Cargando…

Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after total knee replacement (TKR). There is scope to improve assessment of CPSP after TKR, and this study aimed to develop a core outcome set. METHODS: Eighty patients and 43 clinicians were recruited into a thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wylde, V, MacKichan, F, Bruce, J, Gooberman-Hill, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25154614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.582
_version_ 1782368149777154048
author Wylde, V
MacKichan, F
Bruce, J
Gooberman-Hill, R
author_facet Wylde, V
MacKichan, F
Bruce, J
Gooberman-Hill, R
author_sort Wylde, V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after total knee replacement (TKR). There is scope to improve assessment of CPSP after TKR, and this study aimed to develop a core outcome set. METHODS: Eighty patients and 43 clinicians were recruited into a three-round modified Delphi study. In Round 1, participants were presented with 56 pain features identified from a systematic review, structured interviews with patients and focus groups with clinicians. Participants assigned importance ratings, using a 1–9 scale, to individual pain features; those features rated as most important were retained in subsequent rounds. Consensus that a pain feature should be included in the core outcome set was defined as the feature having a rating of 7–9 by ≥70% of both panels (patients and clinicians) and 1–3 by ≤15% of both panels or rated as 7–9 by ≥90% of one panel. RESULTS: Round 1 was completed by 71 patients and 39 clinicians, and Round 3 by 62 patients and 33 clinicians. The final consensus was that 33 pain features were important. These were grouped into an 8-item core outcome set comprising: pain intensity, pain interference with daily living, pain and physical functioning, temporal aspects of pain, pain description, emotional aspects of pain, use of pain medication, and improvement and satisfaction with pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: This core outcome set serves to guide assessment of CPSP after TKR. Consistency in assessment can promote standardized reporting and facilitate comparability between studies that address a common but understudied type of CPSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4409075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44090752015-04-29 Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set Wylde, V MacKichan, F Bruce, J Gooberman-Hill, R Eur J Pain New Research BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) after total knee replacement (TKR). There is scope to improve assessment of CPSP after TKR, and this study aimed to develop a core outcome set. METHODS: Eighty patients and 43 clinicians were recruited into a three-round modified Delphi study. In Round 1, participants were presented with 56 pain features identified from a systematic review, structured interviews with patients and focus groups with clinicians. Participants assigned importance ratings, using a 1–9 scale, to individual pain features; those features rated as most important were retained in subsequent rounds. Consensus that a pain feature should be included in the core outcome set was defined as the feature having a rating of 7–9 by ≥70% of both panels (patients and clinicians) and 1–3 by ≤15% of both panels or rated as 7–9 by ≥90% of one panel. RESULTS: Round 1 was completed by 71 patients and 39 clinicians, and Round 3 by 62 patients and 33 clinicians. The final consensus was that 33 pain features were important. These were grouped into an 8-item core outcome set comprising: pain intensity, pain interference with daily living, pain and physical functioning, temporal aspects of pain, pain description, emotional aspects of pain, use of pain medication, and improvement and satisfaction with pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: This core outcome set serves to guide assessment of CPSP after TKR. Consistency in assessment can promote standardized reporting and facilitate comparability between studies that address a common but understudied type of CPSP. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-05 2014-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4409075/ /pubmed/25154614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.582 Text en © 2014 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC®. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle New Research
Wylde, V
MacKichan, F
Bruce, J
Gooberman-Hill, R
Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set
title Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set
title_full Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set
title_fullStr Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set
title_short Assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: Development of a core outcome set
title_sort assessment of chronic post-surgical pain after knee replacement: development of a core outcome set
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25154614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.582
work_keys_str_mv AT wyldev assessmentofchronicpostsurgicalpainafterkneereplacementdevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT mackichanf assessmentofchronicpostsurgicalpainafterkneereplacementdevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT brucej assessmentofchronicpostsurgicalpainafterkneereplacementdevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset
AT goobermanhillr assessmentofchronicpostsurgicalpainafterkneereplacementdevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset