Cargando…
The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors
A novel strategy to control membrane bioreactor (MBR) biofouling using the nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PROLI NONOate was examined. When the biofilm was pre-established on membranes at transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 88–90 kPa, backwashing of the membrane module with 80 μM PROLI NONOate for 45 m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25752591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12261 |
_version_ | 1782368032023117824 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Jinxue Zhang, Jinsong Barnes, Robert J Tan, Xiaohui McDougald, Diane Fane, Anthony G Zhuang, Guoqiang Kjelleberg, Staffan Cohen, Yehuda Rice, Scott A |
author_facet | Luo, Jinxue Zhang, Jinsong Barnes, Robert J Tan, Xiaohui McDougald, Diane Fane, Anthony G Zhuang, Guoqiang Kjelleberg, Staffan Cohen, Yehuda Rice, Scott A |
author_sort | Luo, Jinxue |
collection | PubMed |
description | A novel strategy to control membrane bioreactor (MBR) biofouling using the nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PROLI NONOate was examined. When the biofilm was pre-established on membranes at transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 88–90 kPa, backwashing of the membrane module with 80 μM PROLI NONOate for 45 min once daily for 37 days reduced the fouling resistance (R(f)) by 56%. Similarly, a daily, 1 h exposure of the membrane to 80 μM PROLI NONOate from the commencement of MBR operation for 85 days resulted in reduction of the TMP and R(f) by 32.3% and 28.2%. The microbial community in the control MBR was observed to change from days 71 to 85, which correlates with the rapid TMP increase. Interestingly, NO-treated biofilms at 85 days had a higher similarity with the control biofilms at 71 days relative to the control biofilms at 85 days, indicating that the NO treatment delayed the development of biofilm bacterial community. Despite this difference, sequence analysis indicated that NO treatment did not result in a significant shift in the dominant fouling species. Confocal microscopy revealed that the biomass of biopolymers and microorganisms in biofilms were all reduced on the PROLI NONOate-treated membranes, where there were reductions of 37.7% for proteins and 66.7% for microbial cells, which correlates with the reduction in TMP. These results suggest that NO treatment could be a promising strategy to control biofouling in MBRs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4408187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44081872015-05-01 The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors Luo, Jinxue Zhang, Jinsong Barnes, Robert J Tan, Xiaohui McDougald, Diane Fane, Anthony G Zhuang, Guoqiang Kjelleberg, Staffan Cohen, Yehuda Rice, Scott A Microb Biotechnol Research Articles A novel strategy to control membrane bioreactor (MBR) biofouling using the nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PROLI NONOate was examined. When the biofilm was pre-established on membranes at transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 88–90 kPa, backwashing of the membrane module with 80 μM PROLI NONOate for 45 min once daily for 37 days reduced the fouling resistance (R(f)) by 56%. Similarly, a daily, 1 h exposure of the membrane to 80 μM PROLI NONOate from the commencement of MBR operation for 85 days resulted in reduction of the TMP and R(f) by 32.3% and 28.2%. The microbial community in the control MBR was observed to change from days 71 to 85, which correlates with the rapid TMP increase. Interestingly, NO-treated biofilms at 85 days had a higher similarity with the control biofilms at 71 days relative to the control biofilms at 85 days, indicating that the NO treatment delayed the development of biofilm bacterial community. Despite this difference, sequence analysis indicated that NO treatment did not result in a significant shift in the dominant fouling species. Confocal microscopy revealed that the biomass of biopolymers and microorganisms in biofilms were all reduced on the PROLI NONOate-treated membranes, where there were reductions of 37.7% for proteins and 66.7% for microbial cells, which correlates with the reduction in TMP. These results suggest that NO treatment could be a promising strategy to control biofouling in MBRs. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-05 2015-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4408187/ /pubmed/25752591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12261 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Luo, Jinxue Zhang, Jinsong Barnes, Robert J Tan, Xiaohui McDougald, Diane Fane, Anthony G Zhuang, Guoqiang Kjelleberg, Staffan Cohen, Yehuda Rice, Scott A The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
title | The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
title_full | The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
title_fullStr | The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
title_full_unstemmed | The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
title_short | The application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
title_sort | application of nitric oxide to control biofouling of membrane bioreactors |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25752591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luojinxue theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT zhangjinsong theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT barnesrobertj theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT tanxiaohui theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT mcdougalddiane theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT faneanthonyg theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT zhuangguoqiang theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT kjellebergstaffan theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT cohenyehuda theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT ricescotta theapplicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT luojinxue applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT zhangjinsong applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT barnesrobertj applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT tanxiaohui applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT mcdougalddiane applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT faneanthonyg applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT zhuangguoqiang applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT kjellebergstaffan applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT cohenyehuda applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors AT ricescotta applicationofnitricoxidetocontrolbiofoulingofmembranebioreactors |