Cargando…

Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC

Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO(2), the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the format...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brühl, C, Lelieveld, J, Tost, H, Höpfner, M, Glatthor, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430
_version_ 1782368122935705600
author Brühl, C
Lelieveld, J
Tost, H
Höpfner, M
Glatthor, N
author_facet Brühl, C
Lelieveld, J
Tost, H
Höpfner, M
Glatthor, N
author_sort Brühl, C
collection PubMed
description Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO(2), the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the formation of stratospheric aerosol. Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and other SO(2) sources, including strong anthropogenic emissions in China, are found to play a minor role except in the lowermost stratosphere. Estimates of volcanic SO(2) emissions are based on satellite observations using Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer and Ozone Monitoring Instrument for total injected mass and Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat or Stratospheric Aerosol and Gases Experiment for the spatial distribution. The 10 year SO(2) and COS data set of MIPAS is also used for model evaluation. The calculated radiative forcing of stratospheric background aerosol including sulfate from COS and small contributions by DMS oxidation, and organic aerosol from biomass burning, is about 0.07W/m(2). For stratospheric sulfate aerosol from medium and small volcanic eruptions between 2005 and 2011 a global radiative forcing up to 0.2W/m(2) is calculated, moderating climate warming, while for the major Pinatubo eruption the simulated forcing reaches 5W/m(2), leading to temporary climate cooling. The Pinatubo simulation demonstrates the importance of radiative feedback on dynamics, e.g., enhanced tropical upwelling, for large volcanic eruptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4408860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44088602015-04-28 Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC Brühl, C Lelieveld, J Tost, H Höpfner, M Glatthor, N J Geophys Res Atmos Research Articles Multiyear simulations with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with a microphysical modal aerosol module at high vertical resolution demonstrate that the sulfur gases COS and SO(2), the latter from low-latitude and midlatitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the formation of stratospheric aerosol. Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and other SO(2) sources, including strong anthropogenic emissions in China, are found to play a minor role except in the lowermost stratosphere. Estimates of volcanic SO(2) emissions are based on satellite observations using Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer and Ozone Monitoring Instrument for total injected mass and Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) on Envisat or Stratospheric Aerosol and Gases Experiment for the spatial distribution. The 10 year SO(2) and COS data set of MIPAS is also used for model evaluation. The calculated radiative forcing of stratospheric background aerosol including sulfate from COS and small contributions by DMS oxidation, and organic aerosol from biomass burning, is about 0.07W/m(2). For stratospheric sulfate aerosol from medium and small volcanic eruptions between 2005 and 2011 a global radiative forcing up to 0.2W/m(2) is calculated, moderating climate warming, while for the major Pinatubo eruption the simulated forcing reaches 5W/m(2), leading to temporary climate cooling. The Pinatubo simulation demonstrates the importance of radiative feedback on dynamics, e.g., enhanced tropical upwelling, for large volcanic eruptions. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-03-16 2015-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4408860/ /pubmed/25932352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430 Text en ©2015. The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Brühl, C
Lelieveld, J
Tost, H
Höpfner, M
Glatthor, N
Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
title Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
title_full Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
title_fullStr Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
title_full_unstemmed Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
title_short Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC
title_sort stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model emac
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4408860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25932352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430
work_keys_str_mv AT bruhlc stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac
AT lelieveldj stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac
AT tosth stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac
AT hopfnerm stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac
AT glatthorn stratosphericsulfuranditsimplicationsforradiativeforcingsimulatedbythechemistryclimatemodelemac