Cargando…
The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 |
_version_ | 1782368076030803968 |
---|---|
author | Hillier, Susan Worley, Anthea |
author_facet | Hillier, Susan Worley, Anthea |
author_sort | Hillier, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias approach and trial findings analysed individually and collectively where possible. Twenty RCTs were included (an additional 14 to an earlier systematic review). The population, outcome, and findings were highly heterogeneous. However, meta-analyses were able to be performed with 7 studies, finding in favour of the FM for improving balance in ageing populations (e.g., timed up and go test MD −1.14 sec, 95% CI −1.78, −0.49; and functional reach test MD 6.08 cm, 95% CI 3.41, 8.74). Single studies reported significant positive effects for reduced perceived effort and increased comfort, body image perception, and dexterity. Risk of bias was high, thus tempering some results. Considered as a body of evidence, effects seem to be generic, supporting the proposal that FM works on a learning paradigm rather than disease-based mechanisms. Further research is required; however, in the meantime, clinicians and professionals may promote the use of FM in populations interested in efficient physical performance and self-efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4408630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44086302015-05-06 The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Hillier, Susan Worley, Anthea Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article The Feldenkrais Method (FM) has broad application in populations interested in improving awareness, health, and ease of function. This review aimed to update the evidence for the benefits of FM, and for which populations. A best practice systematic review protocol was devised. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias approach and trial findings analysed individually and collectively where possible. Twenty RCTs were included (an additional 14 to an earlier systematic review). The population, outcome, and findings were highly heterogeneous. However, meta-analyses were able to be performed with 7 studies, finding in favour of the FM for improving balance in ageing populations (e.g., timed up and go test MD −1.14 sec, 95% CI −1.78, −0.49; and functional reach test MD 6.08 cm, 95% CI 3.41, 8.74). Single studies reported significant positive effects for reduced perceived effort and increased comfort, body image perception, and dexterity. Risk of bias was high, thus tempering some results. Considered as a body of evidence, effects seem to be generic, supporting the proposal that FM works on a learning paradigm rather than disease-based mechanisms. Further research is required; however, in the meantime, clinicians and professionals may promote the use of FM in populations interested in efficient physical performance and self-efficacy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4408630/ /pubmed/25949266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 Text en Copyright © 2015 S. Hillier and A. Worley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hillier, Susan Worley, Anthea The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title | The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_full | The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_fullStr | The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_short | The Effectiveness of the Feldenkrais Method: A Systematic Review of the Evidence |
title_sort | effectiveness of the feldenkrais method: a systematic review of the evidence |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25949266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/752160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilliersusan theeffectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT worleyanthea theeffectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT hilliersusan effectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence AT worleyanthea effectivenessofthefeldenkraismethodasystematicreviewoftheevidence |