had a higher similarity with the control biofilms at 71 days relative to the control biofilms at 85 days, indicating that the NO treatment delayed the development of biofilm bacterial community. Despite this difference, sequence analysis indicated that NO treatment did not result in a significant shift in the dominant fouling species. Confocal microscopy revealed that the biomass of biopolymers and microorganisms in biofilms were all reduced on the PROLI NONOate-treated membranes, where there were reductions of 37.7% for proteins and 66.7% for microbial cells, which correlates with the reduction in TMP. These results suggest that NO treatment could be a promising strategy to control biofouling in MBRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4408187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44081872015-05-01 The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors Luo, Jinxue Zhang, Jinsong Barnes, Robert J Tan, Xiaohui McDougald, Diane Fane, Anthony G Zhuang, Guoqiang Kjelleberg, Staffan Cohen, Yehuda Rice, Scott A Microb Biotechnol Research Articles A novel strategy to control membrane bioreactor (MBR) biofouling using the nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PROLI NONOate was examined. When the biofilm was pre-established on membranes at transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 88–90 kPa, backwashing of the membrane module with 80 μM PROLI NONOate for 45 min once daily for 37 days reduced the fouling resistance (R(f)) by 56%. Similarly, a daily, 1 h exposure of the membrane to 80 μM PROLI NONOate from the commencement of MBR operation for 85 days resulted in reduction of the TMP and R(f) by 32.3% and 28.2%. The microbial community in the control MBR was observed to change from days 71 to 85, which correlates with the rapid TMP increase. Interestingly, NO-treated biofilms at 85 days had a higher similarity with the control biofilms at 71 days relative to the control biofilms at 85 days, indicating that the NO treatment delayed the development of biofilm bacterial community. Despite this difference, sequence analysis indicated that NO treatment did not result in a significant shift in the dominant fouling species. Confocal microscopy revealed that the biomass of biopolymers and microorganisms in biofilms were all reduced on the PROLI NONOate-treated membranes, where there were reductions of 37.7% for proteins and 66.7% for microbial cells, which correlates with the reduction in TMP. These results suggest that NO treatment could be a promising strategy to control biofouling in MBRs. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-05 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4408187/ /pubmed/25752591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12261 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Luo, Jinxue
Zhang, Jinsong
Barnes, Robert J
Tan, Xiaohui
McDougald, Diane
Fane, Anthony G
Zhuang, Guoqiang
Kjelleberg, Staffan
Cohen, Yehuda
Rice, Scott A
The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
title The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
title_full The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
title_fullStr The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
title_full_unstemmed The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
title_short The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
title_sort application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25752591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12261
work_keys_str_mv AT luojinxue theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT zhangjinsong theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT barnesrobertj theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT tanxiaohui theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT mcdougalddiane theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT faneanthonyg theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT zhuangguoqiang theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT kjellebergstaffan theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT cohenyehuda theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT ricescotta theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT luojinxue applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT zhangjinsong applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT barnesrobertj applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT tanxiaohui applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT mcdougalddiane applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT faneanthonyg applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT zhuangguoqiang applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT kjellebergstaffan applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT cohenyehuda applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors
AT ricescotta applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors