Cargando…
Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions
Estimation of the power spectrum is a common method for identifying oscillatory changes in neuronal activity. However, the stochastic nature of neuronal activity leads to severe biases in the estimation of these oscillations in single unit spike trains. Different biological and experimental factors...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25909328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004252 |
_version_ | 1782368189597876224 |
---|---|
author | Matzner, Ayala Bar-Gad, Izhar |
author_facet | Matzner, Ayala Bar-Gad, Izhar |
author_sort | Matzner, Ayala |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estimation of the power spectrum is a common method for identifying oscillatory changes in neuronal activity. However, the stochastic nature of neuronal activity leads to severe biases in the estimation of these oscillations in single unit spike trains. Different biological and experimental factors cause the spike train to differentially reflect its underlying oscillatory rate function. We analyzed the effect of factors, such as the mean firing rate and the recording duration, on the detectability of oscillations and their significance, and tested these theoretical results on experimental data recorded in Parkinsonian non-human primates. The effect of these factors is dramatic, such that in some conditions, the detection of existing oscillations is impossible. Moreover, these biases impede the comparison of oscillations across brain regions, neuronal types, behavioral states and separate recordings with different underlying parameters, and lead inevitably to a gross misinterpretation of experimental results. We introduce a novel objective measure, the "modulation index", which overcomes these biases, and enables reliable detection of oscillations from spike trains and a direct estimation of the oscillation magnitude. The modulation index detects a high percentage of oscillations over a wide range of parameters, compared to classical spectral analysis methods, and enables an unbiased comparison between spike trains recorded from different neurons and using different experimental protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4409360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44093602015-05-12 Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions Matzner, Ayala Bar-Gad, Izhar PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Estimation of the power spectrum is a common method for identifying oscillatory changes in neuronal activity. However, the stochastic nature of neuronal activity leads to severe biases in the estimation of these oscillations in single unit spike trains. Different biological and experimental factors cause the spike train to differentially reflect its underlying oscillatory rate function. We analyzed the effect of factors, such as the mean firing rate and the recording duration, on the detectability of oscillations and their significance, and tested these theoretical results on experimental data recorded in Parkinsonian non-human primates. The effect of these factors is dramatic, such that in some conditions, the detection of existing oscillations is impossible. Moreover, these biases impede the comparison of oscillations across brain regions, neuronal types, behavioral states and separate recordings with different underlying parameters, and lead inevitably to a gross misinterpretation of experimental results. We introduce a novel objective measure, the "modulation index", which overcomes these biases, and enables reliable detection of oscillations from spike trains and a direct estimation of the oscillation magnitude. The modulation index detects a high percentage of oscillations over a wide range of parameters, compared to classical spectral analysis methods, and enables an unbiased comparison between spike trains recorded from different neurons and using different experimental protocols. Public Library of Science 2015-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4409360/ /pubmed/25909328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004252 Text en © 2015 Matzner, Bar-Gad http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matzner, Ayala Bar-Gad, Izhar Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions |
title | Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions |
title_full | Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions |
title_short | Quantifying Spike Train Oscillations: Biases, Distortions and Solutions |
title_sort | quantifying spike train oscillations: biases, distortions and solutions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4409360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25909328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matznerayala quantifyingspiketrainoscillationsbiasesdistortionsandsolutions AT bargadizhar quantifyingspiketrainoscillationsbiasesdistortionsandsolutions |