Cargando…

Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities

BACKGROUND: Cost-utility models are frequently used to compare treatments intended to prevent or delay the onset of cardiovascular events. Most published utilities represent post-event health states without incorporating the disutility of the event or reporting the time between the event and utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matza, Louis S, Stewart, Katie D, Gandra, Shravanthi R, Delio, Philip R, Fenster, Brett E, Davies, Evan W, Jordan, Jessica B, Lothgren, Mickael, Feeny, David H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25896804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0772-9
_version_ 1782368064215449600
author Matza, Louis S
Stewart, Katie D
Gandra, Shravanthi R
Delio, Philip R
Fenster, Brett E
Davies, Evan W
Jordan, Jessica B
Lothgren, Mickael
Feeny, David H
author_facet Matza, Louis S
Stewart, Katie D
Gandra, Shravanthi R
Delio, Philip R
Fenster, Brett E
Davies, Evan W
Jordan, Jessica B
Lothgren, Mickael
Feeny, David H
author_sort Matza, Louis S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cost-utility models are frequently used to compare treatments intended to prevent or delay the onset of cardiovascular events. Most published utilities represent post-event health states without incorporating the disutility of the event or reporting the time between the event and utility assessment. Therefore, this study estimated health state utilities representing cardiovascular conditions while distinguishing between acute impact including the cardiovascular event and the chronic post-event impact. METHODS: Health states were drafted and refined based on literature review, clinician interviews, and a pilot study. Three cardiovascular conditions were described: stroke, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and heart failure. One-year acute health states represented the event and its immediate impact, and post-event health states represented chronic impact. UK general population respondents valued the health states in time trade-off tasks with time horizons of one year for acute states and ten years for chronic states. RESULTS: A total of 200 participants completed interviews (55% female; mean age = 46.6 y). Among acute health states, stroke had the lowest utility (0.33), followed by heart failure (0.60) and ACS (0.67). Utility scores for chronic health states followed the same pattern: stroke (0.52), heart failure (0.57), and ACS (0.82). For stroke and ACS, acute utilities were significantly lower than chronic post-event utilities (difference = 0.20 and 0.15, respectively; both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Results add to previously published utilities for cardiovascular events by distinguishing between chronic post-event health states and acute health states that include the event and its immediate impact. Findings suggest that acute versus chronic impact should be considered when selecting scores for use in cost-utility models. Thus, the current utilities provide a unique option that may be used to represent the acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular conditions in economic models comparing treatments that may delay or prevent the onset of cardiovascular events. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0772-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4408571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44085712015-04-25 Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities Matza, Louis S Stewart, Katie D Gandra, Shravanthi R Delio, Philip R Fenster, Brett E Davies, Evan W Jordan, Jessica B Lothgren, Mickael Feeny, David H BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Cost-utility models are frequently used to compare treatments intended to prevent or delay the onset of cardiovascular events. Most published utilities represent post-event health states without incorporating the disutility of the event or reporting the time between the event and utility assessment. Therefore, this study estimated health state utilities representing cardiovascular conditions while distinguishing between acute impact including the cardiovascular event and the chronic post-event impact. METHODS: Health states were drafted and refined based on literature review, clinician interviews, and a pilot study. Three cardiovascular conditions were described: stroke, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and heart failure. One-year acute health states represented the event and its immediate impact, and post-event health states represented chronic impact. UK general population respondents valued the health states in time trade-off tasks with time horizons of one year for acute states and ten years for chronic states. RESULTS: A total of 200 participants completed interviews (55% female; mean age = 46.6 y). Among acute health states, stroke had the lowest utility (0.33), followed by heart failure (0.60) and ACS (0.67). Utility scores for chronic health states followed the same pattern: stroke (0.52), heart failure (0.57), and ACS (0.82). For stroke and ACS, acute utilities were significantly lower than chronic post-event utilities (difference = 0.20 and 0.15, respectively; both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Results add to previously published utilities for cardiovascular events by distinguishing between chronic post-event health states and acute health states that include the event and its immediate impact. Findings suggest that acute versus chronic impact should be considered when selecting scores for use in cost-utility models. Thus, the current utilities provide a unique option that may be used to represent the acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular conditions in economic models comparing treatments that may delay or prevent the onset of cardiovascular events. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0772-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4408571/ /pubmed/25896804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0772-9 Text en © Matza et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matza, Louis S
Stewart, Katie D
Gandra, Shravanthi R
Delio, Philip R
Fenster, Brett E
Davies, Evan W
Jordan, Jessica B
Lothgren, Mickael
Feeny, David H
Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
title Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
title_full Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
title_fullStr Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
title_full_unstemmed Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
title_short Acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
title_sort acute and chronic impact of cardiovascular events on health state utilities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25896804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0772-9
work_keys_str_mv AT matzalouiss acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT stewartkatied acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT gandrashravanthir acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT deliophilipr acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT fensterbrette acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT daviesevanw acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT jordanjessicab acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT lothgrenmickael acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities
AT feenydavidh acuteandchronicimpactofcardiovasculareventsonhealthstateutilities