Cargando…
Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO(2), the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the format...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430 |
_version_ | 1782368122935705600 |
---|---|
author | Brühl, C Lelieveld, J Tost, H Höpfner, M Glatthor, N |
author_facet | Brühl, C Lelieveld, J Tost, H Höpfner, M Glatthor, N |
author_sort | Brühl, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO(2), the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the formation of stratospheric aerosol. Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and other SO(2) sources, including strong anthropogenic emissions in China, are found to play a minor role except in the lowermost stratosphere. Estimates of volcanic SO(2) emissions are based on satellite observations using Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer and Ozone Monitoring Instrument for total injected mass and Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat or Stratospheric Aerosol and Gases Experiment for the spatial distribution. The 10 year SO(2) and COS data set of MIPAS is also used for model evaluation. The calculated radiative forcing of stratospheric background aerosol including sulfate from COS and small contributions by DMS oxidation, and organic aerosol from biomass burning, is about 0.07W/m(2). For stratospheric sulfate aerosol from medium and small volcanic eruptions between 2005 and 2011 a global radiative forcing up to 0.2W/m(2) is calculated, moderating climate warming, while for the major Pinatubo eruption the simulated forcing reaches 5W/m(2), leading to temporary climate cooling. The Pinatubo simulation demonstrates the importance of radiative feedback on dynamics, e.g., enhanced tropical upwelling, for large volcanic eruptions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4408860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44088602015-04-28 Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC Brühl, C Lelieveld, J Tost, H Höpfner, M Glatthor, N J Geophys Res Atmos Research Articles Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO(2), the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the formation of stratospheric aerosol. Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and other SO(2) sources, including strong anthropogenic emissions in China, are found to play a minor role except in the lowermost stratosphere. Estimates of volcanic SO(2) emissions are based on satellite observations using Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer and Ozone Monitoring Instrument for total injected mass and Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat or Stratospheric Aerosol and Gases Experiment for the spatial distribution. The 10 year SO(2) and COS data set of MIPAS is also used for model evaluation. The calculated radiative forcing of stratospheric background aerosol including sulfate from COS and small contributions by DMS oxidation, and organic aerosol from biomass burning, is about 0.07W/m(2). For stratospheric sulfate aerosol from medium and small volcanic eruptions between 2005 and 2011 a global radiative forcing up to 0.2W/m(2) is calculated, moderating climate warming, while for the major Pinatubo eruption the simulated forcing reaches 5W/m(2), leading to temporary climate cooling. The Pinatubo simulation demonstrates the importance of radiative feedback on dynamics, e.g., enhanced tropical upwelling, for large volcanic eruptions. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-03-16 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4408860/ /pubmed/25932352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430 Text en ©2015. The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Brühl, C Lelieveld, J Tost, H Höpfner, M Glatthor, N Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC |
title | Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC |
title_full | Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC |
title_fullStr | Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC |
title_full_unstemmed | Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC |
title_short | Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC |
title_sort | stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model emac |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruhlc stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac AT lelieveldj stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac AT tosth stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac AT hopfnerm stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac AT glatthorn stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac |