Cargando…

The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hillier, Susan, Worley, Anthea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160
_version_ 1782368076030803968
author Hillier, Susan
Worley, Anthea
author_facet Hillier, Susan
Worley, Anthea
author_sort Hillier, Susan
collection PubMed
description The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias approach and trial findings analysed individually and collectively where possible. Twenty RCTs were included (an additional 14 to an earlier systematic review). The population, outcome, and findings were highly heterogeneous. However, meta-analyses were able to be performed with 7 studies, finding in favour of the FM for improving balance in ageing populations (e.g., timed up and go test MD −1.14 sec, 95% CI −1.78, −0.49; and functional reach test MD 6.08 cm, 95% CI 3.41, 8.74). Single studies reported significant positive effects for reduced perceived effort and increased comfort, body image perception, and dexterity. Risk of bias was high, thus tempering some results. Considered as a body of evidence, effects seem to be generic, supporting the proposal that FM works on a learning paradigm rather than disease-based mechanisms. Further research is required; however, in the meantime, clinicians and professionals may promote the use of FM in populations interested in efficient physical performance and self-efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4408630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44086302015-05-06 The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Hillier, Susan Worley, Anthea Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias approach and trial findings analysed individually and collectively where possible. Twenty RCTs were included (an additional 14 to an earlier systematic review). The population, outcome, and findings were highly heterogeneous. However, meta-analyses were able to be performed with 7 studies, finding in favour of the FM for improving balance in ageing populations (e.g., timed up and go test MD −1.14 sec, 95% CI −1.78, −0.49; and functional reach test MD 6.08 cm, 95% CI 3.41, 8.74). Single studies reported significant positive effects for reduced perceived effort and increased comfort, body image perception, and dexterity. Risk of bias was high, thus tempering some results. Considered as a body of evidence, effects seem to be generic, supporting the proposal that FM works on a learning paradigm rather than disease-based mechanisms. Further research is required; however, in the meantime, clinicians and professionals may promote the use of FM in populations interested in efficient physical performance and self-efficacy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4408630/ /pubmed/25949266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 Text en Copyright © 2015 S. Hillier and A. Worley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hillier, Susan
Worley, Anthea
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_full The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_short The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
title_sort effectiveness of the feldenkrais method: a systematic review of the evidence
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160
work_keys_str_mv AT hilliersusan theeffectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT worleyanthea theeffectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT hilliersusan effectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence
AT worleyanthea effectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence