Cargando…
Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies
INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a social disease caused by numerous contributing factors such as natural childbirth, obesity, hormonal deficiencies and changes in collagen fibers, to name a few. Currently, mini–slings, among all the surgical treatment methods, have gained signific...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25914841 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.01.384 |
_version_ | 1782368051601080320 |
---|---|
author | Blewniewski, Mariusz Markowski, Michał Kliś, Rafał Różański, Waldemar |
author_facet | Blewniewski, Mariusz Markowski, Michał Kliś, Rafał Różański, Waldemar |
author_sort | Blewniewski, Mariusz |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a social disease caused by numerous contributing factors such as natural childbirth, obesity, hormonal deficiencies and changes in collagen fibers, to name a few. Currently, mini–slings, among all the surgical treatment methods, have gained significance. The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness of this method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, one hundred sixty women suffering from SUI underwent surgical procedures to implant mini–slings under the middle part of the urethra and 140 (87.5%) of them remained under observation. In 65 cases, Johnson & Johnson's TVT–Secur was used; in 70 cases, BARD's Adjust mini–sling was used; and in 5 cases, AMS Mini–Arc mini–sling was used. The average period of hospitalization was 3 days per admission, operation and discharge day. RESULTS: In 82 cases, patients urinated well after the removal of the catheter, and had full urine continence. Fourteen patients showed great improvement, and in four cases temporary urine retention was observed. In two cases vaginal bleeding was observed, yet there was no need for wound revision. Evaluation of the ‘quality of life improvement’ was done using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). CONCLUSIONS: The obtained results allowed the conclusion that the implantation of mini–slings is a low invasive, relatively safe and effective procedure for the treatment of SUI even in cases of recurrence. Almost full recovery was achieved in all the cases of this study. The mini–sling has become an important element in modern urogynecology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4408381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44083812015-04-24 Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies Blewniewski, Mariusz Markowski, Michał Kliś, Rafał Różański, Waldemar Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a social disease caused by numerous contributing factors such as natural childbirth, obesity, hormonal deficiencies and changes in collagen fibers, to name a few. Currently, mini–slings, among all the surgical treatment methods, have gained significance. The aim of this study was to establish the effectiveness of this method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, one hundred sixty women suffering from SUI underwent surgical procedures to implant mini–slings under the middle part of the urethra and 140 (87.5%) of them remained under observation. In 65 cases, Johnson & Johnson's TVT–Secur was used; in 70 cases, BARD's Adjust mini–sling was used; and in 5 cases, AMS Mini–Arc mini–sling was used. The average period of hospitalization was 3 days per admission, operation and discharge day. RESULTS: In 82 cases, patients urinated well after the removal of the catheter, and had full urine continence. Fourteen patients showed great improvement, and in four cases temporary urine retention was observed. In two cases vaginal bleeding was observed, yet there was no need for wound revision. Evaluation of the ‘quality of life improvement’ was done using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). CONCLUSIONS: The obtained results allowed the conclusion that the implantation of mini–slings is a low invasive, relatively safe and effective procedure for the treatment of SUI even in cases of recurrence. Almost full recovery was achieved in all the cases of this study. The mini–sling has become an important element in modern urogynecology. Polish Urological Association 2015-03-13 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4408381/ /pubmed/25914841 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.01.384 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Blewniewski, Mariusz Markowski, Michał Kliś, Rafał Różański, Waldemar Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies |
title | Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies |
title_full | Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies |
title_fullStr | Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies |
title_short | Mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. Case studies |
title_sort | mini–slings – an option in stress urinary incontinence treatment. case studies |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25914841 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.01.384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blewniewskimariusz minislingsanoptioninstressurinaryincontinencetreatmentcasestudies AT markowskimichał minislingsanoptioninstressurinaryincontinencetreatmentcasestudies AT klisrafał minislingsanoptioninstressurinaryincontinencetreatmentcasestudies AT rozanskiwaldemar minislingsanoptioninstressurinaryincontinencetreatmentcasestudies |